collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Removing the Snake River dams  (Read 9752 times)

Offline jeffro

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 903
  • Location: Camano Island
Removing the Snake River dams
« on: June 17, 2022, 02:59:50 PM »
Haven’t seen this discussion here?
I think it the is dumbest idea to cross Inlee and Murrays feeble minds.
How do you justify removing 1000 megawatts of power from the grid
And still push for electric cars
At a cost of ~30 billion to replace the black out hole?
Not to mention the irrigation and transportation of 1/3 of this states agriculture crops to market,
Don’t forget Idaho also!
All with the reasoning of saving the Puget Sound Orcas,
Those fish don’t swim here, stupid a**es

Edit: I fish the Snake at least once a year out of Heller Bar,
Catch tons of fish

Rant over
One shot. One kill!

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16001
  • Location: Over the edge
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline jeffro

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 903
  • Location: Camano Island
One shot. One kill!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21756
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2022, 04:34:05 PM »
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline MeepDog

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2021
  • Posts: 715
  • Location: SE Washington
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2022, 05:40:39 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 18864
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2022, 06:17:40 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

So our energy costs can soar.🤬

https://www.synapse-energy.com/sites/default/files/SynapsePaper.2008-07.0.Nuclear-Plant-Construction-Costs.A0022_0.pdf
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9266
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2022, 07:55:17 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

Let’s go Brandon!!!!!
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14545
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2022, 08:13:45 PM »
It's sounding like the hydroelectric reservoirs in a few parts of the country are getting so low that they may go off line.  That electricity will have to be replaced by another source.  I'm guessing there could be some electricity shuffled around this summer.  How much will rates go up?  Anything noticeable and most people will tell the salmon and orcas to just pound sand.

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5378
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2022, 08:15:12 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

It doesnt bother you about losing 8% of our states power production?

You mention the Nuke plant at Handford and the huge amount of power it makes, I AGREE, THATS GREAT!...problem is... the powers that be have already determined that when that plants worn out they wont build another nuke plant, too expensive.

How do you feel about the whole horse heaven skyline being dotted with windmills?

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9266
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2022, 08:24:47 PM »
The simple fact that people think that the salmon population is more important than the recreation, transportation, power, irrigation and other benefits of the damn is absolutely mind boggling to me.

How about these lazy liberal f$cks address the predators that are hammering the salmon?

Stupid liberals.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline HunterStrait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 441
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2022, 09:08:26 PM »
Are salmon and steelhead no longer important?

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9266
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2022, 09:35:16 PM »
Plenty important; the dams are just far more important than those giant stocked trout.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8997
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2022, 09:44:02 PM »
The simple fact that people think that the salmon population is more important than the recreation, transportation, power, irrigation and other benefits of the damn is absolutely mind boggling to me.

How about these lazy liberal f$cks address the predators that are hammering the salmon?

Stupid liberals.

"Stupid liberals" is one thing but in the interest of an honest conversation...

1) The sockeye are native and are probably only several generations from extinction.

2) the smolt of the fish that go all the way up the Snake River just spend too much time in slow waters to sustain populations.

Here is how I think of it: will the dams be necessary in 1000 years? 100 years? 30? If the answer to any of those is not "yes", why is it so wrong to talk about it now?

Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5378
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2022, 09:52:37 PM »
Why not rip out Bonneville, Jon Day, TheDalles and McNary first? Fish gotta swim through those first before they get to the Snake river.

How about we get rid of the nets up and down that section of the columbia too? Seems a bit easier to try that first.

All those windmills by Goldendale and along the horse heavens...they only work in concert WITH dams, not instead of them.

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9266
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2022, 10:32:06 PM »
Will removing the dams help the salmon?  Absolutely!

Tell me the repercussions of removing them is worth it.

Give me an honest justification.

It’s not the good old days. Gone are the days of “native” salmon fishing with high numbers of fish.
The nets, seals, terns, cormorants, Indians, etc are far more damaging than the concrete.

I’ll wait.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Yesterday at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal