Free: Contests & Raffles.
Now, here's the gray area...He/she sees you with pistol trained on an animal he can't see. You shoot. You miss that Grouse. Fly's off. He/she could ticket you for shooting at a Deer, (that he couldn't see), during Bow season/witout proper harvest tag. So, you had better aim well and recover that Grouse. -Steve
Not trying to be argumentative but I don't think this is a a gray area.
Well, I'm not all the hot on how the new law is written and think this will be challenged soon. The new law discriminates against the person that does not have a conealed carry permit. Washington is an 'Open Carry' state. Always has been. But that's a different argument. So, if a hunter has a pistol and bow legally in their posession during any Deer/Grouse season, I feel that any judge would have to realise that if you have a pistol trained on a Grouse, at that point in time, you are a Grouse hunter. Not a Deer hunter. It is legal to harvest Grouse with a pistol. (Just shoot the head off!)-Steve
I'm a bow hunter, so when I see a grouse I like to shoot it with my bow. The idea of harvesting an animal with my bow is the ultimate experience. Back to the idea if it is legal or not, I would say no. For personal protection does not include grouse, unless that grouse is in the process of stalking you for the purpose of killing you. I don't know how far the "In fear of your life" thing applies. I'm carrying a pistol with me this year, just like every year. I'm not going to let a law get in the way of my personal safety and the safety of my hunting buddies.