collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Pinks  (Read 28702 times)

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Pinks
« Reply #45 on: July 18, 2017, 08:35:47 AM »
Not anyone specifically, just in general. Who cares if it was a resident or early ocean returney? Why does it matter? Go fishing and enjoy it.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline WAcoueshunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2601
Re: Pinks
« Reply #46 on: July 18, 2017, 12:18:03 PM »
Not anyone specifically, just in general. Who cares if it was a resident or early ocean returney? Why does it matter? Go fishing and enjoy it.

No kidding!  Like people are ashamed of catching a resident. They all eat good!   I pointed out that it was a resident coho because someone was trying to say pinks should be here because they caught a coho. That's not correct. Pinks will be here soon enough, and the ocean coho will be on their tails.

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9266
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Pinks
« Reply #47 on: July 18, 2017, 12:22:47 PM »
I honestly think it depends on how the said Coho identifies itself; whether it selects "resident" or "non resident."
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Pinks
« Reply #48 on: July 18, 2017, 12:59:22 PM »
I honestly think it depends on how the said Coho identifies itself; whether it selects "resident" or "non resident."

Now this is a whole nother ball of wax. Maybe they don't like being called silvers, but identify as kings? Pinks is a name with inherent feminine undertones, so now we're assuming their identity!?!?! So unfair, they really need to be shiny salmon-like fish with spots that may or may not have migrated to the ocean and might have spots on its tail, or dark gums. Not that theres anything wrong with dark gums or spotted tails!
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline jmscon

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 1215
  • Location: Seattle
  • RMEF BHA TRCP
Re: Pinks
« Reply #49 on: July 18, 2017, 01:08:55 PM »
Poor species, not only do they have the nickname of humpies, their true name is pinks. But not only that they're are also known as small and soft!
They need to seek shelter in Elliot Bay so I can take care of them!
My interpretation of the rules are open to interpretation.
Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken.

Offline FWilliams

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 296
  • Location: Methow Valley
Re: Pinks
« Reply #50 on: July 18, 2017, 02:19:45 PM »
Why are we having a pissing match over this?

I agree, why not be out there catching kings right now, fishing has been outstanding

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4956
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Pinks
« Reply #51 on: July 18, 2017, 02:48:16 PM »
Oh I have scratched a few kings out for sure.  MA11 is my home turf but fishing has been a bit slow so I have been hitting the other "hot" spots to fill the freezer.  Res or non res makes no difference. 

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Pinks
« Reply #52 on: July 18, 2017, 02:57:29 PM »
Poor species, not only do they have the nickname of humpies, their true name is pinks. But not only that they're are also known as small and soft!
They need to seek shelter in Elliot Bay so I can take care of them!

God I almost forgot about the dreaded nick name. Now we're all assuming their sexually promiscuous. I sense a lawsuit coming.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline Fishstiq

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 1256
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Pinks
« Reply #53 on: July 18, 2017, 05:09:53 PM »
I honestly think it depends on how the said Coho identifies itself; whether it selects "resident" or "non resident."

Now this is a whole nother ball of wax. Maybe they don't like being called silvers, but identify as kings? Pinks is a name with inherent feminine undertones, so now we're assuming their identity!?!?! So unfair, they really need to be shiny salmon-like fish with spots that may or may not have migrated to the ocean and might have spots on its tail, or dark gums. Not that theres anything wrong with dark gums or spotted tails!

Please refer to them as fishself until they can choose their preferred pronoun.  Otherwise you are being ableist and transphobic.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”


― Samuel Adams

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Pinks
« Reply #54 on: July 23, 2017, 12:53:01 PM »
Landed two off Eagle Point,  SJ today. Both deep, 110-115, nothing on the center dive plane. Lost about a 20 pound King right at the boat.  My rookie netter wasn't quite quick enough. 😣

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

« Last Edit: July 23, 2017, 03:19:03 PM by lokidog »

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Pinks
« Reply #55 on: July 31, 2017, 10:43:21 AM »
No pink fishing in 8-2 this year, right?

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Pinks
« Reply #56 on: July 31, 2017, 10:57:27 AM »
No,  and probably not even if Pinks come back in higher numbers than predicted.
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Pinks
« Reply #57 on: July 31, 2017, 12:16:11 PM »
But it shows ok to fish the rivers right? Why not close them if numbers are so bad?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk


Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Pinks
« Reply #58 on: July 31, 2017, 12:19:22 PM »
The Snohomish is suppose to have a strong run with it being open. The Skagit and Stilly not! Could not even imagine what a chitshow the Snohomish will be :rolleyes:
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7041
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: Pinks
« Reply #59 on: July 31, 2017, 12:22:45 PM »
The Snohomish is suppose to have a strong run with it being open. The Skagit and Stilly not! Could not even imagine what a chitshow the Snohomish will be :rolleyes:

It's going to be a snag-fest. 

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal