collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction  (Read 9357 times)

Offline Jpmiller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 4029
  • Location: Martin, ND
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #30 on: August 04, 2019, 06:18:26 PM »
I'm a little worried they'll get an increase black bear harvest with a statewide 2 bear limit and longer seasons and say "look at this void that's been created on the landscape, let's put in grizzly to fill it".

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #31 on: August 04, 2019, 10:41:19 PM »
I'm a little worried they'll get an increase black bear harvest with a statewide 2 bear limit and longer seasons and say "look at this void that's been created on the landscape, let's put in grizzly to fill it".
I think you got too much faith in the bear hunting, stats are pretty poor even for the spring bear hunt where you'd think hunters would put in a good effort since its a  special tag, but most go unfulfilled

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #32 on: August 21, 2019, 05:07:34 PM »
This is what Conservation NW is sending out. Please send in comments against this nonsense.

“This plan is critical under the Endangered Species Act for restoring a grizzly population in the North Cascades Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone, wildlands anchored by North Cascades National Park and several designated Wilderness Areas.

Encompassing approximately 9,800 square miles, this is one of the largest blocks of public land remaining in the lower 48 states. It’s the only area in the contiguous U.S. outside the greater Rocky Mountains where grizzlies still roam, and the only federally-designated Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone on the West Coast.

The last public input period on the grizzly restoration DEIS garnered more than 120,000 comments, the vast majority supportive of grizzly bear restoration in the North Cascades.

All comments received during the public comment period that was open from January to April 2017 will still be considered. But we need YOU to speak up and submit comments once more! Suggested comments available below.

Federal agencies have proposed four alternative approaches for grizzly bear restoration, including one “No Action” and three action alternatives with a range of options for translocating a number of bears into the North Cascades Ecosystem.

We support Alternative C because we recognize that wildlife agencies must balance grizzly bear biology, ecological function of wildlands and social acceptance of grizzly bear recovery in their decision-making.

In brief, Alternative C would allow wildlife professionals to move up to five grizzly bears per year into the North Cascades for five to seven years, or until a reproducing population of 25 bears is established and can slowly grow naturally.

Opponents of grizzly bear restoration will surely make their voices heard during this final comment period. Those of you who envision a place for the grizzly in our wild North Cascades need to speak up, too!

Feel free to copy and paste our suggested comments, below, into the National Park Service comment form. Please customize your comments if you can!
joe
Sincerely,

Joe-Scott-signature

Joe Scott
International Program Director

Suggested Comments
 

I am writing to express my strong support for grizzly bear restoration in the North Cascades. Grizzly bears once thrived in the North Cascades and are vital to maintaining a complete, ecologically-functional ecosystem. Grizzly bears enhance the backcountry experience and are an important part of our Northwest natural heritage, one that’s on the brink of disappearing.

Specifically, I support Alternative C: Incremental Restoration. Alternative C strikes a sound balance to meet the mutual goals of grizzly bear restoration and the needs of people. I believe grizzly bears will benefit our region’s ecosystems and economies alike, and preserve true wildness for future generations to cherish and enjoy.

Grizzly bear range in the contiguous U.S. has been reduced by 98 percent. Restoring grizzly bears to the Cascades will help to maintain the animal’s distribution on the West Coast (the only Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone outside of the Rocky Mountains). We also know that people and grizzly bears coexist in other areas where the bears are much more abundant, and local economies are supported by tourism, backcountry recreation and ranching to name a few.

Grizzly bears won’t recover on their own because the North Cascades is isolated from larger, more well-connected grizzly bear populations in the U.S. and Canada. In the decades since the grizzly was protected by the Endangered Species Act, grizzlies have not recovered in the North Cascades. Thus, the “No Action” alternative in the DEIS will not suffice to achieve grizzly bear recovery in the Cascades nor will it satisfy the objectives of the EIS process, the responsibilities of federal agencies under the ESA or the national strategy for recovering grizzly bears in the identified Grizzly Bear Recovery Zones.

During your scoping period, the 2017 DEIS comment period, and in recent public polling, broad support has been documented for grizzly bear restoration. Please do the right thing and bring back this native species through the strategy laid out in Alternative C. Alternative C strikes an acceptable balance between the biological and the social sciences. Grizzly bear restoration through Alternative C will restore an important piece of our ecosystem, regional culture and natural heritage.

Thank you,

YOUR NAME”

If you value hunting make comments, we’re already bent over a log with wolves, don’t let them add grizzlies to the mix.

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5553
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #33 on: August 21, 2019, 05:29:43 PM »
It’s open for comment again between July and October.

https://parkplanning.nps.gov/PlanProcess.cfm?projectID=44144
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Online trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19498
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #34 on: August 21, 2019, 05:31:40 PM »
Um, this is a family site so I’ll be nice. HELL NO!  There is nothing endangered about grizzly bears, stupid idea to bring more in our state, stupid!!!!!!!  Comment has been sent.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline HillHound

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2019
  • Posts: 1613
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #35 on: August 21, 2019, 05:52:55 PM »
Comment sent.

Offline Pegasus

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 2093
  • Location: King County
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #36 on: August 21, 2019, 07:18:22 PM »
This is what Conservation NW is sending out. Please send in comments against this nonsense.

“This plan is critical under the Endangered Species Act for restoring a grizzly population in the North Cascades Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone, wildlands anchored by North Cascades National Park and several designated Wilderness Areas.

Encompassing approximately 9,800 square miles, this is one of the largest blocks of public land remaining in the lower 48 states. It’s the only area in the contiguous U.S. outside the greater Rocky Mountains where grizzlies still roam, and the only federally-designated Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone on the West Coast.

The last public input period on the grizzly restoration DEIS garnered more than 120,000 comments, the vast majority supportive of grizzly bear restoration in the North Cascades.

All comments received during the public comment period that was open from January to April 2017 will still be considered. But we need YOU to speak up and submit comments once more! Suggested comments available below.

Federal agencies have proposed four alternative approaches for grizzly bear restoration, including one “No Action” and three action alternatives with a range of options for translocating a number of bears into the North Cascades Ecosystem.

We support Alternative C because we recognize that wildlife agencies must balance grizzly bear biology, ecological function of wildlands and social acceptance of grizzly bear recovery in their decision-making.

In brief, Alternative C would allow wildlife professionals to move up to five grizzly bears per year into the North Cascades for five to seven years, or until a reproducing population of 25 bears is established and can slowly grow naturally.

Opponents of grizzly bear restoration will surely make their voices heard during this final comment period. Those of you who envision a place for the grizzly in our wild North Cascades need to speak up, too!

Feel free to copy and paste our suggested comments, below, into the National Park Service comment form. Please customize your comments if you can!
joe
Sincerely,

Joe-Scott-signature

Joe Scott
International Program Director

Suggested Comments
 

I am writing to express my strong support for grizzly bear restoration in the North Cascades. Grizzly bears once thrived in the North Cascades and are vital to maintaining a complete, ecologically-functional ecosystem. Grizzly bears enhance the backcountry experience and are an important part of our Northwest natural heritage, one that’s on the brink of disappearing.

Specifically, I support Alternative C: Incremental Restoration. Alternative C strikes a sound balance to meet the mutual goals of grizzly bear restoration and the needs of people. I believe grizzly bears will benefit our region’s ecosystems and economies alike, and preserve true wildness for future generations to cherish and enjoy.

Grizzly bear range in the contiguous U.S. has been reduced by 98 percent. Restoring grizzly bears to the Cascades will help to maintain the animal’s distribution on the West Coast (the only Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone outside of the Rocky Mountains). We also know that people and grizzly bears coexist in other areas where the bears are much more abundant, and local economies are supported by tourism, backcountry recreation and ranching to name a few.

Grizzly bears won’t recover on their own because the North Cascades is isolated from larger, more well-connected grizzly bear populations in the U.S. and Canada. In the decades since the grizzly was protected by the Endangered Species Act, grizzlies have not recovered in the North Cascades. Thus, the “No Action” alternative in the DEIS will not suffice to achieve grizzly bear recovery in the Cascades nor will it satisfy the objectives of the EIS process, the responsibilities of federal agencies under the ESA or the national strategy for recovering grizzly bears in the identified Grizzly Bear Recovery Zones.

During your scoping period, the 2017 DEIS comment period, and in recent public polling, broad support has been documented for grizzly bear restoration. Please do the right thing and bring back this native species through the strategy laid out in Alternative C. Alternative C strikes an acceptable balance between the biological and the social sciences. Grizzly bear restoration through Alternative C will restore an important piece of our ecosystem, regional culture and natural heritage.

Thank you,

YOUR NAME”

If you value hunting make comments, we’re already bent over a log with wolves, don’t let them add grizzlies to the mix.

That is nuts. Same story as the wolves. Please note that no option is available to say "NO to ANY Grizzlies in Washington State". These bears were eliminated years ago for a reason. Now with the human population increased 5 fold we want to release these bears back into the state?   

https://www.skinnymoose.com/racktracker/2009/02/04/looking-back-the-last-grizzly-in-washington/

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #37 on: August 27, 2019, 08:31:23 AM »
Conservation Northwest weighs in on grizzly restoration process

“We are confident that the result will be the same as it was prior to the interruption of the process – overwhelming support for grizzly bear recovery in the North Cascades, including from people in areas around the recovery zone,” Conservation Northwest said in the release.

https://methowvalleynews.com/2019/08/07/conservation-northwest-weighs-in-on-grizzly-restoration-process/

I wonder if it isn't already a done deal?



In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only.  s:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #38 on: August 28, 2019, 10:27:57 AM »
Here is the link to submit comments:

https://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkID=327&projectID=44144&documentID=77025

Click the “comment now” button and tell these fools to pound sand.

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 342
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #39 on: October 10, 2019, 10:11:16 PM »
Only 2 weeks left to leave a comment...

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16005
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline sagerat

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 672
  • Location: Blacktail Country
Re: Washington State Grizzly Reintroduction
« Reply #41 on: October 11, 2019, 03:23:10 PM »
Hopefully all of you have voiced your opinion on this!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Amazon won't ship holsters??? by LHaub
[Today at 11:26:17 AM]


No More Federal Land? by Tinmaniac
[Today at 10:59:19 AM]


alkili bull elk permit problems. by brokenvet
[Today at 10:41:07 AM]


Utah backdoor by Ridgerunner
[Today at 09:22:52 AM]


What would you hunt with this ammo? by The Big Game Hunter
[Today at 09:06:44 AM]


Montana 2025 by dreamingbig
[Today at 07:46:17 AM]


Blackstone cooking by Buckjunkie
[Today at 07:04:05 AM]


State FFA award by scotsman
[Today at 05:45:45 AM]


Bear hunting conditions - Chewelah by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 11:01:22 PM]


New fisher looking to catch some pinks this year by RB
[Yesterday at 09:52:28 PM]


Alaska Fishing Guide and Lodge Recommendations by shootem
[Yesterday at 09:16:23 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Timberstalker
[Yesterday at 08:15:40 PM]


Halo by Stein
[Yesterday at 03:31:58 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal