collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Corridors legislation  (Read 153 times)

Online Moose Master

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 3122
Corridors legislation
« on: Today at 08:44:50 AM »
Washington Hunters Called On To Help Push Wildlife Corridor Coordination Bill Across Line In Olympia - https://share.google/2M1ibqYHu93cs8weG

Here's some info about a bill for wildlife

Online dwils233

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 620
  • Location: Spokane County
Re: Corridors legislation
« Reply #1 on: Today at 09:56:14 AM »
Washington Hunters Called On To Help Push Wildlife Corridor Coordination Bill Across Line In Olympia - https://share.google/2M1ibqYHu93cs8weG

Here's some info about a bill for wildlife

It really is a good bill, with little cost. It also creates accounts where ngos can pocket and amass money that can only be used for wildlife crossing, which is super helpful to build a kitty for those projects and pooling resources.

If you don't want to use the BHA action alert, you can just go straight to the leg pages.

Sign in "pro" here: https://app.leg.wa.gov/csi/Testifier/Add?chamber=House&mId=33941&aId=170362&caId=28201&tId=3

Submit written testimony is support here: https://app.leg.wa.gov/csi/Testifier/Add?chamber=House&mId=33941&aId=170362&caId=28201&tId=4
A promise made is a debt unpaid, and the trail has its own stern code

Offline hughjorgan

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2484
  • Location: Wilbur
Re: Corridors legislation
« Reply #2 on: Today at 10:52:14 AM »
The legislature needs to fix our failing bridges before considering this type of legislation.

Online dwils233

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 620
  • Location: Spokane County
Re: Corridors legislation
« Reply #3 on: Today at 12:04:30 PM »
The legislature needs to fix our failing bridges before considering this type of legislation.

so that's actually an interesting point. Right now, if they are working on a construction project (like a failing bridge), there's no WSDOT requirement for them to consider any modifications or design features that ensure the new bridge is less bad for connectivity. This bill creates an efficiency so that at the same time they look at the failing bridge, they look at improvements in the repair/replacement for wildlife benefit. It also creates the account where money for those improvements can pull from.

yes, we have failing infrastructure that need fixing. Yes, it's a slow process with a huge backlog. But it's also wildly cost-inefficient to fix those things without considering that you can kill two birds with one stone without tying $ up from WSDOT money to hit that second bird.
A promise made is a debt unpaid, and the trail has its own stern code

Offline HUNTINCOUPLE

  • Lost Somewhere on the Praire of Klickitat Co. Chasing The Elusive BENCHLEG DEERS.
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 8178
  • Location: Lyle WA, 98635
  • Yep, my avatar is from my front porch. #2835
Re: Corridors legislation
« Reply #4 on: Today at 12:09:42 PM »
I definitely approve adding wildlife crossings to every bridge. As this will help all hunters manage predators.  :tup:
Slap some bacon on a biscut and lets go, were burrnin daylight!

Most peoples health is a decision not a condition?

Kill your television!  ICEMAN SAID TO!

Life Member of Hunting  Washington  Forum.

Time in the woods is more important than timing the moon.

Offline hughjorgan

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 2484
  • Location: Wilbur
Re: Corridors legislation
« Reply #5 on: Today at 12:50:56 PM »
The legislature needs to fix our failing bridges before considering this type of legislation.

so that's actually an interesting point. Right now, if they are working on a construction project (like a failing bridge), there's no WSDOT requirement for them to consider any modifications or design features that ensure the new bridge is less bad for connectivity. This bill creates an efficiency so that at the same time they look at the failing bridge, they look at improvements in the repair/replacement for wildlife benefit. It also creates the account where money for those improvements can pull from.

yes, we have failing infrastructure that need fixing. Yes, it's a slow process with a huge backlog. But it's also wildly cost-inefficient to fix those things without considering that you can kill two birds with one stone without tying $ up from WSDOT money to hit that second bird.

 :tup: Signed in Pro

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal