collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction  (Read 1594 times)

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51522
  • Location: E. WA
CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« on: April 23, 2020, 05:17:24 PM »
Quote
The same judge’s decision last year striking down the state’s ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines sparked a week-long buying frenzy before he halted sales while the state appeals his ruling. Gun owners similarly rushed to stockpile ammunition before the new restrictions took effect last summer.

Benitez called the ammunition background check law “onerous and convoluted” and “constitutionally defective.”

“Criminals, tyrants, and terrorists don’t do background checks,” he wrote. “The background check experiment defies common sense while unduly and severely burdening the Second Amendment rights of every responsible, gun-owning citizen desiring to lawfully buy ammunition.”

While it is intended to keep ammunition from criminals, it blocked sales to legitimate, law-abiding buyers about 16% of the time, he wrote. Moreover, he ruled that the state's ban on importing ammunition from outside California violates federal interstate commerce laws.

https://www.kcra.com/article/judge-blocks-california-law-requiring-background-checks-to-buy-ammo/32259333#

 :tup:

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3317
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2020, 12:56:48 AM »
he's wrong on one count- the law was meant to prevent everyone, even lawful people,  from buying ammunition. That way they can refuse people their rights while saying we allow them to buy guns.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51522
  • Location: E. WA
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2020, 01:23:14 AM »
I think you are right, ultimately. However, at this early stage, he is limited in what is considered, and that is taking the state's representations as to it's intent as true.  This is even better, IMO, because he finds that even if that intent is taken as true, the burdens is just so onerous as likely to be ruled unconstitutional.

It is a good day for liberty.

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3317
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2020, 12:54:36 PM »
It is. federal courts have long help making the exercise of a right overly burdomesome so people will stop exercising that right is the same as taking away the right.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10691
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2020, 07:37:30 AM »
The 9th Circuit issued a stay in the District  Court Judge's order. Background checks for ammo sales are now back in play in CA.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51522
  • Location: E. WA
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2020, 08:13:55 AM »
Not before an avalanche of orders hit the books.

:chuckle:

Gotta love the 9th circuit.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2026 North Central WA Mule Deer Foundation Banquet is approaching! by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 10:20:00 PM]


Hornady SST sabots (250 grain copper) by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by hunter100
[Yesterday at 08:37:09 PM]


WDFW proposing to Ban Baiting by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 08:36:24 PM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Tree Killer
[Yesterday at 07:58:24 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by jstone
[Yesterday at 07:48:59 PM]


Small plastic boats? by DaNewb
[Yesterday at 07:14:28 PM]


Delay of commission investigation+Lorna Smith finally defending hunting??? by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:10:09 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by throttlejocky20
[Yesterday at 02:35:47 PM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by JohnVH
[Yesterday at 10:16:47 AM]


25-06 factory loads by lhrbull
[Yesterday at 09:46:55 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 09:35:11 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Machias
[Yesterday at 09:25:40 AM]


That first elk encounter… by Gonehuntin01
[Yesterday at 08:32:47 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal