collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 578 Indian land  (Read 6341 times)

Offline Whitefoot

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 279
  • Location: YAKAMA NATION
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2024, 08:59:38 AM »
Everybody should be in tune with what’s going on in 578 with the Yakima tribe trying to take over the majority of this unit voices need to be heard and or some type of presence.

Yakama is the tribe.  Yakima you're talking about the town.
Cayusm

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2024, 09:43:51 AM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5626
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2024, 04:19:11 PM »
What about the town yakimas 170 miles away from Glenwood. What’s wrong with the 800,000 acres that tribe already has

They wanted the land the treaty apparently gave them, not less.  Who wouldn’t ?

Offline Shooter4

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: spokane
  • Groups: kuiu
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2024, 05:20:04 PM »
That dispute was settled and I think $2.1 million was given to the tribe to relinquish all rights to what we refer to as Tract D, which takes in Glenwood, and so they accepted the money, ceded all rights to it.

Offline BUTTER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 367
  • Location: CAMAS
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #19 on: November 22, 2024, 08:07:52 PM »
Not sure where your getting your news from Shooter but this is old news. The supreme court made the ruling it's a done deal. It's already over they have been allowing the state to continue allowing hunting on the land until approx. this coming season

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2673
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 578 Indian land
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2024, 09:40:18 PM »
@Shooter4 who are your grandparents?  Wondering because I live here in Trac D.  As decided a couple years back, the Glenwood Valley is within the interior bounderies of the Yakima Nation.  Outside of the decades old water issue, I've seen no changes in hunting or fishing on private or state land unless you count cats, bears, wolfs and hoof rot :)
Matthew 6:33

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

WWF at it again by pianoman9701
[Today at 12:42:03 PM]


RMEF Banquet 2026 by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 12:22:21 PM]


What pants are you guys rocking in the peninsula? by jackelope
[Today at 12:13:26 PM]


What to do?? by Encore 280
[Today at 11:16:25 AM]


Snoqualmie Tree Farm - 2026 Passes by HillHound
[Today at 10:57:34 AM]


Offseason blues by HillHound
[Today at 10:22:51 AM]


Holy Smokes what a shock!! by hunter399
[Today at 07:00:53 AM]


Very old eyes. by opdinkslayer
[Today at 06:25:29 AM]


Elk pastrami by hunter399
[Today at 04:39:47 AM]


Pellet patio heater in a wall tent by Night goat
[Yesterday at 07:26:20 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by MLhunter1
[Yesterday at 05:30:14 PM]


St Patrick’s day by C-Money
[Yesterday at 03:29:42 PM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by OltHunter
[Yesterday at 02:42:47 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by steeleywhopper
[Yesterday at 01:12:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal