collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage  (Read 2347 times)

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« on: July 16, 2010, 03:20:06 PM »
I've been told that it's harmful to leave your optics on anything other than it's lowest power when not using them, but not why or what could happen if you did.  Example, with a scope of 3-9x40, you should store it on 3X, not anywhere between 4 to 9X.  Any truth to this rumor, and any idea what would happen? 
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2010, 03:34:07 PM »
First time I have heard this - but interested in hearing everyone else's feedback.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2010, 03:55:35 PM »
that is plain old silly. don't leave it in the oven, don't leave it in the pool, don't worry about the magnification setting.....or focus for that matter.

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12175
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2010, 03:57:43 PM »
mine are always carried on the lowest setting, so they seem to always get put away on the lowest setting, i have never heard that before, call the manufacturer and ask em  :dunno:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2010, 04:06:25 PM »
it is good practice to carry on a power that works for your application and area.....you would not have your scope on 20x in the brush, but it is far from going to harm the scope. unless you smash it aganst a tree because you missed a booner because you were zoomed in so tight you could not tell if it was an ear or vitals.

Offline Austrian Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 4491
  • Location: Yakima, WA
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2010, 04:23:41 PM »
it is good practice to carry on a power that works for your application and area.....you would not have your scope on 20x in the brush, but it is far from going to harm the scope. unless you smash it aganst a tree because you missed a booner because you were zoomed in so tight you could not tell if it was an ear or vitals.

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2010, 04:43:15 PM »
that is plain old silly. don't leave it in the oven, don't leave it in the pool, don't worry about the magnification setting.....or focus for that matter.

That's kind of what I was thinking.  I just couldn't understand why this would cause a problem.  My buddy that told me this is a pretty smart guy, but couldn't explain why this would cause any harm.  I'm not exactly Mr. Maggoo, but I still need to use them on 6X or better, and usually leave them on that.  Glad to hear I'm not nuts.
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:44:18 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Wanttohuntmore
[Yesterday at 10:14:01 PM]


Seekins PH3 by Hitsman3
[Yesterday at 08:21:48 PM]


Mule Deer Management Zones by Swervingtrouts
[Yesterday at 07:53:26 PM]


Degreasing A Deer Skull by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 07:03:57 PM]


Is it a conflict of interest by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:42:37 PM]


Smelt ? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 06:27:35 PM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by Fastass350
[Yesterday at 06:23:00 PM]


Late Achery Hunt 💥VIDEO💥 by DWAT
[Yesterday at 06:08:24 PM]


This year, last year by C-Money
[Yesterday at 05:41:15 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by luvmystang67
[Yesterday at 05:30:13 PM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by muleyguy
[Yesterday at 05:28:37 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by Broomd
[Yesterday at 05:24:20 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 03:59:08 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by castnblast
[Yesterday at 03:14:07 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by kentrek
[Yesterday at 02:46:41 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:40:16 PM]


Archery world in Lacey has any good deal before closing? by eddyr
[Yesterday at 12:59:25 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 11:46:01 AM]


Homemade saltwater fishing gear by metlhead
[Yesterday at 11:17:01 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal