collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: ladder test results, advice needed  (Read 6340 times)

Offline wooltie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 493
  • Location: Whatcom County
ladder test results, advice needed
« on: April 20, 2018, 11:33:14 AM »
What would you conclude to be a good node based upon these ladder test results?  Any advice is appreciated.

Shot 1 = lowest charge
Shot 9 = highest charge

Shots were charged in 0.5g increments, shot at 100 yards.

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2018, 11:34:41 AM »
Ladder test to pressure, drop a grain or so and shoot 3-5 at that weight.  Quickest way I've been tought
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline LabChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 538
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2018, 11:49:11 AM »
Shoot 2 three shot test groups of each recipe. That will tell you much more about what the rifle likes better or worse than the others. Also play with seating depth after that. Makes a big difference depending on your set up. Some like to be backed off, some like to be touching the barrel. But I'd suggest making sure to shoot at least 2 3 shot groups to determine which fits best for your set up. Hard to tell only shooting one bullet for each load

Offline Reidus

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 877
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2018, 12:08:19 PM »
shooting in a cross wind? seems like a lot of horizontal.

I'd try loads 6, 7 and 8 again.

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2018, 12:11:17 PM »
You can do a ladder test just fine with singles. But not so great at 100 yards. 300 yards minimum for ladder testing single loads.

From what I see 8-9 looks good but at 100 yards its hard to see the speed difference. May look level but could be just coincidence.  If 100 yards is as far as you can shoot then do 3 shot ocw testing.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1103
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2018, 12:26:47 PM »
No detailed on what caliber you are shooting, but ALL the shots are low for 100 yards unless you are shooting patched round balls

Offline jmscon

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 1215
  • Location: Seattle
  • RMEF BHA TRCP
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2018, 12:33:48 PM »
Did you use a chrono?

I will be getting into this during the summer, once my rifle is put back together.
My interpretation of the rules are open to interpretation.
Once I thought I was wrong but I was mistaken.

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2018, 12:38:52 PM »
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10643
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2018, 12:39:42 PM »
No detailed on what caliber you are shooting, but ALL the shots are low for 100 yards unless you are shooting patched round balls
point of impact is irrelevant in this test.  The target is merely a repeatable aiming point.  The task is collecting data, not hitting where you are aiming.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline wooltie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 493
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2018, 12:40:02 PM »
30-06, 165g accubond, IMR4350, 53-57g in 0.5g increments.

I have not zeroed the rifle for the given bullet weight, which is why all shots were low.

There was a slight cross wind, but I have not adjusted the scope horizontal.

At this point I was looking for a flat spot on three shots.  2, 3, 4 look flat.  8, 9, 6 look flat, but 7 dips down.  There's always that higher charge weight that shoots lower than the previous lower charge weight e.g. shot 7 lower than 6.

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2018, 12:42:54 PM »
30-06, 165g accubond, IMR4350, 53-57g in 0.5g increments.

I have not zeroed the rifle for the given bullet weight, which is why all shots were low.

There was a slight cross wind, but I have not adjusted the scope horizontal.

At this point I was looking for a flat spot on three shots.  2, 3, 4 look flat.  8, 9, 6 look flat, but 7 dips down.  There's always that higher charge weight that shoots lower than the previous lower charge weight e.g. shot 7 lower than 6.
you can do ladder testing over a chrono  at 100 yards or with out a target at all.  If those loads are 1 moa you won't get accurate results.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Henrydog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 1103
  • Location: Eastern Washington
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, RMEF, Phesants Forever
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2018, 12:49:53 PM »
No detailed on what caliber you are shooting, but ALL the shots are low for 100 yards unless you are shooting patched round balls
point of impact is irrelevant in this test.  The target is merely a repeatable aiming point.  The task is collecting data, not hitting where you are aiming.

10-4 I don't think before I speak...and I guess I don't before I type either. :chuckle:

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16006
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2018, 12:51:59 PM »
 :chuckle:
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1166
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2018, 12:59:26 PM »
In a nutshell, and no offense implied, those results are randomly inconclusive and should not be relied upon for determining an optimum load.

There are at least two approaches to "ladder testing" that seem to have merit, at least with regard to precision shooting or finding your rifle's favorite load with a particular brass/primer/powder/bullet/seating/neck tension combo.

The first one basically entails shooting at a fairly distant target (400-500 yards) on a perfectly wind free day if possible while holding point of aim at the same place on the target. (This may not be possible or realistic depending upon the attributes of the rifle system and shooter ability.) Assuming constant enviro conditions from a cool barrel, the theory is that as velocity increases so too will the printing of your impacts. You are not shooting for group with this method. You're simply looking for a "node" where impacts appear to bunch together vertically. Preferably, one should perform this two to three times in order to obtain a reasonable understanding of which ranges of powder charges your rifle likes.

The second, which can be done alone or after determining the range of powder charges to investigate, simply allocate 4-5 rounds per charge and shoot for group. Pick the tightest group and run with it.



« Last Edit: April 20, 2018, 01:05:57 PM by Bushcraft »
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1166
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2018, 01:05:27 PM »
http://www.6mmbr.com/laddertest.html

Bingo.  There is a wealth of knowledge to be had from that website.
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline wooltie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 493
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2018, 01:58:24 PM »
In a nutshell, and no offense implied, those results are randomly inconclusive and should not be relied upon for determining an optimum load.

There are at least two approaches to "ladder testing" that seem to have merit, at least with regard to precision shooting or finding your rifle's favorite load with a particular brass/primer/powder/bullet/seating/neck tension combo.

The first one basically entails shooting at a fairly distant target (400-500 yards) on a perfectly wind free day if possible while holding point of aim at the same place on the target. (This may not be possible or realistic depending upon the attributes of the rifle system and shooter ability.) Assuming constant enviro conditions from a cool barrel, the theory is that as velocity increases so too will the printing of your impacts. You are not shooting for group with this method. You're simply looking for a "node" where impacts appear to bunch together vertically. Preferably, one should perform this two to three times in order to obtain a reasonable understanding of which ranges of powder charges your rifle likes.

The second, which can be done alone or after determining the range of powder charges to investigate, simply allocate 4-5 rounds per charge and shoot for group. Pick the tightest group and run with it.

This is the approach I was/intended to use.  Same POA, consistent rests, 2-3 minutes between shots.  Albeit I could repeat the process from 200y instead of 100.  Looking for shots with close vertical, then move onto 4-5 shot groups per charges around those charge weights.

Thanks everyone for the input.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2018, 02:08:01 PM »
I have tried with limited success at 100 yards, with hunting grade rifles.  If you can't get your signal (load separation) adequately separated from the noise (inherent rifle and shooting repeatability), 100 yards is a tall order for a good ladder test for garden variety rifles and possible inconsistent shooting conditions.  I didn't have a rest other than sandbags on a bench.

A longer distance would yield greater separation, which should make node discovery less like guesswork.

I did get enough of an idea to let me push forward with selecting which loads to further pursue with shooting for smallest groups.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2018, 06:04:23 PM »
30-06, 165g accubond, IMR4350, 53-57g in 0.5g increments.

I have not zeroed the rifle for the given bullet weight, which is why all shots were low.

There was a slight cross wind, but I have not adjusted the scope horizontal.

At this point I was looking for a flat spot on three shots.  2, 3, 4 look flat.  8, 9, 6 look flat, but 7 dips down.  There's always that higher charge weight that shoots lower than the previous lower charge weight e.g. shot 7 lower than 6.

56.5 grains behind every 165 gr lead based bullet I have shot through three different 30-06's has been the best.  Bullet seated so just off the lands, pretty much max length for the magazine as it flattens the plastic tip a little on my ballistic tips.

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5602
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2018, 08:41:55 AM »
Try 3 shots of load #3 at 200 yards and then adjust seating at .010 closer - repeat, .010 farther , repeat.  Report back.   :tup:

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 443
  • Location: NW WA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2018, 04:38:59 PM »
I'd load it again and go .2 or .3 grain increments and shoot it over a chrono.  I think you're going to be hard pressed to find a velocity flat spot when taking .5 grain increments as most nodes aren't that big.  I don't even shoot my ladder tests on a target, I just strap the chrono on and shoot my ladder, then look for the velocity flat spots, and load up and hit the range for accuracy testing from there.

Offline wooltie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 493
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #20 on: April 22, 2018, 08:54:56 AM »
I'd load it again and go .2 or .3 grain increments and shoot it over a chrono.  I think you're going to be hard pressed to find a velocity flat spot when taking .5 grain increments as most nodes aren't that big.  I don't even shoot my ladder tests on a target, I just strap the chrono on and shoot my ladder, then look for the velocity flat spots, and load up and hit the range for accuracy testing from there.

I did this while working on another load, same rifle.  Found a flat spot over the chrono, then loaded up five rounds to confirm and saw an ES of 15 and SD of 6.  Took this load and adjusted the seating depth, but couldn't find a group less than 1.25-1.5" @ 100 yards.  This was with a 180g bullet, so I switched bullet weights to see if the gun just doesn't like the 180gs.  Shooting .020" off the lands.  Haven't played the switching out powder game yet though.

This is for hunting, not target shooting, looking for MOA or less.

I had a lot of chrono data from different charge weights.  Out of a five shot group there is always that 1 or 2 shots where the velocity hits 30-40 FPS higher/lower than the other four shots.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #21 on: April 22, 2018, 08:59:42 AM »
180's have not shot decently out of the three rifles I have tried them in a 1917 Eddystone, a Remington 760, and a Browning A-bolt.  The 165's have been a much more consistent offering. For me, the only reason I would look at a different powder than 4350 is if I was going to all Cu bullets as my loads at 56.5 are already compressed a little and the longer coppers would maybe be too much compression.   :twocents:

Offline wooltie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 493
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2018, 12:19:52 PM »
The barrel might have just settled down too. Could be other stuff aside from the loads.

I've been seating the 180s .020 off the lands and cleaning using boretech eliminator. I always see some copper coming out.

I seated the 165s .100 off the lands and just cleaned the barrel...no copper whatsoever, no light blue green stuff.

Most factory rounds have a .125-.100 jump for my gun

Offline lord grizzly

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 789
  • Location: idaho
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2018, 12:59:42 PM »
No detailed on what caliber you are shooting, but ALL the shots are low for 100 yards unless you are shooting patched round balls
point of impact is irrelevant in this test.  The target is merely a repeatable aiming point.  The task is collecting data, not hitting where you are aiming.

And one shot of each charge tells you nothing. Load um up again and get at least three of each. I’ve actually gone away from the typical ladder test for some time. If I have 9 different loads I’ll put up 9 targets and shot one each all the way through ( never three off the same load but one each fill all are shot) tha gets you where your trying to go a lot faster. And yes, shoot through a chrono or rally your not learning anything

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8994
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2018, 08:33:48 PM »
I stopped doing the “three rounds of each weight” thing when I realized I didn’t care about accuracy nodes at low velocity. Yes I realize that sometimes we want a light recoiling easy shooting load. That said, I believe most of us reload for high performance and consistency. In that case, why shoot all that powder for loads that wouldn’t interest the shooter ballistically regardless of accuracy.

Yes accuracy is the paramount factor in precise shooting. But by playing with powders and primers and seating depth a bit, it’s rare that one can’t find a spicy load that shoots tight groups too.



Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #25 on: April 23, 2018, 05:18:36 AM »
I stopped doing the “three rounds of each weight” thing when I realized I didn’t care about accuracy nodes at low velocity. Yes I realize that sometimes we want a light recoiling easy shooting load. That said, I believe most of us reload for high performance and consistency. In that case, why shoot all that powder for loads that wouldn’t interest the shooter ballistically regardless of accuracy.

Yes accuracy is the paramount factor in precise shooting. But by playing with powders and primers and seating depth a bit, it’s rare that one can’t find a spicy load that shoots tight groups too.




:yeah:
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5602
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #26 on: April 23, 2018, 05:42:09 AM »
I stopped doing the “three rounds of each weight” thing when I realized I didn’t care about accuracy nodes at low velocity. Yes I realize that sometimes we want a light recoiling easy shooting load. That said, I believe most of us reload for high performance and consistency. In that case, why shoot all that powder for loads that wouldn’t interest the shooter ballistically regardless of accuracy.

Yes accuracy is the paramount factor in precise shooting. But by playing with powders and primers and seating depth a bit, it’s rare that one can’t find a spicy load that shoots tight groups too.

How do you fine tune around your upper end load then?  I do 3 or 4 shot groups around suspected upper node suggested by ladder test and quickload and watching for velocity plateau but maybe there is an easier way ? 

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #27 on: April 23, 2018, 06:01:31 AM »
I stopped doing the “three rounds of each weight” thing when I realized I didn’t care about accuracy nodes at low velocity. Yes I realize that sometimes we want a light recoiling easy shooting load. That said, I believe most of us reload for high performance and consistency. In that case, why shoot all that powder for loads that wouldn’t interest the shooter ballistically regardless of accuracy.

Yes accuracy is the paramount factor in precise shooting. But by playing with powders and primers and seating depth a bit, it’s rare that one can’t find a spicy load that shoots tight groups too.

How do you fine tune around your upper end load then?  I do 3 or 4 shot groups around suspected upper node suggested by ladder test and quickload and watching for velocity plateau but maybe there is an easier way ? 
i can't answer for the Jon but I do single shot ladder to find up node and preasure. Then group test that node. Normally have less than 30 rounds to find my load and tune it. Has worked well for me.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline hogslayer

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 818
  • Location: Snoqualmie-Belfair
  • Groups: Bloody decks
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #28 on: April 23, 2018, 06:30:01 AM »
If that was shot at a further distance i would load 7.  Having positive compensation with higher velocity rounds is something i look for.  If your grouping is that size at 100, i would take and do a seating depth test to see if you can shrink that down and then back up to 300.

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5602
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #29 on: April 23, 2018, 07:28:06 AM »
Good point - you can have a load that throws a faster round low at 100 that looks bad but at 600 that lower trajectory of faster rounds evens out.  Thats why a ladder at your max range is helpful.  Of course if you get your es down it doesnt matter much.

Offline hogslayer

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 818
  • Location: Snoqualmie-Belfair
  • Groups: Bloody decks
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #30 on: April 23, 2018, 08:41:11 AM »
I like to tune with positive compensation.  To me it helps with any temp swing you would see in a hunting situation.  This is a ladder I shot last month.  Changes primers and the (3) powder charges ended up being 16 FPS apart when shot again.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #31 on: April 23, 2018, 08:50:58 AM »
I stopped doing the “three rounds of each weight” thing when I realized I didn’t care about accuracy nodes at low velocity. Yes I realize that sometimes we want a light recoiling easy shooting load. That said, I believe most of us reload for high performance and consistency. In that case, why shoot all that powder for loads that wouldn’t interest the shooter ballistically regardless of accuracy.

Yes accuracy is the paramount factor in precise shooting. But by playing with powders and primers and seating depth a bit, it’s rare that one can’t find a spicy load that shoots tight groups too.

How do you fine tune around your upper end load then?  I do 3 or 4 shot groups around suspected upper node suggested by ladder test and quickload and watching for velocity plateau but maybe there is an easier way ?
I think the jon was saying that he won’t use up lots of components on lower velocity loads. I do the same. Work up to find max load and then fine tune from there. There isn’t a need to shoot a min starting load for groups imo if it’s 100-200 fps lower than the cartridge is capable of.
Basically the same as you but without quickload.

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5602
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #32 on: April 23, 2018, 10:10:27 AM »
Got It! I agree I just cant bring myself to search lower velocity rounds for a node either tho I know Im needlessly handicapping myself by being speed hungry.

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #33 on: April 23, 2018, 11:00:43 AM »
Got It! I agree I just cant bring myself to search lower velocity rounds for a node either tho I know Im needlessly handicapping myself by being speed hungry.
That’s because faster is always more better!  :tung:

Offline wooltie

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 493
  • Location: Whatcom County
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #34 on: April 23, 2018, 05:31:20 PM »
The upper end shot MOA, once LOL. 

I loaded up 5 charge weights in 3 shot groups and watched the rounds go from no group to group.

Still have to load up more rounds of that charge weight and play with seating depth to verify that load groups consistently, but it's a start.

165g accubond,  56.5 g IMR4350.

I understand and like the theory behind the ladder testing using a chrony to obtain data and ignore target impact.  Find the flat spot, load around the flat spot to verify groups, adjust SD accordingly.  I saw inconsistencies between the point of impact and the measured velocity.  Some higher velocity shots actually impacted the target lower than lower velocity shots.  I ran with the flat spot, but couldn't get the rounds to group at all after adjusting for seating depth.  I might have messed up somewhere, or my rifle just doesn't these bullets in 180g.

Can anyone explain why a higher charge weight might produce a point of impact lower than that of a lower charge weight?  I would expect the ladder to go up, up, up, flat, flat, up, etc...not up, up, flat, down, up, down, up, up.




Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5602
Re: ladder test results, advice needed
« Reply #36 on: April 23, 2018, 07:34:52 PM »
Imagine your barrel as a tuning fork vibrating up and down or oval like a clock face. You want round to leave just before top or 11 oclock. Rounds that are slightly faster will leave when barrel tip is lower to offset their higher impact due to higher speed.  The 12 oclock position is the node. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by 6haase6
[Today at 07:29:05 PM]


Steel Targets??? by jrebel
[Today at 05:30:52 PM]


Buying pheasants for training by Ellensburg
[Today at 03:45:33 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by First timer
[Today at 03:13:57 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Stein
[Today at 09:05:06 AM]


Oregon results posted. by trophyhunt
[Today at 08:51:12 AM]


best draw for moose unit wise by hunter399
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by trophyelk6x6
[Today at 08:24:13 AM]


2025 OILS! by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:40:49 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by lhrbull
[Today at 06:59:24 AM]


Nooksack Archery Tag by LongBomb
[Today at 06:29:37 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by Turner89
[Yesterday at 11:33:35 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 09:54:06 PM]


Basin elk by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 09:50:49 PM]


Getting back into dogs by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 09:06:14 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Nwgunner
[Yesterday at 08:55:00 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 08:50:46 PM]


Is FS70 open? by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 08:09:04 PM]


Muzzy Mission Quality!!! by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:49:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal