collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: America's Great Outdoors Initiative - Seattle Public Listening Session - Summary  (Read 2451 times)

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1050
  • Location: KITCO
Earlier this evening several Federal Government Agencies held a town hall meeting("Listening Session.." - Obama) at Franklin High School in Seattle from 6:30 to 9:30.
This meeting was for Obama's 'America's Great Outdoors Initiative'. http://www.doi.gov/americasgreatoutdoors/
Representatives were present from the NPS, DOI, EPA, USFS, USDA, and the USFWS.

I must say that I'm excited about what took place at this meeting, but I'm really damn tired too, long work day for me. I'll finish this summary sometime tomorrow, sry to leave you guys hangin'.  :P  I'll briefly say.....it was actually a very good event, there were several surprises(least to me there were) and I've come away from the meeting with a great deal of optimism towards the protection of our hunting rights and the management of our federal lands. This meeting did not by any means change my opinion about the real intent of the administrations environmentalist ambitions. I'm still just as skeptical of the administrations intended environmental goals. My optimism came from what I observed while listening to the comments made by the many Washingtonians that attended the event and the whole discussion that we had.

more to follow.....

Hope you all have a fun 4th of July weekend  :llam:
RMEF

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1050
  • Location: KITCO
Yeah OHV got f'd out of this. Every ant and elephant that has a to-do with the outdoors had honorable mention except OHV. I didn't hear one engine in the video except maybe a few boats.
__________________________________________________________________________

Unlike the above link, we did not have any public conversations before the group break out session.

At registration we were handed our pamphlets and a name tag. We then took our seats in the auditorium. A tribal elder blessed the event. Several federal employee's from the various agencies spoke, including one well versed and passionate high school student. Then we watched a short video from The Obama, lights kicked on; little more talking, then it was announced that the little number on our name tags represented a room number. Off we shuffled to our classrooms.

Each classroom had about 25 people in it, not sure how many rooms or how many people attended in total. 250-300  :dunno: The classes were lead by three federal agency employee's. One lead the discussion, a second assisted the lead and the third recorded everything on a computer, he took down our names, represented organizations(if any) or our reason for being there, and our comments. This was all displayed on a projector so we could see that our conversations were being recorded word for word. 4 questions were asked:

- What conservation strategies have worked?
- What are the obstacles to conservation and connecting people to the outdoors?
- How can Federal Agencies be better partners?
- What new conservation tools are needed?

I think we hashed out those four questions for about 1hr 45min or so. Then everyone hugged and we went home.
The federal agencies involved are to compile all of this public feedback into a report and present it to El Presidente.

That's the short and sweet of it. Public comment in the beginning would have been bad juju. I'm not sure why they did it in LA. At the Seattle meeting I could sense many people had attended expecting to spat at each other for the evening. The speakers did a good job of kicking that vibe down and getting the message out that we were all going to have a say and we were all going to play nice and be constructive. It was a show of good leadership....all except the administration official, don't recall his name. The NPS, DOI, EPA people gave that more, 'this really matters to me vibe', I think this had more to do with who the are as individuals rather than the agencies they work for. No directors were in attendance(that gulf oil thing you know), mostly assistant/deputy directors.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2010, 12:53:20 PM by haus »
RMEF

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
  THANK YOU for going, and the news on it!!
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1050
  • Location: KITCO
...continued.

Prior to the start of the meeting I just evesdropped on conversations and checked out the crowd of attendies. I wanted to get an idea of how this event was going to go down. Based on what I heard I figured it was going to get heated.
Meeting Notes:
- NGO's, Non-Government Organizations.....
- It was difficult to gauge how much representation there was from the various interests. I'd say all had some amount of representation. Hiking/mountain climbing groups had the most representation via several NGO's. ORV groups had a good presence too.
- I did see an SCI sticker on a truck parked near mine, but I never found another hunter in attendance so I'm not sure how many of us were there. Did anyone else from Huntwa attend or know another hunter that did?
- The expected division between the many NGO's, specifically environmental groups vs. ORV groups was apparently. Just listening in to some of the pre-meeting conversations I'd expected they were going to challenge each other to an arm wrestlin' match during the meeting  :chuckle:

The mood shifted as the government officials went through their speeches.....They delivered the message well. IMHO these were people that really care about our outdoors and they would genuine like to see American's renew their interest in the outdoors as a majority. Their message was clear, 'we're here to listen to all of you and we want input from all outdoor interests...........except ORV  :chuckle: The speakers mentioned ORV recreation many times despite the fact that the Administration has left it out of the video and most of the talking points.

I was caught off guard when they said everyone would have an opportunity to share their views and that we would be split into groups. I ended up being the only hunter in my group of about 25 people.
List of the composition of the group I was in:
1 person from:
- a Yakima River fly fishing conservation org
- an ORV group that primarily focused on Tahuya Forest.
- leaders/presidents from a scuba diving group, a kayaking group, and a group thats focused on the Nisqually Wildlife Refuge
- a member of a group from the Castle Rock area, I don't recall the exact name of the group...maybe Mt. St. Helens rescue :dunno:
multiple people:
- Two board members from the Sierra Club.
- Several people from hiking and mountain climbing groups.
- several people from the Historical Society and city parks groups.
- there were about four people from various environmental groups that I don't recall the name of and
- There were a few Seattleites that were mainly focused on city parks.
- Including a couple good lookin' college ladies from UW  :drool:  :chuckle:

Our groups' discussion started out a little slow.....mostly the Seattleites were talking about needing more government funding for Puget Sound environmental projects and City Parks. After this initial conversation of socialism and federal hand feeding the more seasoned outdoor recreation types started to speak up. I was a little surprised by what they were saying because their concerns are the same concerns we've had in the hunting community for quite some time. Some of their comments were:
"the problem is the federal government",
"we can't get permits from the Fed to even take school kids on trips into the NF's",
"access is limited and causing congested",
 "our society is so fast paced that limitations in access are detering interest",
"certain designations such as Wilderness area's deter interest because some usergroups are excluded"
"the NGO's have the money and time, we just need the federal government to work with us"
"the Fed should hand the national forests over to the State"
 "the Fed shouldn't have ownership of the Mt. St. Helens area.",
"The NGO's need to work together".
« Last Edit: July 21, 2010, 12:01:24 PM by haus »
RMEF

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1050
  • Location: KITCO
....continued.

Some members of the Sierra Club mentioned that SC is working on reaching out to hunters and fishermen, they've formed a committee within SC specifically for that effort......grain of salt  :dunno: I think they want us to join their fight against the ORV groups. I'll pass :D


Thats it guys n gals, whats your thoughts? Any questions lemme know  :)
« Last Edit: July 30, 2010, 10:43:53 AM by haus »
RMEF

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
....continued.

I spoke with both members of the Sierra Club after the discussion was over. During the meeting they had made a few comments and I was supportive of those comments too. They explained to me that the Sierra Club is working on reaching out to hunters and fishermen, they've formed a committee within SC specifically for that effort......grain of salt  :dunno: I think they want us to join their fight against the ORV groups. I'll pass :D


Thats it guys n gals, whats your thoughts? Any questions lemme know  :)



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



HR 3534
Great American Outdoors Initiative Land Grab
Dear Jim,
 


After attending a couple of listening sessions in Montana  about the Great American Outdoors Initative it was clear these listening sessions where staged and conducted only for the purpose of the administration to claim they listened to the people. The Land and Water Conservation fund will bankroll the taking of more private property by our federal government and pad the pockets of land trusts like the Nature Conservancy and World Wildlife Fund.


Please take the time to weigh in on the following link to voice your support for multiple use access for recreation, active forest management and responsible resource development.


Private land transferred to government ownership takes land off the tax rolls and hurts local economies.




CARA Comes Back As The CLEAR Out Of Rural America Act

(HR 3534)

 

It's a Monster $1 billion per year automatic off budget land acquisition trust fund attached to HR 3534 in the House, called The

Consolidated Land, Energy, And Aquatic Resources Act of 2010 otherwise known as the Clear Act.

 

We don't have a Senate number yet but you don't need that.  Just ask for Harry Reid's Energy Bill with the Land and Water Conservation Trust Fund inside.

 

You can vote and comment on these proposals now by going to:
 

Vote and Comment

http://ideas.usda.gov/ago/ideas.nsf/ProductMostRecent?openview


-----The Obama American's Great Outdoors Initiative will be looking
at all kinds of new Federal areas and tools for regulatory land use
control. Some examples are:
 
Giant new Wildlife Corridors covering several states and connecting
existing parks and other areas.
Numerous new and expanded Wilderness Areas
A massive $5 billion per year off budget land acquisition trust fund
More use of eminent domain
More condemnation of private land and homes
A huge increase in land use regulations
More environmental regulations
Many more National Monuments
New National Trails
New National Heritage Areas
New National Parks
New Wild and Scenic Rivers
New National Lakeshores
New National Scenic Areas
New National Seashores
New National Recreation Areas
New National Grasslands
New National Preserves
National Historic Areas
New Greenways
New Viewsheds
New Soundsheds
New Airsheds (air controls on industry)
New scenic byways with land use controls
 
The list goes on. There will be more.
 
Working together, we can stop these proposals.
 
You can vote and comment on these proposals now by going to:
 
Comment and Vote
« Last Edit: July 27, 2010, 04:59:31 AM by Elkaholic daWg »
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline haus

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1050
  • Location: KITCO
and there you have it. One of those bills alone would result in a significant expansion of Federal regulatory power over the states and private citizens. What a load of bs. November can't get here soon enough.
RMEF

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6067
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
 Thought about starting new topic, but some may not remember this conversation so I thought I'd bring this one back. there is a thread on this in the Washington For Wildlife section also

From CBU this morning...........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citizens for Balanced Use
Obama to speak on Great American Outdoors
Dear Jim,

 

Thursday, February 17, 2011, President Obama will deliver remarks at the White House on the America's Great Outdoors initiative.  President Obama established the America's Great Outdoors initiative on April 16, 2010, and charged the Secretaries of the Departments of the Interior and Agriculture, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality to develop a 21st century conservation and recreation strategy based on the priorities of American communities. You are invited to watch the event, which will be broadcast live on www.whitehouse.gov/live at 4:45pm EST, 2:45pm MST.

 

This message was sent to CBU from 

Jack Shapiro

Deputy Associate Director for Policy Outreach

Council on Environmental Quality

He can be reached at JShapiro@ceq.eop.gov

 

The Great American Outdoors Initiative will have a significant impact on federally managed lands in Montana. It is quite possible that the President may designate additional National Monuments in Montana along with the new executive directive from the Secretary of Interior, Ken Salazar, to inventory BLM lands which would qualify for "Wildlands" designation. 

 

CBU believes the proposed policies and directives by the Executive branch of our government could lock away millions of acres in Montana from energy development and multiple use recreation.

 

It will be very interesting to see how the President spins his proposal.   

 

 

 
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal