collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)  (Read 8058 times)

Offline high_hunter

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 422
  • Location: Skagit Co.
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2021, 02:09:36 PM »
Left a comment as well.  It's a very misleading title and deffinately needs to be a 2 part question. 

Sportsmen and WDFW should focus time /efforts on improving hunt opportunities,  not limit tags and impose burdensome mandatory pelt sealing restrictions.
Take one new person out hunting every year.

Contact me for blood tracking needs in the Wa PNW--Skagit, Snohomish, Island, and Whatcom Counties

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9097
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2021, 02:13:28 PM »
All I'm saying is
SPRING!!!!SEASON!!!!!!!
OTC SPRING SEASON!!!!!!!!!

Offline RB

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3082
  • Location: Arlington, washington
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2021, 03:17:02 PM »
Done! My comment was make it OTC to enable youth to participate in either Bear, or Turkey in the spring!
IAFF #3728

Offline Alan K

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 3066
  • Location: Lewis County, WA
  • University of Idaho Alumni
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2021, 03:52:20 PM »
Bear populations withstood bait, hounds, trapping, bounties, etc. just fine for decades and decades. There is ZERO justification for giving up anything for more opportunity, especially after 25 years of a booming population above what was already sustainable.. The success of boot hunting, particularly on the west side, is so miniscule compared to the population you could increase the current bag limit AND have a March 1 to November 15 season and not put a dent in it.  :twocents:

Offline Buzz2401

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1205
  • Location: Shelton
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2021, 05:40:58 PM »
Pretty much the only change I see is a reduction from 10 to 6 bears in the Long Beach area.  Doesn't seem like that big of a deal and maybe it is needed down there.  Not a big proponent for WDFW but doesn't seem like anything to get in a big uproar about. A 4 tag reduction isn't that big a deal and if they only did that one unit then it was probably needed.  The pelt requirement isn't new for 2022.

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 12262
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2021, 06:33:59 PM »
I have to agree with the comments above:
1.  WDFW worded the question to get the response they have already decided upon.
2.  If you don't vote and leave a comment, you can't complain.

...did my civic duty today, for whatever it's worth... :P
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12861
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2021, 06:36:35 PM »
Bear populations withstood bait, hounds, trapping, bounties, etc. just fine for decades and decades. There is ZERO justification for giving up anything for more opportunity, especially after 25 years of a booming population above what was already sustainable.. The success of boot hunting, particularly on the west side, is so miniscule compared to the population you could increase the current bag limit AND have a March 1 to November 15 season and not put a dent in it.  :twocents:
Agree 100%

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline elksnout

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1410
  • Location: Washougal, Wash
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #22 on: September 29, 2021, 09:20:54 PM »
Added my nickel's worth.

elksnout
Can't we all just get along?

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9097
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2021, 07:03:16 AM »
 :bumpin:
I Agree with almost every comment on this topic so far.
Bear Population Boom
Lost Hunter Opportunities
Hunter Heritage for future.
And many more!!!!!!!!

We need more comments in there. Anti's have biologists,researchers,study's,lawyers,and money to burn.
Hunters have basically nothing to prove our claims.
More comments the better.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 20141
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2021, 08:01:19 AM »
Bear populations withstood bait, hounds, trapping, bounties, etc. just fine for decades and decades. There is ZERO justification for giving up anything for more opportunity, especially after 25 years of a booming population above what was already sustainable.. The success of boot hunting, particularly on the west side, is so miniscule compared to the population you could increase the current bag limit AND have a March 1 to November 15 season and not put a dent in it.  :twocents:
Hope you don’t mind but I copied and pasted your comment to my comment on my email to Wdfw. 
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline dilleytech

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 1718
  • Location: Columbia gorge washington
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #25 on: October 01, 2021, 06:59:26 AM »
Pretty much the only change I see is a reduction from 10 to 6 bears in the Long Beach area.  Doesn't seem like that big of a deal and maybe it is needed down there.  Not a big proponent for WDFW but doesn't seem like anything to get in a big uproar about. A 4 tag reduction isn't that big a deal and if they only did that one unit then it was probably needed.  The pelt requirement isn't new for 2022.

And last year they took away tags as well. And next year they will try to take away more. Have you learned nothing about losing things in the last few years?

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50686
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #26 on: October 01, 2021, 08:31:30 AM »
Comments left.  That was nice of sportsman to hook us up with a nice link

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom & Mortgage Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45948
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, OR & GA NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #27 on: October 01, 2021, 08:51:25 AM »
Commented.

"Spring tag numbers should by allocated according to population statistics, as proper game management is supposed to operate. The population of bears statewide has increased each year since the banning of baiting, and the incidence of human-bear conflict has increased accordingly. Not only should the number of tags in a unit not be decreased by 40%, more units and tags should be added to spring bear opportunities to minimize human-bear conflict and the current stress on ungulate offspring, most notably fawns. This proposed change does not coincide with proper and accepted game management practices. As such, I strongly oppose these changes."
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34471
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #28 on: October 01, 2021, 09:09:48 AM »
Done, and I was civil too

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3616
Re: Comment on Spring Bear Proposal(2022)
« Reply #29 on: October 01, 2021, 09:33:24 AM »
Done.  I also kept it civil...despite the absurdity of spring season not being OTC with the bear populations what they are in WA.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Best state for trophy whitetail or Canada? by greenhead_killer
[Today at 07:35:05 AM]


Help me understand youth moose by snit
[Today at 07:19:13 AM]


Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by huntnnw
[Today at 06:45:30 AM]


Big game season proposals by hughjorgan
[Today at 05:50:15 AM]


Now we wait(Montana) by Wingin it
[Today at 05:21:59 AM]


Multi season draw odds by JakeLand
[Today at 04:26:56 AM]


300 savage 99 f rotary magazine reinstall issue by Night goat
[Today at 02:03:44 AM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by locdown21
[Today at 12:01:34 AM]


Second Choice by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:05:12 PM]


New Wetside Hunter by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 10:03:18 PM]


Sky Rover Binoculars. Alpha glass, bargain price. by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 08:10:20 PM]


2026 North Central WA Mule Deer Foundation Banquet is approaching! by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 07:38:23 PM]


12th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:08:01 PM]


Ouchie momma UTAH by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 07:04:30 PM]


FWC Smith and Rowland sharing documents to media while under investigation by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:44:17 PM]


2026 regs are out by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:41:51 PM]


Backyard Bobcat Bait by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 04:10:12 PM]


Hound puppies $300 by aclark
[Yesterday at 02:52:23 PM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by cmp150
[Yesterday at 01:50:56 PM]


Breakfast entertainment by 10Key
[Yesterday at 01:17:33 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal