collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant  (Read 7886 times)

Offline Twispriver

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 2880
  • Location: Granite Falls and Twisp
Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« on: April 16, 2009, 01:22:11 PM »
This was in the April 15 edition of the Methow Valley News

http://www.methowvalleynews.com/story.php?id=1208

By Joyce Campbell

Three members of Washington’s wild gray wolf pack were observed last week, including the alpha female who “looked to be very pregnant.”

“We saw two collared wolves and one of last year’s pups. They all looked healthy,” said Scott Fitkin, wildlife biologist for the Okanogan District of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Fitkin and regional wildlife biologist Matt Monda were conducting a mule deer survey for WDFW when they spotted the wolves in the Lookout Mountain area near Twisp.

The wolf pack has been monitored by radio telemetry since July 18, 2008, when an alpha male and female pair of gray wolves were captured and fitted with radio collars by a team of state and federal wildlife staff. The same day, a conservation organization’s remote camera captured photos of six pups believed to be the pair’s offspring.

“We’re continuing monitoring with intensive, but non-intrusive ground monitoring to pinpoint the den and pup production,” said Madonna Luers, spokesperson for the WDFW. “Most folks are supportive and appreciative of this natural return of wolves to Washington with this pack.”

Historically, gray wolves were common throughout most of Washington before 1800, according to the draft wolf plan currently being developed by the state wildlife agency. Hunting, trapping and government-sponsored predator control efforts had extirpated gray wolves by the 1930s in Washington state. In one study, the Forest Service estimated that only about 10 wolves in total survived on national forest lands in the state by 1939.

By the 1980s, recorded confirmed observations were infrequent. While collecting grizzly bear data in 1989 for WDFW, Fitkin started getting wolf reports. Most of the reports, particularly the more credible and interesting ones, were from remote locations in the summer in the Pasayten, the Chelan-Sawtooth crest and Twisp River, said Fitkin. There were some good sightings at Ross Lake. He briefly glimpsed and heard the howling of wolves in Black Pine Basin, above Mazama.

In 1989, a team of Canadian biologists from British Columbia met with their American counterparts to let them know that more wolves were being sighted across the border and might show up in Washington, recalled Bill Gaines, forest biologist with the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.

Confirming identification of a pure wild wolf was a problem before the recent introduction of DNA data and technology, said Gaines. He said there were incidents of people releasing hybrid wolf-dogs into the wild and people became skeptical. “It was always a clouded issue,” he said.

To confirm an observation of a rare species on the federal endangered species list, a verifiable record is required, according to forest biologist Bob Naney. With today’s technology, that means a DNA report, a clear photograph or a dead animal.

“Starting two to two-and-a-half years ago, there have been more consistent reports,” said Naney. Before that there were no reports during winter, when biologists thought the wolves would have been at lower elevations near deer winter range.

Most reports were anecdotal, but responses to a howling survey and remote camera photographs led wildlife agencies to radio-collar and monitor a pair of wolf-like canids in the Lookout Mountain area southwest of Twisp last July. DNA samples came back positive for pure gray wolf, genetically connected to wolves in Canada.

“As far as we know, nobody brought them in. They’ve been here since I came here in 1991,” said John Rohrer, biologist for the Methow Valley Ranger District. He said the DNA tests are consistent with wolf samples from southern coastal British Columbia.

“When people say someone drove to Canada to get the wolves, that’s impossible. I don’t buy the rumors,” said Gaines. He said there has been no agency effort to re-introduce wolves into the North Cascades. He said gray wolves are occasionally hunted and trapped just north of the border and have possibly been dispersing for many years based on sightings.

Re-introducing wolves or having no wolves were two options ruled out by the group of citizen and agency stakeholders who began working on Washington state’s draft Wolf Conservation and Management Plan in 2006, according to Fitkin.

“Those were the only two absolutes,” he said.  If re-introduction of wolves had been an option, the animals would have been outfitted with radio collars and we wouldn’t have put them right next to people, said Fitkin.

When a clown moves into a palace he doesn't become a king, the palace instead becomes a circus

I beg to dream and differ from the hollow lies

Trump For $ale - Making Corruption Great Again

Offline Firing Pin

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 196
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2009, 02:16:02 PM »
Great...Just Freaking Great.....  I guess all those successfull years and all the time I've put in could very well be done for.  Nothing like trying to hunt deer that are already spooky!!! >:( >:(
Live today like it's your last!

Offline SuperDave

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 591
  • Location: N.W. Washington
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2009, 05:56:35 PM »
I bet they were doing a mule deer survey!!  3 wolves and no deer!!!  I wonder how much actual time is spent on the wolf study versus mule deer?  Bet I can guess????

Offline beave

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 362
  • Location: buckley
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #3 on: April 19, 2009, 06:45:47 PM »
i was just over there this weekend walking the hills and i did not see one deer. Very disappointing.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2009, 06:41:36 AM »
I love ho w they push their agenda.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2009, 07:11:35 AM »
I've come to the sad realization that washington has become a sanctuary state for predators ala San Francisco and Illegal aliens........... :(
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2009, 07:13:54 AM »
http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov/management/control/predator_booklet.pdf

I picked up this pamphlet last week though Id share.
 :)
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18927
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2009, 01:13:03 PM »
Awesome, now that is how you manage wildlife, never happen here though.  Can you imagine how good it could be here if they managed the wildlife here with that thought process.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2009, 01:32:20 PM by Machias »
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2009, 01:30:45 PM »
Pretty bad ass no doubt about it.
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline M_ray

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 4598
  • Location: I'm takin the 5th on this one
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2009, 01:46:41 PM »
Quote
“Most folks are supportive and appreciative of this natural return of wolves to Washington with this pack.”

Yeah right I'd like to know who most of the folks are? The one's that are tucked away safe in their homes over here on the westside and don't hunt!  :rolleyes:
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are not those of HW Management, Admins, Mods or Myself... But they are the opinions of Elvis who has revealed them to me through the medium of my pet hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...


MB

Growing old is mandatory ... Growing up is optional!

Offline Jake T

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 203
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2009, 06:23:39 PM »
from that pamphlet

"There is no indication from available scientific data that state
sponsored wolf or bear control programs have created conservation
concerns for wolf or bear populations in Alaska. Wolf and bear
populations maintain their ability to increase after control programs
end, even with the continuation of public hunting and trapping."

that is beautiful.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2009, 06:28:36 PM »
That was exactly the line I was referring to Mray when I said that.   

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2009, 08:27:58 PM »
 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

 :tup:
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2009, 07:00:38 AM »
Found three of them elsewhere yesterday.  Not sure what constitutes a pack.  *censored*es :rolleyes:

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Lookout Pack's alpha female appears pregnant
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2009, 07:28:53 AM »
The genocide in Idaho is getting ready to roll and I can't wait :)
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by jackelope
[Today at 08:09:12 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Today at 08:03:05 PM]


Desert Sheds by blindluck
[Today at 07:40:17 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Today at 07:35:40 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Today at 07:21:41 PM]


Nevada Results by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 05:13:20 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Today at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Today at 02:55:25 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Today at 01:42:41 PM]


F250 or Silverado 2500? by 7mmfan
[Today at 01:39:14 PM]


Is FS70 open? by yajsab
[Today at 10:13:07 AM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Jpmiller
[Yesterday at 09:28:01 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal