collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage  (Read 2487 times)

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« on: July 16, 2010, 03:20:06 PM »
I've been told that it's harmful to leave your optics on anything other than it's lowest power when not using them, but not why or what could happen if you did.  Example, with a scope of 3-9x40, you should store it on 3X, not anywhere between 4 to 9X.  Any truth to this rumor, and any idea what would happen? 
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5801
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2010, 03:34:07 PM »
First time I have heard this - but interested in hearing everyone else's feedback.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2010, 03:55:35 PM »
that is plain old silly. don't leave it in the oven, don't leave it in the pool, don't worry about the magnification setting.....or focus for that matter.

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12169
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2010, 03:57:43 PM »
mine are always carried on the lowest setting, so they seem to always get put away on the lowest setting, i have never heard that before, call the manufacturer and ask em  :dunno:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2010, 04:06:25 PM »
it is good practice to carry on a power that works for your application and area.....you would not have your scope on 20x in the brush, but it is far from going to harm the scope. unless you smash it aganst a tree because you missed a booner because you were zoomed in so tight you could not tell if it was an ear or vitals.

Offline Austrian Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 4491
  • Location: Yakima, WA
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2010, 04:23:41 PM »
it is good practice to carry on a power that works for your application and area.....you would not have your scope on 20x in the brush, but it is far from going to harm the scope. unless you smash it aganst a tree because you missed a booner because you were zoomed in so tight you could not tell if it was an ear or vitals.

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2010, 04:43:15 PM »
that is plain old silly. don't leave it in the oven, don't leave it in the pool, don't worry about the magnification setting.....or focus for that matter.

That's kind of what I was thinking.  I just couldn't understand why this would cause a problem.  My buddy that told me this is a pretty smart guy, but couldn't explain why this would cause any harm.  I'm not exactly Mr. Maggoo, but I still need to use them on 6X or better, and usually leave them on that.  Glad to hear I'm not nuts.
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bucket List Elk shed help wanted by MADMAX
[Today at 07:29:23 AM]


Discretion !!! by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:43:22 AM]


Multi season draw odds by Mfowl
[Today at 03:27:12 AM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by EnglishSetter
[Today at 01:40:23 AM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 11:23:14 PM]


2026 Sportsmen for Conservation Fund Banquet Hosted by SCI Northwest Chapter by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 10:45:45 PM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by jrebel
[Yesterday at 08:43:40 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:39:36 PM]


Your biggest spike elk by Brute
[Yesterday at 08:04:49 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 08:02:37 PM]


Razor Clams by Sitka_Blacktail
[Yesterday at 04:55:52 PM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:30:39 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Dan-o
[April 03, 2026, 11:33:49 PM]


Chasing the kids by MADMAX
[April 03, 2026, 07:38:39 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by CP
[April 03, 2026, 07:16:06 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Mfowl
[April 03, 2026, 06:31:00 PM]


Questions regarding WDFW Commissioner use of taxpayer money by Jake Dogfish
[April 03, 2026, 06:29:24 PM]


Big game season proposals by Ghost Hunter
[April 03, 2026, 04:40:21 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal