collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage  (Read 2330 times)

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« on: July 16, 2010, 03:20:06 PM »
I've been told that it's harmful to leave your optics on anything other than it's lowest power when not using them, but not why or what could happen if you did.  Example, with a scope of 3-9x40, you should store it on 3X, not anywhere between 4 to 9X.  Any truth to this rumor, and any idea what would happen? 
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2010, 03:34:07 PM »
First time I have heard this - but interested in hearing everyone else's feedback.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2010, 03:55:35 PM »
that is plain old silly. don't leave it in the oven, don't leave it in the pool, don't worry about the magnification setting.....or focus for that matter.

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12174
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2010, 03:57:43 PM »
mine are always carried on the lowest setting, so they seem to always get put away on the lowest setting, i have never heard that before, call the manufacturer and ask em  :dunno:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2010, 04:06:25 PM »
it is good practice to carry on a power that works for your application and area.....you would not have your scope on 20x in the brush, but it is far from going to harm the scope. unless you smash it aganst a tree because you missed a booner because you were zoomed in so tight you could not tell if it was an ear or vitals.

Offline Austrian Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 4491
  • Location: Yakima, WA
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2010, 04:23:41 PM »
it is good practice to carry on a power that works for your application and area.....you would not have your scope on 20x in the brush, but it is far from going to harm the scope. unless you smash it aganst a tree because you missed a booner because you were zoomed in so tight you could not tell if it was an ear or vitals.

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Re: Leaving optics on less than lowest power in storage
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2010, 04:43:15 PM »
that is plain old silly. don't leave it in the oven, don't leave it in the pool, don't worry about the magnification setting.....or focus for that matter.

That's kind of what I was thinking.  I just couldn't understand why this would cause a problem.  My buddy that told me this is a pretty smart guy, but couldn't explain why this would cause any harm.  I'm not exactly Mr. Maggoo, but I still need to use them on 6X or better, and usually leave them on that.  Glad to hear I'm not nuts.
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Late season in gods Country My big buck by blindluck
[Today at 11:45:55 AM]


Best service for estimating draw odds by Bob33
[Today at 11:35:23 AM]


Beavertail 1800??? by BD1
[Today at 10:58:07 AM]


Old recessed buck by High Climber
[Today at 10:44:35 AM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:38:01 AM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by HikerHunter
[Today at 09:33:47 AM]


Cowichie muzzy bull this year by buglebuster
[Today at 09:06:47 AM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by bustedoldman
[Today at 07:51:52 AM]


High n Dry gear by metlhead
[Today at 06:26:26 AM]


Colockum WMA chukar hunting by metlhead
[Today at 06:19:26 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by trophyhunt
[Today at 04:29:19 AM]


Long distance love affair by high_hunter
[Today at 12:21:14 AM]


The Okanogan Deer Book by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 09:20:53 PM]


Idaho deer question by Tbob
[Yesterday at 08:20:43 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by 10thmountainarcher
[Yesterday at 07:21:33 PM]


Diarrhea ? by Knocker of rocks
[Yesterday at 06:39:31 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 06:19:55 PM]


Big Bull Elk Hit On Hwy 970? by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 06:19:23 PM]


My wife found her first shed by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 05:18:09 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 05:16:50 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal