collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW'S new photo direction  (Read 26637 times)

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50684
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #15 on: February 02, 2024, 08:48:15 AM »
IN honesty it was a budgeting move.   Typically wildlife photographs of that quality come from wildlife photographers.   They paid handsomely for those images.  Then some brainiac came up with photo contests where everyone can submit and every photo submitted becomes their property.   Well, they had to switch formats a bit to compensate for what was being submitted. 

Offline raydog

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 892
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #16 on: February 02, 2024, 09:02:08 AM »

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4498
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #17 on: February 02, 2024, 09:58:00 AM »
They're caving in to pressure from the anti crowd and wdfw's very own employees.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9070
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #18 on: February 02, 2024, 10:35:23 AM »
They're caving in to pressure from the anti crowd and wdfw's very own employees.
That sounds like a winner,winner.... venison dinner.

Most likely be a bear or cougar on the cover. Who knows!
Not saying bear or cougar on cover is bad.
But it would be a little ironic, considering opportunities being cut.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2024, 10:51:21 AM by hunter399 »

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #19 on: February 02, 2024, 11:00:13 AM »
Lots of other very pro hunting states use live animals for cover photos. Idaho, MT, WY, etc. We all love to hate on wdfw and especially the commission but this is hardly a sky is falling moment :twocents:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10657
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2024, 11:00:48 AM »
.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline MeepDog

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2021
  • Posts: 705
  • Location: SE Washington
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2024, 11:15:46 AM »
This is a non issue. Just switching it up and boneaddict might be onto something. Better quality photos from wildlife photographers. They don't want your Snapchat screenshots of screenshots.

Offline LDennis24

  • Bear poker
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5437
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2024, 11:30:14 AM »
So your saying they won't use my submission?  :chuckle:

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+25)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11561
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2024, 11:32:37 AM »
Here is a good one from from a few years ago. 

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8854
  • Location: CDA/CQ
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2024, 12:15:01 PM »
 :rolleyes:


Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9070
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #25 on: February 02, 2024, 12:27:34 PM »
This is a non issue. Just switching it up and boneaddict might be onto something. Better quality photos from wildlife photographers. They don't want your Snapchat screenshots of screenshots.
I agree many others have high quality shots.
They also own your photo after you submit.

Not sure if that's a turnoff for some :dunno:

Even my crappy ,screenshot of a screenshot,cell pic,trail cam , 💩 photos are still my own.
Reason I didn't submit anything.

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16379
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #26 on: February 02, 2024, 02:12:16 PM »
They're caving in to pressure from the anti crowd and wdfw's very own employees.
That sounds like a winner,winner.... venison dinner.

Most likely be a bear or cougar on the cover. Who knows!
Not saying bear or cougar on cover is bad.
But it would be a little ironic, considering opportunities being cut.
I recall a cover with a black bear previously and also one with a cougar IIRC.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9070
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #27 on: February 02, 2024, 02:18:32 PM »
They're caving in to pressure from the anti crowd and wdfw's very own employees.
That sounds like a winner,winner.... venison dinner.

Most likely be a bear or cougar on the cover. Who knows!
Not saying bear or cougar on cover is bad.
But it would be a little ironic, considering opportunities being cut.
I recall a cover with a black bear previously and also one with a cougar IIRC.
Ya I think your right.
Did they shorten the season those years. I can't remember.
I'm not gonna say what's right or wrong on the cover.
They can put whatever they like,I would think our biologists would have plenty of photos.
Like said,bear or cougar is not bad,just a little ironic under the new changes coming up.
It what's inside that's important.


« Last Edit: February 02, 2024, 02:39:29 PM by hunter399 »

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9070
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #28 on: February 02, 2024, 02:36:35 PM »
Maybe one of those woodland caribou that doesn't exist anymore. :chuckle:

Maybe a wolf or a grizzly bear.
Boy that would stir some pots.
On both sides of every coin.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2024, 03:00:13 PM by hunter399 »

Offline KNOPHISH

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 1588
  • Location: Auburn
Re: WDFW'S new photo direction
« Reply #29 on: February 02, 2024, 02:56:23 PM »
Maybe one of those woodland caribou that doesn't exist anymore. :chuckle:

Maybe a wolf or a grizzly bear.
Boy that would stir some pots.

Yep, I was just thinking of the caribou they didn’t even try to save, but save a predator? Tho the live pic debate doesn’t bother me.
I have Man Chit to do

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Not fact checked, but I can relate. by pianoman9701
[Today at 01:05:56 PM]


New Zealand in May by RatRodMike
[Today at 01:03:47 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by cedarriver
[Today at 12:40:09 PM]


CCW response to FWC Melanie Rowland's op-ed by 30.06
[Today at 10:14:50 AM]


Shoot or No Shot 2026, Episode #3 by salmosalar
[Today at 09:30:36 AM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by cavemann
[Today at 08:23:20 AM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by bearpaw
[Today at 08:15:49 AM]


Muzzle loading shotguns? Educate me by Night goat
[Today at 06:55:49 AM]


Top recommended elk hunt gear items.... by Alchase
[Today at 06:54:58 AM]


What pants are you guys rocking in the peninsula? by BigGoonTuna
[Today at 02:41:07 AM]


Gun Storage in Unconditioned Space by jackelope
[Yesterday at 07:31:09 PM]


Fun video to listen to by pashok23
[Yesterday at 06:39:50 PM]


Grouse hunting .22 pistol? by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 05:43:21 PM]


Almost a wrap #2 by pashok23
[Yesterday at 01:42:38 PM]


Almost a wrap #1 by pashok23
[Yesterday at 01:41:26 PM]


Almost a wrap #3 by BKMFR
[Yesterday at 01:26:20 PM]


20Ga Load Testing - Need different shells by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 12:18:23 PM]


Almost a wrap #4 by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 11:43:53 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal