collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Fish Trap on cedar Creek  (Read 6227 times)

Offline O. Nerka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2018
  • Posts: 100
  • Location: Winthrop, WA
Re: Fish Trap on cedar Creek
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2024, 08:14:40 PM »


While I agree with much of what chuckardog posted. I'd argue with a few things. I've volunteered at hatcheries since I was in high-school. I watched the guys bonk every oversized fish while picking a 5 or 6 pounder to breed with a 5 or 6 pounder. Small fish bred to small fish make small fish, genetically speaking. Ever wonder why the Quinault fish hatchery pumps out fish regularly over 20 pounds?
But I digress, we are doomed. With the anti-hatchery folks, tribal fisheries, trawl fisheries, intercept fisheries, cormorants and of course seals, sea lions and WDFW continuously forcing all sports anglers into one stream or another until that streams run collapses we are all but done. I don't know what the fix is. I wish someone has/had a magic bullet.

Man, I've spent 8 years working in hatcheries and I never once saw the attitude of picking the small fish for broodstock. Much more typically it was something along the lines of " look at the size of that guy we can use him 3 or 4 times!!"

Offline ASHQUACK

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 1041
Re: Fish Trap on cedar Creek
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2024, 04:56:37 AM »


While I agree with much of what chuckardog posted. I'd argue with a few things. I've volunteered at hatcheries since I was in high-school. I watched the guys bonk every oversized fish while picking a 5 or 6 pounder to breed with a 5 or 6 pounder. Small fish bred to small fish make small fish, genetically speaking. Ever wonder why the Quinault fish hatchery pumps out fish regularly over 20 pounds?
But I digress, we are doomed. With the anti-hatchery folks, tribal fisheries, trawl fisheries, intercept fisheries, cormorants and of course seals, sea lions and WDFW continuously forcing all sports anglers into one stream or another until that streams run collapses we are all but done. I don't know what the fix is. I wish someone has/had a magic bullet.

Man, I've spent 8 years working in hatcheries and I never once saw the attitude of picking the small fish for broodstock. Much more typically it was something along the lines of " look at the size of that guy we can use him 3 or 4 times!!"
I don't know, just the two hatcheries I helped at. I asked one of the guys specifically why they were just bonking and tossing the big chinooks into a fish bin. The answer I got was that big fish were more prone to having genetic defects and diseases. I also truly believe that net mesh sizes have a very negative effect on returning fish sizes. Bigger mesh only catches and kills bigger fish. Any way we look at it dead fish don't spawn. Whether they are killed in the hatchery, nets or a wood shampoo on a sporty boat or river bank. Dead is dead and not reproducing.

Offline chukardogs

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 458
  • Location: Shoreline
Re: Fish Trap on cedar Creek
« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2024, 08:26:55 AM »
I found a very good article from 1991 debating the hatcheries vs wild fish. It's interesting to read 30 odd years later and think about the things they (the scientist) believed back then that came to fruition and the things that didn't.

  UW experts debate what’s best for fish: wild runs or hatcheries
BY SANDRA HINES | PHOTOS BY GREGORY T. RUGGERONE | DEC. 1991 ISSUE

In the article, Donaldson indicates that to supply the number of fish that the world needs, (yes, it ain't all about us here in the northwest) hatcheries are it! There's no going backwards and it would be nice if certain individuals with dreams of rivers full of wild fish and a landscape covered with wild animals like deer, elk, moose, Wolves, Cougars, Black Bears, Grizzly Bears, Wolverines....etc. understood this. The idea that man can back up time without removing a large plethera of humans at the same time is absurd. Man is here, deal with it!
 Instead of trying to figure out ways to move backwards, how about ya dreamers figure out how man is going to thrive through the next millennium.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by pickardjw
[Today at 11:12:40 AM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by JohnVH
[Today at 10:16:47 AM]


Now we wait(Montana) by Mtnwalker
[Today at 10:12:22 AM]


25-06 factory loads by lhrbull
[Today at 09:46:55 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by Rigby416
[Today at 09:35:11 AM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by buglebuster
[Today at 09:25:59 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Machias
[Today at 09:25:40 AM]


That first elk encounter… by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 08:32:47 AM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by 30.06
[Today at 08:22:28 AM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Liroy
[Today at 03:58:58 AM]


September Mule Deer in the High Country by basedacid
[Yesterday at 09:35:22 PM]


Small plastic boats? by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 07:10:47 PM]


Hoof rot by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:23:05 PM]


ITA Clean-Up Fur Sale by Trapper John
[Yesterday at 01:46:08 PM]


Spring bear 2026 by calahanhuntingco
[Yesterday at 12:57:38 PM]


Turkey Fan/beard Plaques by fire*guy
[Yesterday at 11:45:41 AM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by hunterednate
[Yesterday at 11:01:48 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal