collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Removing the Snake River dams  (Read 10662 times)

Offline jeffro

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 925
  • Location: Camano Island
Removing the Snake River dams
« on: June 17, 2022, 02:59:50 PM »
Haven’t seen this discussion here?
I think it the is dumbest idea to cross Inlee and Murrays feeble minds.
How do you justify removing 1000 megawatts of power from the grid
And still push for electric cars
At a cost of ~30 billion to replace the black out hole?
Not to mention the irrigation and transportation of 1/3 of this states agriculture crops to market,
Don’t forget Idaho also!
All with the reasoning of saving the Puget Sound Orcas,
Those fish don’t swim here, stupid a**es

Edit: I fish the Snake at least once a year out of Heller Bar,
Catch tons of fish

Rant over
One shot. One kill!

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16223
  • Location: Over the edge
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline jeffro

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 925
  • Location: Camano Island
One shot. One kill!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21864
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2022, 04:34:05 PM »
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline MeepDog

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2021
  • Posts: 722
  • Location: SE Washington
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2022, 05:40:39 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19233
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2022, 06:17:40 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

So our energy costs can soar.🤬

https://www.synapse-energy.com/sites/default/files/SynapsePaper.2008-07.0.Nuclear-Plant-Construction-Costs.A0022_0.pdf
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9301
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2022, 07:55:17 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

Let’s go Brandon!!!!!
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14562
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2022, 08:13:45 PM »
It's sounding like the hydroelectric reservoirs in a few parts of the country are getting so low that they may go off line.  That electricity will have to be replaced by another source.  I'm guessing there could be some electricity shuffled around this summer.  How much will rates go up?  Anything noticeable and most people will tell the salmon and orcas to just pound sand.

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5487
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2022, 08:15:12 PM »
The politics can be ignored for this topic. 1000Mw isn't that crazy. Columbia Generating Station on the hanford site puts out 1200MW on its own and has a tiny footprint. Those dams are suffocating that river and have turned the river into prime habitat for the warm water invasive species. The real issue is that grain farmers have gotten used to easy irrigation and barges to ship their produce for cheap. On top of all that, the built up sediment at the base of the dams could choke the river if released all at once. Do I still think we should do it? Heck yeah. The snake should flow like the Hanford reach not stagnate in big pools.

It doesnt bother you about losing 8% of our states power production?

You mention the Nuke plant at Handford and the huge amount of power it makes, I AGREE, THATS GREAT!...problem is... the powers that be have already determined that when that plants worn out they wont build another nuke plant, too expensive.

How do you feel about the whole horse heaven skyline being dotted with windmills?

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9301
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2022, 08:24:47 PM »
The simple fact that people think that the salmon population is more important than the recreation, transportation, power, irrigation and other benefits of the damn is absolutely mind boggling to me.

How about these lazy liberal f$cks address the predators that are hammering the salmon?

Stupid liberals.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline HunterStrait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 448
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2022, 09:08:26 PM »
Are salmon and steelhead no longer important?

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9301
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2022, 09:35:16 PM »
Plenty important; the dams are just far more important than those giant stocked trout.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9012
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2022, 09:44:02 PM »
The simple fact that people think that the salmon population is more important than the recreation, transportation, power, irrigation and other benefits of the damn is absolutely mind boggling to me.

How about these lazy liberal f$cks address the predators that are hammering the salmon?

Stupid liberals.

"Stupid liberals" is one thing but in the interest of an honest conversation...

1) The sockeye are native and are probably only several generations from extinction.

2) the smolt of the fish that go all the way up the Snake River just spend too much time in slow waters to sustain populations.

Here is how I think of it: will the dams be necessary in 1000 years? 100 years? 30? If the answer to any of those is not "yes", why is it so wrong to talk about it now?

Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5487
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2022, 09:52:37 PM »
Why not rip out Bonneville, Jon Day, TheDalles and McNary first? Fish gotta swim through those first before they get to the Snake river.

How about we get rid of the nets up and down that section of the columbia too? Seems a bit easier to try that first.

All those windmills by Goldendale and along the horse heavens...they only work in concert WITH dams, not instead of them.

Offline Timberstalker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 9301
  • Location: Tri-Cities
  • Just one more ridge
Re: Removing the Snake River dams
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2022, 10:32:06 PM »
Will removing the dams help the salmon?  Absolutely!

Tell me the repercussions of removing them is worth it.

Give me an honest justification.

It’s not the good old days. Gone are the days of “native” salmon fishing with high numbers of fish.
The nets, seals, terns, cormorants, Indians, etc are far more damaging than the concrete.

I’ll wait.
If you aint hunting, you aint livin'

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

From Behind by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 05:28:41 PM]


Coyote hunting with dogs by Angus
[Today at 05:25:20 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by CP
[Today at 04:32:25 PM]


The first Moose tags. by Southpole
[Today at 04:27:19 PM]


Eastern Elk Management by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 04:04:02 PM]


Idaho Non-res hunt draw by kodiak06
[Today at 04:02:16 PM]


My Wenaha bull by Whitenuckles
[Today at 03:29:46 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by Whitenuckles
[Today at 03:24:18 PM]


My daughters first deer. by Whitenuckles
[Today at 03:22:51 PM]


One of my favorites this fall by jrebel
[Today at 03:17:20 PM]


Looking for Red Hot Replacement Muzzleloader Nipple 2 SKU: M900013 by Westside88
[Today at 03:10:28 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by 7mmfan
[Today at 02:23:56 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 01:42:33 PM]


Moose in western washington? by Okanagan
[Today at 01:06:31 PM]


Last day! Don’t leave us hanging by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:03:26 PM]


One of my Wowzhers by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:56:37 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by buddy01
[Today at 12:49:16 PM]


MT general tag filled by kirkl
[Today at 12:40:09 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:39:53 PM]


Sharp Teeth & Hand Calls! by rainshadow1
[Today at 12:21:46 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal