collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction  (Read 1524 times)

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« on: April 23, 2020, 05:17:24 PM »
Quote
The same judge’s decision last year striking down the state’s ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines sparked a week-long buying frenzy before he halted sales while the state appeals his ruling. Gun owners similarly rushed to stockpile ammunition before the new restrictions took effect last summer.

Benitez called the ammunition background check law “onerous and convoluted” and “constitutionally defective.”

“Criminals, tyrants, and terrorists don’t do background checks,” he wrote. “The background check experiment defies common sense while unduly and severely burdening the Second Amendment rights of every responsible, gun-owning citizen desiring to lawfully buy ammunition.”

While it is intended to keep ammunition from criminals, it blocked sales to legitimate, law-abiding buyers about 16% of the time, he wrote. Moreover, he ruled that the state's ban on importing ammunition from outside California violates federal interstate commerce laws.

https://www.kcra.com/article/judge-blocks-california-law-requiring-background-checks-to-buy-ammo/32259333#

 :tup:

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2020, 12:56:48 AM »
he's wrong on one count- the law was meant to prevent everyone, even lawful people,  from buying ammunition. That way they can refuse people their rights while saying we allow them to buy guns.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2020, 01:23:14 AM »
I think you are right, ultimately. However, at this early stage, he is limited in what is considered, and that is taking the state's representations as to it's intent as true.  This is even better, IMO, because he finds that even if that intent is taken as true, the burdens is just so onerous as likely to be ruled unconstitutional.

It is a good day for liberty.

Offline follow maggie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 3323
  • Location: Fargo
  • Just me, just being a nomad
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2020, 12:54:36 PM »
It is. federal courts have long help making the exercise of a right overly burdomesome so people will stop exercising that right is the same as taking away the right.

Online bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10671
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2020, 07:37:30 AM »
The 9th Circuit issued a stay in the District  Court Judge's order. Background checks for ammo sales are now back in play in CA.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: CA Ammo Background Check - Preliminary Injuction
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2020, 08:13:55 AM »
Not before an avalanche of orders hit the books.

:chuckle:

Gotta love the 9th circuit.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

35 whelen by Rigby416
[Today at 01:18:36 AM]


3 pintails by full choke
[Yesterday at 09:31:40 PM]


Four less by Meathunter06
[Yesterday at 08:15:43 PM]


Report Wolf Sightings Here - Hunting-Washington Wolf Count 158+ by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:50:08 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:39:00 PM]


Building out duck boat by Wetwoodshunter
[Yesterday at 06:56:27 PM]


Banded bluebill by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:16:28 PM]


Weatherby Long Range Steel Choke by M_59
[Yesterday at 05:43:33 PM]


Long Island Hunt by pd
[Yesterday at 03:45:44 PM]


“Recreational trappers”? by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 12:56:37 PM]


Spicy garlic Elk Brats by Norman89
[Yesterday at 12:47:34 PM]


Elk bratwurst by Norman89
[Yesterday at 12:46:56 PM]


Elk breakfast sausage patty’s by Norman89
[Yesterday at 12:46:03 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 10:51:57 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:47:00 AM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by C-Money
[Yesterday at 07:30:24 AM]


Furbearer research project, samples requested, by lewy
[December 20, 2025, 10:48:09 PM]


Nice bachelor herd by Dan-o
[December 20, 2025, 10:41:23 PM]


Coyote hunting with dogs by metlhead
[December 20, 2025, 08:39:32 PM]


GSP Breeders- looking for GSP puppy by SureThing
[December 20, 2025, 08:19:53 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal