Free: Contests & Raffles.
There's probably a number of ways to skin the cat. One way would be to admit defeat in places where we have no reasonable chance at bring wild fish back and use them to pump out billions of fish. Your brood stock idea is another possibility. All if it will probably need some changes made at the legislative level. But, it's hard to argue that the most immediate and effective way to get more kings eaten by killer whales is to stop killing a million or so of them a year. Fish we release now won't be back for 5 years. That's 5 years where the only answer appears to be harvest.
Along with the Pinnipeds, how about the nets. I know it will take a few cycles but it seems that every year would generate more and more if they were allowed to spawn. A 100,000 spawning this year would generate more spawning the next and so on if the nets weren't there.
One potential problem is that it may take a few spawning cycles to build up enough fish. Even if it is two cycles, you are looking at a decade.
Try this on for sizeIndians train orcas to eat sealsFish and game train orcas to remove nets
Quote from: Smokeploe on April 04, 2019, 08:27:08 PMTry this on for sizeIndians train orcas to eat sealsFish and game train orcas to remove netsThe transient orcas eat seals all the time, they get them trapped in Hood Canal sometimes and crush them. The resident orcas don't for the most part.
It's a tricky pickle for sure. We have ESA listed whales and ESA listed Chinook. We can pump out Chinook to maybe feed the whales (I say maybe since it won't happen for 4 or 5 years if we released the fish now, which we can't, because we don't have them to release). Current science and policy says doing so will harm the ESA listed Chinook, so you have to harm one ESA listed species to help another. There's no easy path forward that I can see.