collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hancock ?  (Read 6494 times)

Offline scoutdog346

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 515
  • Location: tacoma
Hancock ?
« on: September 17, 2020, 02:09:31 PM »
Hancock is open in gmu 673 right? (Fire danger)

Offline Bowhunter3

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 656
  • Location: Skagit
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2020, 02:38:34 PM »
It was still closed when I left the unit on Tuesday morning.

Offline jae

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 661
  • Location: Cowlitz County
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2020, 03:27:42 PM »
Still closed today.

Offline scoutdog346

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 515
  • Location: tacoma
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2020, 04:34:05 PM »
I can't tell if people r joking around with me.  Os it really still closed because of fire danger?
It was still closed when I left the unit on Tuesday morning.

Offline Alan K

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 3064
  • Location: Lewis County, WA
  • University of Idaho Alumni
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2020, 04:36:59 PM »
By unit I'm guessing he meant GMU when he said leaving the unit, which is only in part made up of Hancock managed lands.

I would just give them a call and ask.  :twocents:

Offline Bowhunter3

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 656
  • Location: Skagit
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2020, 05:38:42 PM »
All Hancock lands around us in 673 were still closed due to fire danger when I left my camp on Tuesday to drive home. Hancock started issuing citations Sunday. A guy in camp talked to the Hancock security and was told they have already had wardens come out seize bulls and arrest people poaching their land. Not joking.

Offline Viking360

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 140
  • Location: Kitsap
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2020, 05:57:42 PM »
Their website sucks, looking for the same info for 506.

Offline Sundance

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 698
  • Location: Kingston
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2020, 08:16:51 PM »
I was told they may stay closed thru muzzy season. They wanted “significant rainfall”

Offline SGTDuffman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Washington
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2020, 10:23:16 PM »
Hancocks phone line says pacific and wahkiakum co will open tomorrow. Likewise Lewis&Clark.

Not that it matters, I was down there (530, 506, 681, 673) from Sat-Wed going on what state land was open, and there were 3 trucks parked in front of every timberland gate trespassing and poaching. Reported who I could, doubt anything will come of it. Covid has all the court systems and jails closed so there are no enforcement actions to take. Warden says they’re trying to keep a list for the landowners so they can ban their access in the future, but I’m not hopeful.

Those people will lose that access for all of us. Lots of folks having campfires on state land too.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2020, 10:28:51 PM by SGTDuffman »

Offline SGTDuffman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Washington
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2020, 10:31:35 PM »
For the interested.

Hancock is 360-795-3653

Offline scoutdog346

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 515
  • Location: tacoma
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2020, 09:38:34 PM »
What do u think the violation would be called if a guy had a ebike on Hancock land and got sighted by wdfw or security?

Offline SGTDuffman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Washington
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2020, 09:58:39 PM »
You’d have to check the sign at a Hancock gate if they allow them or not. The screen cap is from Lewis&Clark. I’d imagine they could probably charge you with trespassing or something though if you violated their rules of entry. They’d probably treat it like they’d treat you camping in there in violation of the signs, Hancock has something on their signs about “motorized access”.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2020, 09:14:52 PM by SGTDuffman »

Offline jae

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 661
  • Location: Cowlitz County
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2020, 07:45:35 PM »
What do u think the violation would be called if a guy had a ebike on Hancock land and got sighted by wdfw or security?
I asked Hancock Security this question last Thursday.
Criminal Trespass and denied access from Hancock.
He said that several timber groups decided this together and they would all honor it.
The security guys name is Dave and he works for Hancock if you want to confirm.
He was calling the Sheriff on a Hunter Huntin during fire season and blocking a gate when we spoke.
Super nice man.
Definitely not worth it to me.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10691
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2020, 07:56:41 PM »
What do u think the violation would be called if a guy had a ebike on Hancock land and got sighted by wdfw or security?
A violation of landowner's regs can be charged under criminal trespass 2nd degree. Same offense as if you entered the land without a permit at all.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 15998
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2020, 08:09:10 PM »
I haven't had the fortune to run into WDFW LEO while I have had my Hancock permit. I Have ran into the security/surveyor Jack of all trades enforcement officer one time. He has so much land to patrol he said he was spread pretty thin. Gave me his cell number and told me if see anything to give him a call.
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5876
  • Location: colville
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2020, 08:11:20 PM »
What do u think the violation would be called if a guy had a ebike on Hancock land and got sighted by wdfw or security?
A violation of landowner's regs can be charged under criminal trespass 2nd degree. Same offense as if you entered the land without a permit at all.

And if riding an ebike is trespassing, then if you actually got an animal while in there on an e bike would it not be unlawful removal of wildlife?  Hunting while trespassing, big game violation, lose hunting rights?

Offline slim9300

  • Democrat = Socialist
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 548
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2020, 05:26:31 PM »
What do u think the violation would be called if a guy had a ebike on Hancock land and got sighted by wdfw or security?
A violation of landowner's regs can be charged under criminal trespass 2nd degree. Same offense as if you entered the land without a permit at all.

And if riding an ebike is trespassing, then if you actually got an animal while in there on an e bike would it not be unlawful removal of wildlife?  Hunting while trespassing, big game violation, lose hunting rights?
Your animal would almost certainly be seized by WDFW. I’m sure you could pay $5-10k in legal fees to get it back. Personally I am glad to see E-bikes (might as well be dirt bikes) get cited and charged with trespassing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Work hard. Be happy. Annoy a Liberal. :wink:
2012 Bowtech Insanity CPXL (Crackerized!) #61/31" DL (Gold Tip Pro ~ 455 grains @ 290 fps = 86 lbs. KE!)
University of Washington; Foster School of Business Alum

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9087
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Hancock ?
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2020, 05:52:05 PM »
What do u think the violation would be called if a guy had a ebike on Hancock land and got sighted by wdfw or security?
A violation of landowner's regs can be charged under criminal trespass 2nd degree. Same offense as if you entered the land without a permit at all.

And if riding an ebike is trespassing, then if you actually got an animal while in there on an e bike would it not be unlawful removal of wildlife?  Hunting while trespassing, big game violation, lose hunting rights?
Your animal would almost certainly be seized by WDFW. I’m sure you could pay $5-10k in legal fees to get it back. Personally I am glad to see E-bikes (might as well be dirt bikes) get cited and charged with trespassing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've had a few foresters leave notes on my truck saying thank you for following access rules.
Also have talked to a few in person behind the gates that have gave me there card and said if I see people breaking access rules to give them a call or email.
They where very professional and very nice people to talk too when you follow the rules. :dunno:
Not only does the e bike fall under the coopertive road closures with WDFW,it's also a huge liability issues .
Logging truck runs you over ,your e bike catches fire and burns x amount of acres and a few houses,ECT.Im sure there is more.

They need to start enforcement of these rules Alot more fines and confiscate e bike,ATV,SXS, I'm sure if your bike may be confiscated you would think twice before riding back there.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by Westside88
[Today at 09:22:43 PM]


Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by hunter399
[Today at 09:01:54 PM]


Discretion !!! by beav1980
[Today at 08:51:01 PM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by jrebel
[Today at 08:43:40 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:39:36 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by Brute
[Today at 08:04:49 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:02:37 PM]


Multi season draw odds by tonymiller7
[Today at 06:43:40 PM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Bunny Thumper
[Today at 06:20:18 PM]


Razor Clams by Sitka_Blacktail
[Today at 04:55:52 PM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by teanawayslayer
[Today at 10:30:39 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:33:49 PM]


Chasing the kids by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:38:39 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by CP
[Yesterday at 07:16:06 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:31:00 PM]


Questions regarding WDFW Commissioner use of taxpayer money by Jake Dogfish
[Yesterday at 06:29:24 PM]


Big game season proposals by Ghost Hunter
[Yesterday at 04:40:21 PM]


Can't miss this girl by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 02:18:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal