Free: Contests & Raffles.
Here is why I think it is legal (or at least why you will not be cited), if you do not have .22 ammunition in your possession.A few months ago, a student in one of our hunter education classes asked if it was legal to hunt with a shotgun capable of holding four rounds. Of course we said "no". He then proceeded to tell us that he had just purchased a new Remington 870 3 1/2" 12 gauge shotgun, and the magazine held THREE 2 3/4" shells. I didn't believe him at first, but I went to the Remington website and confirmed his story.Legal or not? I asked several enforcement officers, and went to the Lt. level of WDFW Enforcement. The verdict: technically the gun is not legal, because it is capable of holding four rounds. However, if the hunter only has 3 1/2" ammunition in his possession, he will not be cited. If he has 2 3/4" ammunition in his possession, he will be cited.Of course, you may encounter an enforcement officer that disagrees and cites you anyway. I think you would have a very strong case if you did not have .22 ammunition. It is not illegal to have a .22 in your possession. It is illegal to HUNT with it. How can you be hunting without ammunition?
Yes, while duck hunting. They checked my shotgun's magazine to see if it would hold more than 2 shells.
Quote from: bobcat on April 29, 2010, 09:50:43 AMYes, while duck hunting. They checked my shotgun's magazine to see if it would hold more than 2 shells.How did they do it? Just ask you to put 2 shells in and try to put a 3rd or did they take your gun and try themselves or ?? I've always just got the "can i see your license" and "have you got anything".. from them in the past. Now that I've said that I'm sure I'll get checked this fall!
How did they do it? Just ask you to put 2 shells in and try to put a 3rd or did they take your gun and try themselves or ??