collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?

No
161 (85.6%)
Yes
27 (14.4%)

Total Members Voted: 188

Author Topic: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?  (Read 29668 times)

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13140
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #15 on: June 19, 2017, 10:12:10 PM »
screw it lets copy AK and everyone puts and and only random non residents get drawn to pay for the states budget crisis.

More than one state plays that game.  Look at the cost of nonresident elk tags a couple hours east of Spokane.  WA has the double whammy of too many people and not many nonresident applicants.

We are already on a random draw, we just have points to keep people interested.

Offline blackveltbowhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 4117
  • BLAM
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #16 on: June 19, 2017, 10:12:42 PM »
No. As was mentioned I think overall, the OIL hunts truly offer real chances at trophy size animals, lots of them and very liberal season lengths, with low pressure. Sure exceptions exist but thats the basis. I will use archery as an example simply for the seasons sake. Lets assume you draw a top bull unit in the blues, first you are not dealing with a really high animal density, like most OIL. Especially mature trophy animals. Then you are limited to 12 days of season. If you see a bull at 100 yards you dont have the option of reaching over and grabbing your scoped magnum. And most importantly you will be hunting concurrent with a general season.


Offline Bobvernon2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 54
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #17 on: June 19, 2017, 10:15:03 PM »
screw it lets copy AK and everyone puts and and only random non residents get drawn to pay for the states budget crisis.

More than one state plays that game.  Look at the cost of nonresident elk tags a couple hours east of Spokane.  WA has the double whammy of too many people and not many nonresident applicants.

We are already on a random draw, we just have points to keep people interested.

not gonna lie not seeing what you're saying here. non residents don't have a limit on how many tags they can purchase in WA for elk, deer, cougar, or bear. nor do they have special rates its the same for every GMU. Am I missing something?

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9671
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #18 on: June 19, 2017, 10:16:38 PM »
Should be like ID... Pick 1 oil category and you do not get to apply for bucks and bulls or you can apply for bucks and Bulls and not oil tags. Plus when you draw buck or bull there's a waiting period. There's nothing here! It's really a joke! UT is 5 year wait once you draw a bull tag and 2 years for deer.

Offline Jharristealth

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 108
  • Location: Snohomish,WA
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #19 on: June 19, 2017, 10:36:40 PM »
I think the 65 and older category should have some quality tags available. Allow participants in that category to roll existing quality points to the "65 year and older quality deer/elk" catagory.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13140
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #20 on: June 19, 2017, 10:36:47 PM »
No. As was mentioned I think overall, the OIL hunts truly offer real chances at trophy size animals, lots of them and very liberal season lengths, with low pressure.

That's a great definition, but unfortunately not reality.  There are two ways to look at the problem, WA either has too few animals or too many people - or both I guess.  Even for a good but not great hunt, there are too many people in line such that you mathematically can't expect to draw it 2, 3 or 4 times in your life.

It isn't just WA, I put in for an out of state hunt that went from 1/3 the first year to 1/10 the second and 1/33 this year.  Next year, it will effectively be an OIL tag.

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1615
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #21 on: June 19, 2017, 11:10:22 PM »
There's not a single buck or bull tag in WA worth that designation . Some states do have tags like this such as Henry mts Utah. There are LOTS of options in this state to increase draw odds and they have done absolutely nothing about it EVER! If it means less money they don't wanna hear it.

Exactly

Offline mkcj

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Seatac/Winthrop,Wash
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #22 on: June 20, 2017, 12:26:31 AM »
How about certain tags/areas go oil?

Offline Mfowl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 4435
  • Location: westside
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #23 on: June 20, 2017, 12:35:00 AM »
What about the discrepancies between user groups. There are far more rifle hunters than either of the other user groups. It is much harder to draw the coveted rifle tags simply because of that. 2k or more applicants for maybe 1-5 rifle rut bull tags in a given gmu vs as much as 100 bull tags for 8-900 archery applicants. I don't think this question factors in the difference between the user groups. I voted no.
Fish hard, hunt harder!

Offline Miles

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3533
  • Location: Pensacola, Florida
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #24 on: June 20, 2017, 05:52:17 AM »
I hear lots of crying.  That's all, carry on

Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #25 on: June 20, 2017, 06:46:15 AM »
The good tags are oil. Even the tags you can draw are 8 years. With point creep that's oil.

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4221
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #26 on: June 20, 2017, 07:11:00 AM »
I don't see why.  Even if it takes 10-15 years, that's still 4-5 quality hunts for EACH category in a lifetime minimum.  That's 8-10 quality hunts across the board.  That doesn't include OTC or out of state.  That makes for a pretty solid hunting career!  Pretty cool!   :tup:

Offline Miles

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 3533
  • Location: Pensacola, Florida
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #27 on: June 20, 2017, 07:23:17 AM »
The good tags are oil. Even the tags you can draw are 8 years. With point creep that's oil.

Point creep in WA?   It's not a true preference point state...   Move somewhere that has a true preference point system, then you will understand the meaning of point creep.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45218
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #28 on: June 20, 2017, 07:24:57 AM »
I voted no but believe the department will have no choice after another 5 years of wolves without management.  :dunno:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1615
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #29 on: June 20, 2017, 07:46:38 AM »
The very best way would be to make it so you can only draw for one special permit.  You would have to choose a specific species in a specific category.  WDFW will never do it because of the lost revenue, but it would definitely fix the problem

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Japanese Kei truck? by mpeschon21
[Today at 11:56:36 AM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 10:56:11 AM]


Nile bull hunters by Guitarnbow6213
[Today at 10:51:59 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by kodiak06
[Today at 10:49:56 AM]


Westside Muzzy Elk Habitat Help and Rut Help by stur4351@gmail.com
[Today at 10:41:46 AM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by Antlershed
[Today at 09:17:49 AM]


Do you need a place to stay??? Methow / Alta / Chiliwist? by ASHQUACK
[Today at 08:55:41 AM]


Bear Snare? by Wendego716
[Today at 08:37:51 AM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by Jimmy33
[Today at 06:57:53 AM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Alan K
[Today at 06:15:14 AM]


GMU 111 Aladdin Moose Hunt 2025! by HillHound
[Today at 05:06:48 AM]


climbing stick users by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 08:15:22 PM]


WHAT DID YOUR TRUCK COST NEW? by N7XW
[Yesterday at 07:40:02 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 07:28:27 PM]


Quality tag by lewy
[Yesterday at 06:45:36 PM]


Goose hunting in Spokane by Badhabit
[Yesterday at 05:50:41 PM]


.45 kentucky rifle and patched roundballs by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 05:10:57 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 03:23:24 PM]


Smoked salmon by mikey549
[Yesterday at 02:17:02 PM]


Unit 346 little naches by jrebel
[Yesterday at 01:46:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal