Free: Contests & Raffles.
@Pegasus I don't have a dog in this fight, but there's no "insider info" here. Email WDFW and ask them for updated raffle sale #'s....that's all you gotta do. No offense to @Bushcraft but his use of the "internal contact" or whatever he said was probably a little fancier sounding than it needed to be. Any joe shmo off the street can reach out to WDFW and ask whebever they want to, whether they bought no tickets or 10,000 tickets.Quote from: Pegasus on July 01, 2019, 11:19:49 PMQuote from: Rainier10 on July 01, 2019, 11:09:20 PMI will testify that I knew last weeks ticket sales. I sent an email to my internal contact at WDFW, wildthing@dfw.wa.gov and two hours later I got a reply with the numbers. It never entered my mind that it might be seen as scandalous to reach out to them and ask a question. I just figured I buy a license every year and that pays their salary they should answer a question if asked. I didn’t even have to fill out the standard form public request for information.Again if you need me to testify to that I have no problem. I still have the email exchange if needed. Not sure what me testifying will prove, maybe that the WDFW does want us to have the information. Nice try. Where on the raffle site does the game dept reveal to the general public that you can obtain current numbers on the raffles by either emailing or calling? How many raffle participants are aware that they are doing this for the wealthy? Yes you are included in that category. I know...its relative but most hunters can't spent $16,000 bucks on a raffle for goats like some can at a whim with special "inside info" from certain people at the WDFW. Save your emails please.Nowhere on WDFW's website have I ever seen it mentioned to do lots of things that are doable. I email biologists every year for info on areas I plan to hunt. I've never seen anywhere where it says to do that. They do make it clear that the primary goal of the program is to generate revenue, not to be fair to the average joe(me) or anything else for that matter. That is here:https://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/special-hunts/auction-raffle-faqSince the inception of the program in 1994, the primary objective of auction and raffle permits has been to generate revenue specifically for the management of the hunted species. As such, specific code was adopted in RCW 77.32.530 and WACs 232-28-290 and 232-28-292. These codes established the fiscal requirements for auction and raffle funds and describe structure of auction and raffle procedures and hunting opportunities.@Pegasus have you ever purchased a raffle ticket?
Quote from: Rainier10 on July 01, 2019, 11:09:20 PMI will testify that I knew last weeks ticket sales. I sent an email to my internal contact at WDFW, wildthing@dfw.wa.gov and two hours later I got a reply with the numbers. It never entered my mind that it might be seen as scandalous to reach out to them and ask a question. I just figured I buy a license every year and that pays their salary they should answer a question if asked. I didn’t even have to fill out the standard form public request for information.Again if you need me to testify to that I have no problem. I still have the email exchange if needed. Not sure what me testifying will prove, maybe that the WDFW does want us to have the information. Nice try. Where on the raffle site does the game dept reveal to the general public that you can obtain current numbers on the raffles by either emailing or calling? How many raffle participants are aware that they are doing this for the wealthy? Yes you are included in that category. I know...its relative but most hunters can't spent $16,000 bucks on a raffle for goats like some can at a whim with special "inside info" from certain people at the WDFW. Save your emails please.
I will testify that I knew last weeks ticket sales. I sent an email to my internal contact at WDFW, wildthing@dfw.wa.gov and two hours later I got a reply with the numbers. It never entered my mind that it might be seen as scandalous to reach out to them and ask a question. I just figured I buy a license every year and that pays their salary they should answer a question if asked. I didn’t even have to fill out the standard form public request for information.Again if you need me to testify to that I have no problem. I still have the email exchange if needed. Not sure what me testifying will prove, maybe that the WDFW does want us to have the information.
Quote from: jackelope on July 02, 2019, 10:54:14 AM@Pegasus I don't have a dog in this fight, but there's no "insider info" here. Email WDFW and ask them for updated raffle sale #'s....that's all you gotta do. No offense to @Bushcraft but his use of the "internal contact" or whatever he said was probably a little fancier sounding than it needed to be. Any joe shmo off the street can reach out to WDFW and ask whebever they want to, whether they bought no tickets or 10,000 tickets.Quote from: Pegasus on July 01, 2019, 11:19:49 PMQuote from: Rainier10 on July 01, 2019, 11:09:20 PMI will testify that I knew last weeks ticket sales. I sent an email to my internal contact at WDFW, wildthing@dfw.wa.gov and two hours later I got a reply with the numbers. It never entered my mind that it might be seen as scandalous to reach out to them and ask a question. I just figured I buy a license every year and that pays their salary they should answer a question if asked. I didn’t even have to fill out the standard form public request for information.Again if you need me to testify to that I have no problem. I still have the email exchange if needed. Not sure what me testifying will prove, maybe that the WDFW does want us to have the information. Nice try. Where on the raffle site does the game dept reveal to the general public that you can obtain current numbers on the raffles by either emailing or calling? How many raffle participants are aware that they are doing this for the wealthy? Yes you are included in that category. I know...its relative but most hunters can't spent $16,000 bucks on a raffle for goats like some can at a whim with special "inside info" from certain people at the WDFW. Save your emails please.Nowhere on WDFW's website have I ever seen it mentioned to do lots of things that are doable. I email biologists every year for info on areas I plan to hunt. I've never seen anywhere where it says to do that. They do make it clear that the primary goal of the program is to generate revenue, not to be fair to the average joe(me) or anything else for that matter. That is here:https://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/special-hunts/auction-raffle-faqSince the inception of the program in 1994, the primary objective of auction and raffle permits has been to generate revenue specifically for the management of the hunted species. As such, specific code was adopted in RCW 77.32.530 and WACs 232-28-290 and 232-28-292. These codes established the fiscal requirements for auction and raffle funds and describe structure of auction and raffle procedures and hunting opportunities.@Pegasus have you ever purchased a raffle ticket? Exactly.
I will add to my comments that there isn't a shred of anything in me that thinks they don't update the numbers as some sort of cover up one way or the other. We've got one member complaining about no updates on behalf of the big spenders and another member complaining about no updates on behalf of the average joe guys. As far as I go, they have zero responsibility to update the numbers at all, so a single update at all is more than we're "entitled" to.
There's a third category you are neglecting. Those of us who do not purchase raffle tickets that simply want WDFW to get maximum revenue out of any raffle/auction of wildlife in this state IF they are determined to offer said raffle/auction tags.
Quote from: idahohuntr on July 02, 2019, 12:29:27 PMThere's a third category you are neglecting. Those of us who do not purchase raffle tickets that simply want WDFW to get maximum revenue out of any raffle/auction of wildlife in this state IF they are determined to offer said raffle/auction tags. You're right. For obvious reasons I intentially didn't include the perspective of forum members that complain, but aren't actually participating in the raffle ticket arena."The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena."Oh, the juicy irony of your signature line.
Quote from: Bushcraft on July 02, 2019, 01:00:28 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on July 02, 2019, 12:29:27 PMThere's a third category you are neglecting. Those of us who do not purchase raffle tickets that simply want WDFW to get maximum revenue out of any raffle/auction of wildlife in this state IF they are determined to offer said raffle/auction tags. You're right. For obvious reasons I intentially didn't include the perspective of forum members that complain, but aren't actually participating in the raffle ticket arena."The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena."Oh, the juicy irony of your signature line. If you had even a modest knowledge of the NAMWC you would understand why active participation in auctions and raffles is not a prerequisite for having equally valid say in how the publics wildlife resources are allocated.
Here is some other 2018 raffle information for you to digest. Purchasers is the number of people who bought a ticket in each category last year. Tickets sold speaks for itself. If they capped the sales to only one ticket per person you would definitely see revenue drop.Category Purchasers TicketsBT deer 222 1094West elk 358 1977Mule deer 509 2516WT deer 214 1425East elk 551 6365Goat 310 4482Moose 842 3676NC combo 196 7717NE combo 296 901Sheep 344 6734SC combo 268 4398SE combo 148 7903 Deer 201 1812
Its is a raffle and it is covered under the state gambling laws. That is why you can't you can't purchase tickets online. Since when is it OK to favor a select few? People are justifying the illegal actions by claiming that the state derives more revenues by screwing the general population instead of treating all purchasers the same. They release numbers privately to entice big buyers and they are giving them an advantage by releasing the numbers of bets already placed to a select few. If it were a fair gamble you would make the same info available to all at the same same time or not at all to everyone. They only release numbers at their selected times to pretend to be playing fair. They are not. I suspect the state will be challenged in court if enough of us deplorables start asking hard questions. Either release the numbers simultaneously as they occur or not at all. They surely can if they want to. Buyers want to know what the odds are. More buyers = less odds of winning. Why should some clown or a few select clowns get fed that info when the rest of us deplorables don't? What if you go to the local casino and a select few know what machines have the best odds or the best time to place a bet to win? We can always justify criminal behavior with poor excuses but they are just that... poor excuses. Stop rigging the raffles and don't get me started about the permit draw applications.
"The only thing that's remotely unfair is that we taxpayers have lazy, incompetent people (not)working for us in our state and federal agencies that are almost impossible to fire. They could, and should, have the numbers of raffle tickets sold updated instantly online. Which was my initial gripe and warning a few years ago."I agree that the numbers should be posted almost instantaneously but let us not blame people for not posting the numbers as incompetent. I am sure the the raffle numbers are updated and viewed daily by the higher-ups at the WDFW. Not releasing the numbers for two weeks after the permit draws notifications is not an accident IMHO.If you call a company and some clerk gives you info that allows you to make an investment based on non-disclosed info you get to go to jail. Seems like someone got sentenced to 4 years today for selling on non-public info. Giving out non-public info to a select few on a raffle that increases their odds does not sound any different. Wide dissemination is the key...not buddies at the WDFW for a few.
Quote from: Bushcraft on July 01, 2019, 11:32:02 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on July 01, 2019, 09:28:50 PMQuote from: Bushcraft on July 01, 2019, 08:46:17 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on July 01, 2019, 08:29:37 PMIf they were smart AND good stewards of the publics resources they would not update the numbers until after the draw is complete...or not at all. Wrong, on both accounts. At least you're consistent.We already went through the basic math relating to the need to update the numbers. "Whales" or "Mr. Bigs" aren't going to play if they don't know what the odds are. No odds, no whales...substantially less revenue. Not sure why you're having difficulty with the straightforward concept. As to "not at all" posting the number of tickets purchased (that's how you wrote it), WDFW is a public agency and they work for us. Every bleeping dime and action is accountable and should be absolutely transparent, both on the inflows and outflows. To suggest otherwise is delving into big-government-knows-best-pinko-commie territory amigo. Two lines of evidence that do not support your belief that WDFW generates more revenue by posting updated ticket sales:1. People whining their purchases have not been reflected on the ticket sales page quickly enough - a clear and obvious attempt of "whales" to discourage others from purchasing tickets. 2. Virtually no other Western State or private company (e.g., huntin fool) offers real time updates of raffle ticket sales.Your suggestion that no "whales" will participate if they don't know the odds is interesting. Are you suggesting Wyoming, Idaho, Montana etc. don't have "whales" buying loads of raffle tickets? I unequivocally know that to be a false assertion.Good grief. I'm seriously biting my tongue here.You need to take a remedial Logic course idahohunter. Neither of your points are evidence or supportive of your opinion that not updating ticket sales would somehow generate more revenue for the department. Let's paint this picture differently to try and help you to understand. Let's use the lottery. MegaMillions Powerball or whatever it's called.So, take a moment and pause from desperately wanting to be right (or make me appear to be wrong, same difference ) and reflect upon why the lotteries display the increasing value of a given lottery.Why is it that the stores and machines that sell them advertise the updated amount you could win if you played?It's been long since proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the larger the lottery pool, the more people will buy more lottery tickets. Limited transparency into potential payout, and odds of winning, dramatically diminishes participation.When the lottery is a "paltry" $15 million, very few people bother playing. When it builds up to $800 million, LOTS of people play that otherwise wouldn't even remotely consider wasting a buck or two on a lottery ticket. Once that lottery gets up to hundreds of millions, playing at that level is a lark. As a student of human nature, I can tell you that it's a silly phenomenon because either amount would dramatically alter the lives of the winner. Accordingly, why don't people play all the time? Well, due to some oddities of human perception, they are more drawn to the prospects of a potentially larger payout even though they know the odds of winning either are approximately zero.Now, let's shift gears to raffles for something with a fixed payout value. Fixed in the sense that there is an essentially known value of a given item and there is a ceiling on the value of the item. It's not like a lottery that just gets bigger if no one wins. When it comes to the type of raffles like the ones we are discussing, far fewer people with essentially zero chance of winning will still play but they'll only buy a relatively small number of tickets per person. The vast majority will only buy one. That's just the way these things go. That number would change dramatically if it cost $50,000,000 to go on a sheep hunt and the winning raffle ticket was transferable to a willing buyer or redeemable in cash. Understandably, far more people would be willing to take a chance and buy a ticket worth $50MM even if they weren't hunters. But, sheep hunts just don't come anywhere near that coast and there's only a few people - relatively speaking in a state of 7.5MM people, that want to hunt sheep anyway. In fact, it's relatively easy to figure out since all one has to do is look up the number of people that put in for special permit applications, or even raffle tags for that matter. It's a comparatively small percentage of the population. Again, the vast majority of whom, if historical data is any indication will just buy one ticket, even though they could theoretically buy an unlimited quantity.But, if there is some perceived chance at increasing their odds of winning a fixed value raffle, some of the people will carefully weigh the "sure thing" cost of just buying the hunt vs. the risk of a gambling loss. Some will just forego playing, and save up and pay for the hunt outright. Others will have the financial wherewithal to lay down a pile of cash to gain better odds of winning, but they'll only do so up to a point that makes sense to them on a single throw or over a year over year basis. For example, if someone buys 33% percent of the expected number of raffle tickets sold every year, odds are that they'll get it once every three years (with no guarantee of course). They'll likely end up paying a third of the cost, two thirds of the cost or the full cost for a guided hunt. If it's a third...great. If it's two-thirds...nice discount. Full boat...they wanted to go sheep hunting anyway. If their luck totally sucked, they disposable income at that level is such that they can scrape up something and just go. Bottome line is they are just playing the odds with disposable income that they would nototherwise spend at all if they didn't know the odds. The lower the understanding of what the odds are, the lower the interest level in playing. The lower the interest level in playing, the lower amount of disposable income they are going to play with. The lower amount they play with, the lower the revenue generated by the raffle.It's just that simple.That's a lot of rambling for a simple "explanation". There is a reason no other western state or private companies provide real time draw odds on their wildlife/hunt raffles. But even if I try to follow your "logic" trail do you really believe there are not big spenders in Wyoming, Idaho, Montana raffles...which is your direct assertion since those states do not provide real time odds. Perhaps the more clear example: why do you suppose a private company founded on the basis of providing draw odds to its members (huntin fool) NEVER provides the draw odds of their various raffle hunts? Hmmmm...a profit motivated private company doesn't share odds on their raffles and they've been doing them for decades...don't worry, business acumen, finance, law etc. are clearly not your strong suits. I'm sure you have other talents though.
Quote from: idahohuntr on July 01, 2019, 09:28:50 PMQuote from: Bushcraft on July 01, 2019, 08:46:17 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on July 01, 2019, 08:29:37 PMIf they were smart AND good stewards of the publics resources they would not update the numbers until after the draw is complete...or not at all. Wrong, on both accounts. At least you're consistent.We already went through the basic math relating to the need to update the numbers. "Whales" or "Mr. Bigs" aren't going to play if they don't know what the odds are. No odds, no whales...substantially less revenue. Not sure why you're having difficulty with the straightforward concept. As to "not at all" posting the number of tickets purchased (that's how you wrote it), WDFW is a public agency and they work for us. Every bleeping dime and action is accountable and should be absolutely transparent, both on the inflows and outflows. To suggest otherwise is delving into big-government-knows-best-pinko-commie territory amigo. Two lines of evidence that do not support your belief that WDFW generates more revenue by posting updated ticket sales:1. People whining their purchases have not been reflected on the ticket sales page quickly enough - a clear and obvious attempt of "whales" to discourage others from purchasing tickets. 2. Virtually no other Western State or private company (e.g., huntin fool) offers real time updates of raffle ticket sales.Your suggestion that no "whales" will participate if they don't know the odds is interesting. Are you suggesting Wyoming, Idaho, Montana etc. don't have "whales" buying loads of raffle tickets? I unequivocally know that to be a false assertion.Good grief. I'm seriously biting my tongue here.You need to take a remedial Logic course idahohunter. Neither of your points are evidence or supportive of your opinion that not updating ticket sales would somehow generate more revenue for the department. Let's paint this picture differently to try and help you to understand. Let's use the lottery. MegaMillions Powerball or whatever it's called.So, take a moment and pause from desperately wanting to be right (or make me appear to be wrong, same difference ) and reflect upon why the lotteries display the increasing value of a given lottery.Why is it that the stores and machines that sell them advertise the updated amount you could win if you played?It's been long since proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the larger the lottery pool, the more people will buy more lottery tickets. Limited transparency into potential payout, and odds of winning, dramatically diminishes participation.When the lottery is a "paltry" $15 million, very few people bother playing. When it builds up to $800 million, LOTS of people play that otherwise wouldn't even remotely consider wasting a buck or two on a lottery ticket. Once that lottery gets up to hundreds of millions, playing at that level is a lark. As a student of human nature, I can tell you that it's a silly phenomenon because either amount would dramatically alter the lives of the winner. Accordingly, why don't people play all the time? Well, due to some oddities of human perception, they are more drawn to the prospects of a potentially larger payout even though they know the odds of winning either are approximately zero.Now, let's shift gears to raffles for something with a fixed payout value. Fixed in the sense that there is an essentially known value of a given item and there is a ceiling on the value of the item. It's not like a lottery that just gets bigger if no one wins. When it comes to the type of raffles like the ones we are discussing, far fewer people with essentially zero chance of winning will still play but they'll only buy a relatively small number of tickets per person. The vast majority will only buy one. That's just the way these things go. That number would change dramatically if it cost $50,000,000 to go on a sheep hunt and the winning raffle ticket was transferable to a willing buyer or redeemable in cash. Understandably, far more people would be willing to take a chance and buy a ticket worth $50MM even if they weren't hunters. But, sheep hunts just don't come anywhere near that coast and there's only a few people - relatively speaking in a state of 7.5MM people, that want to hunt sheep anyway. In fact, it's relatively easy to figure out since all one has to do is look up the number of people that put in for special permit applications, or even raffle tags for that matter. It's a comparatively small percentage of the population. Again, the vast majority of whom, if historical data is any indication will just buy one ticket, even though they could theoretically buy an unlimited quantity.But, if there is some perceived chance at increasing their odds of winning a fixed value raffle, some of the people will carefully weigh the "sure thing" cost of just buying the hunt vs. the risk of a gambling loss. Some will just forego playing, and save up and pay for the hunt outright. Others will have the financial wherewithal to lay down a pile of cash to gain better odds of winning, but they'll only do so up to a point that makes sense to them on a single throw or over a year over year basis. For example, if someone buys 33% percent of the expected number of raffle tickets sold every year, odds are that they'll get it once every three years (with no guarantee of course). They'll likely end up paying a third of the cost, two thirds of the cost or the full cost for a guided hunt. If it's a third...great. If it's two-thirds...nice discount. Full boat...they wanted to go sheep hunting anyway. If their luck totally sucked, they disposable income at that level is such that they can scrape up something and just go. Bottome line is they are just playing the odds with disposable income that they would nototherwise spend at all if they didn't know the odds. The lower the understanding of what the odds are, the lower the interest level in playing. The lower the interest level in playing, the lower amount of disposable income they are going to play with. The lower amount they play with, the lower the revenue generated by the raffle.It's just that simple.
Quote from: Bushcraft on July 01, 2019, 08:46:17 PMQuote from: idahohuntr on July 01, 2019, 08:29:37 PMIf they were smart AND good stewards of the publics resources they would not update the numbers until after the draw is complete...or not at all. Wrong, on both accounts. At least you're consistent.We already went through the basic math relating to the need to update the numbers. "Whales" or "Mr. Bigs" aren't going to play if they don't know what the odds are. No odds, no whales...substantially less revenue. Not sure why you're having difficulty with the straightforward concept. As to "not at all" posting the number of tickets purchased (that's how you wrote it), WDFW is a public agency and they work for us. Every bleeping dime and action is accountable and should be absolutely transparent, both on the inflows and outflows. To suggest otherwise is delving into big-government-knows-best-pinko-commie territory amigo. Two lines of evidence that do not support your belief that WDFW generates more revenue by posting updated ticket sales:1. People whining their purchases have not been reflected on the ticket sales page quickly enough - a clear and obvious attempt of "whales" to discourage others from purchasing tickets. 2. Virtually no other Western State or private company (e.g., huntin fool) offers real time updates of raffle ticket sales.Your suggestion that no "whales" will participate if they don't know the odds is interesting. Are you suggesting Wyoming, Idaho, Montana etc. don't have "whales" buying loads of raffle tickets? I unequivocally know that to be a false assertion.
Quote from: idahohuntr on July 01, 2019, 08:29:37 PMIf they were smart AND good stewards of the publics resources they would not update the numbers until after the draw is complete...or not at all. Wrong, on both accounts. At least you're consistent.We already went through the basic math relating to the need to update the numbers. "Whales" or "Mr. Bigs" aren't going to play if they don't know what the odds are. No odds, no whales...substantially less revenue. Not sure why you're having difficulty with the straightforward concept. As to "not at all" posting the number of tickets purchased (that's how you wrote it), WDFW is a public agency and they work for us. Every bleeping dime and action is accountable and should be absolutely transparent, both on the inflows and outflows. To suggest otherwise is delving into big-government-knows-best-pinko-commie territory amigo.
If they were smart AND good stewards of the publics resources they would not update the numbers until after the draw is complete...or not at all.