collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed  (Read 2443 times)

Offline TRD1911

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Silverdale
Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« on: February 22, 2021, 04:58:56 PM »
I'm looking at submitting my spring bear application today and looking at units that I can double for scouting/setting up cams for archery elk season. Unit 638 seems appealing but I'm seeking clarification on the boundary regulations -

"7020   Copalis   GMU 642, 648, and 638 (excluding U.S. Forest Service lands).   50   April 15 - June 15   515 / 2.32"

When looking at 638 using my OnX chip, it looks like 90% of the unit is Olympic National Forest while the remaining 10% is Rayonier in the southwest corner of the unit. Typically I wouldn't seek clarification but it just doesn't make sense; does the Olympic National Forest fall under "Forest Service Lands"? If so, did they exclude this massive portion of the unit to focus on damage control hunts on Rayonier? If that's the case that seems like a pay to play scheme for that unit. I always select Kitsap and Mason for spring bear but neither hold elk (or are specialty hunts only) and looking to use my time wisely. Thanks for your help.

Offline Grizzlybuiltcontracting

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2019
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: Port Angeles
  • Groups: RMEF, BHA, WSTA, F4WM
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2021, 12:09:29 PM »
I'm looking at submitting my spring bear application today and looking at units that I can double for scouting/setting up cams for archery elk season. Unit 638 seems appealing but I'm seeking clarification on the boundary regulations -

"7020   Copalis   GMU 642, 648, and 638 (excluding U.S. Forest Service lands).   50   April 15 - June 15   515 / 2.32"

When looking at 638 using my OnX chip, it looks like 90% of the unit is Olympic National Forest while the remaining 10% is Rayonier in the southwest corner of the unit. Typically I wouldn't seek clarification but it just doesn't make sense; does the Olympic National Forest fall under "Forest Service Lands"? If so, did they exclude this massive portion of the unit to focus on damage control hunts on Rayonier? If that's the case that seems like a pay to play scheme for that unit. I always select Kitsap and Mason for spring bear but neither hold elk (or are specialty hunts only) and looking to use my time wisely. Thanks for your help.

I have hunted that unit in the past. Yes you are correct, Forest Service is the same thing as National Forest , so in 638 you are limited to Rayonier land and they do not offer an access permit for that area. They do offer access to the Rayonier land in the other units, and you pretty much do get full rein of the other two units. It is pretty much a pay to play deal. Its mostly all Rayonier or other privately owned land down there. It is also hard to hunt because it is very flat, and doesnt give you much glassing distance, or visibility.
As for the Kitsap  and Mason areas there is a lot of state/public access land, however the the area is really populated so you would be hunting near houses, and I think it is limited to archery gear. (Im not sure about the archery gear though, so dont quote me on it.)
I hope this helps you.
Good luck this spring

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14554
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2021, 12:31:25 PM »
From what I remember, the Rayonier permit for that hunt is only good for a dates for that specific hunt.  If you wanted to scout ahead of time, you would need a different permit (non-hunting) that would be good for Jan -July.  If you 'scouted' for deer/elk while you were on the bear hunt, and then wanted to hunt them later on you would need the hunting permit that covers Aug-Dec.

Offline TRD1911

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Silverdale
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2021, 12:53:06 PM »
Thanks for clarification. I don't understand the limitation on hunting public land for this area. We have a more than healthy bear populatipn....but, I digress. Looks like I'll be putting in for mason/kitsap again

Offline Aginor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2020
  • Posts: 93
  • Location: Kitsap County
  • https://caltopo.com/m/B201
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2021, 02:22:18 PM »
Have you ever been successful in Kitsap or Mason?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline TRD1911

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Silverdale
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2021, 02:27:17 PM »
Have you ever been successful in Kitsap or Mason?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have. Let know if you need some pointers.

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1511
  • Location: Shelton, wa
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2021, 02:56:05 PM »
Thanks for clarification. I don't understand the limitation on hunting public land for this area. We have a more than healthy bear populatipn....but, I digress. Looks like I'll be putting in for mason/kitsap again

Because spring bear is supposedly about helping the timber companies. I mean tons and tons of accessible timber land in 648. Really wish we had a season in 636 but o well
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline TRD1911

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Silverdale
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2021, 03:11:14 PM »
Thanks for clarification. I don't understand the limitation on hunting public land for this area. We have a more than healthy bear populatipn....but, I digress. Looks like I'll be putting in for mason/kitsap again

Because spring bear is supposedly about helping the timber companies. I mean tons and tons of accessible timber land in 648. Really wish we had a season in 636 but o well

Agreed but shouldn't the timber companies then wave the gate fees in their areas to encourage success rates? I know I'm probably opening a can of worms for no reason since I'm hanging out in the loser-lounge for spring bear this year, ha!

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1511
  • Location: Shelton, wa
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2021, 03:22:35 PM »
I mean green diamond doesn’t charge for access to their property in 648. Gates are hike into only but still free in that area. I was going to call GD and Manke, mostly cause I deal with them a lot, on pointers of where to hunt if I drew the Copalis tag. Same if I was in Mason. In kit sap not so aure
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline Aginor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2020
  • Posts: 93
  • Location: Kitsap County
  • https://caltopo.com/m/B201
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2021, 03:24:33 PM »
I could definitely use some tips. I live in Kitsap, but in the firearm restriction area, so I haven’t even bothered applying here. The DNR land I’ve been to was loaded with people which I figured made it hopeless

Offline TRD1911

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 373
  • Location: Silverdale
Re: Unit 638 Spring Bear Clarification Needed
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2021, 04:20:43 PM »
I could definitely use some tips. I live in Kitsap, but in the firearm restriction area, so I haven’t even bothered applying here. The DNR land I’ve been to was loaded with people which I figured made it hopeless

Message sent

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

DR Clips and Braided Mainline by metlhead
[Today at 02:46:10 PM]


New bear hunter questions! by TitusFord
[Today at 02:40:45 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by TT13
[Today at 02:23:51 PM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 01:54:31 PM]


Heartbroken!!! by pianoman9701
[Today at 01:27:20 PM]


Best 20 degree and under sleeping bags? by vandeman17
[Today at 01:08:24 PM]


AUCTION: Custom knife by Alden Cole by Dan-o
[Today at 01:03:07 PM]


Got your bear ID test done..🤟 by finnman
[Today at 12:55:32 PM]


Muckleshoot/white river forest hunting permits by jnichols
[Today at 12:36:40 PM]


Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming by JDHasty
[Today at 12:23:22 PM]


More Kings! by CP
[Today at 12:03:59 PM]


Eastern Gray Squirrels by Elk_Guapo
[Today at 10:56:17 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:52:21 AM]


Pork belly street tacos….. by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:47:20 AM]


Hoof Rot by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 08:45:58 AM]


2025 Canning by 3boys
[Today at 08:40:04 AM]


Muzzleloader scope options by dc
[Today at 06:21:44 AM]


10 years ago- Now by blindluck
[Today at 06:18:02 AM]


Muzzleloader Scope by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:10:23 AM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 10:11:48 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal