collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: using illumanock in Wa  (Read 108540 times)

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6017
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #480 on: October 03, 2011, 09:03:48 PM »
Time to rename this thread Can-O-Worms.  I think we've heard every argument that should be heard more than once, and 10x as many that never should have been brought up.  Let it die.
Ya it is starting to sound like Obumbles and his Crew!

Sisu, that was a below the Obama  belt.... :chuckle:

Offline Lowedog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2625
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #481 on: October 03, 2011, 09:09:52 PM »
Time to rename this thread Can-O-Worms.  I think we've heard every argument that should be heard more than once, and 10x as many that never should have been brought up.  Let it die.
Ya it is starting to sound like Obumbles and his Crew!

Oh no not Obumbles!   :rolleyes:
"Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal."
— Aldo Leopold

Offline STIKNSTRINGBOW

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4366
  • Location: Chehalis
    • https://www.facebook.com/stiknstring.bow
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #482 on: October 04, 2011, 06:57:12 AM »
thats right ! you can keep your "Change"





i
The mountains are calling and I must go."
- John Muir
"I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order."
- John Burroughs
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor Trainer

Offline Lowedog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2625
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #483 on: October 04, 2011, 09:18:15 AM »
ughh...me fear change...change bad  :tung:

"Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal."
— Aldo Leopold

Offline BEARHUNTER1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: statup,wa.
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #484 on: October 05, 2011, 06:36:43 PM »
IF YOU DONT LIKE IT THEN DONT USE IT !!! BE PROUD OF WHAT YOU LIKE AND DO AND LEAVE OTHERS BE!!! BE LEGAL AND GOOD LUCK!!! :)

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #485 on: October 08, 2011, 05:28:09 PM »
i picked up some of the firefly nocks today (WA legal lighted nock) and they seem pretty cool, dont show up in normal day light. but show real well when shooting in lower light.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25034
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #486 on: October 09, 2011, 01:45:20 PM »
you got a www for that product BB? Couldn't find it on the web..
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14541
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #487 on: October 09, 2011, 01:52:34 PM »

Here SpecialT
I just looked at the Sterner Duttera Fire Fly glowing nocks and it is the answer for everyone!  :)

http://www.sternerduttera.com/store/firefly_glowing_nocks_stay_lit.asp

Offline Snapshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 721
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #488 on: October 13, 2011, 09:46:30 AM »
It's okay Rooselk, I really didn't think you had a reasonable explanation for that question anyway. I have read P&Y's rules of fair chase and if our seasons are regulated in compliance with their rules, why does Washington allow baiting? Or is this "being ridiculous" too?

Just to make it known to those who have not read them, Pope & Young's Rules of Fair Chase don't say anything whatsoever about baiting... ???

And if someone killed a helpless animal and stated as much on their P&Y entry form it would be denied inclusion in that record book.
I'd just like to remind everybody that it's about the hunting, not just the killing. In other words, it's about the total experience, the sport itself and the challenge involved. Bowhunting, done right, is a justifiable and honorable pursuit. Done for the wrong reasons, simply chalking up kills and seeking personal glory, it's taking away rather than giving back to a principled way of life that has to be experienced to be understood. G.StCharles

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44707
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #489 on: October 13, 2011, 09:48:19 AM »
It's okay Rooselk, I really didn't think you had a reasonable explanation for that question anyway. I have read P&Y's rules of fair chase and if our seasons are regulated in compliance with their rules, why does Washington allow baiting? Or is this "being ridiculous" too?

Just to make it known to those who have not read them, Pope & Young's Rules of Fair Chase don't say anything whatsoever about baiting... ???

According to the woman with whom I spoke at the Reg. 5 office, this is a loophole in the regs and may change soon.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #490 on: October 13, 2011, 09:52:46 AM »
How is it a "loophole"?
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #491 on: October 13, 2011, 09:56:27 AM »
It's okay Rooselk, I really didn't think you had a reasonable explanation for that question anyway. I have read P&Y's rules of fair chase and if our seasons are regulated in compliance with their rules, why does Washington allow baiting? Or is this "being ridiculous" too?

Just to make it known to those who have not read them, Pope & Young's Rules of Fair Chase don't say anything whatsoever about baiting... ???

And if someone killed a helpless animal and stated as much on their P&Y entry form it would be denied inclusion in that record book.
Are you saying that if someone stated they are baiting it would not be allowed inclusion in the Record Book?
If that is what you are saying it is absolutely not true.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44707
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #492 on: October 13, 2011, 10:15:51 AM »
How is it a "loophole"?

Don't know. That's what I was told. She may have been inserting a judgement or may have been parroting a Dept. attitude about baiting elk and deer. No idea.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #493 on: October 13, 2011, 10:28:51 AM »
How is it a "loophole"?

Don't know. That's what I was told. She may have been inserting a judgement or may have been parroting a Dept. attitude about baiting elk and deer. No idea.

I think that is the most likely scenario. I called about it 10 years ago and the individual I spoke to had a similar opinion/attitude. I am sure they will eventually do away with it. It seems they put it up for public input every year so someone is pushing hard to take it away.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #494 on: October 13, 2011, 11:07:02 AM »
Baiting has nothing to do with Lumenoks. I can't believe some person who couldn't recover their deer is using their story to promote the Lumenok. We don't need the electronics and the game department chuckled when it was brought up at the last meeting. I had to mention how I was against them. Archers should focus on the ball - more seasons and opportunities for permits as opposed to gadgets.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bow mount trolling motors by Stein
[Today at 09:05:06 AM]


Oregon results posted. by trophyhunt
[Today at 08:51:12 AM]


best draw for moose unit wise by hunter399
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by trophyelk6x6
[Today at 08:24:13 AM]


2025 OILS! by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:40:49 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by lhrbull
[Today at 06:59:24 AM]


Nooksack Archery Tag by LongBomb
[Today at 06:29:37 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by Turner89
[Yesterday at 11:33:35 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 09:54:06 PM]


Basin elk by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 09:50:49 PM]


Getting back into dogs by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 09:06:14 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Nwgunner
[Yesterday at 08:55:00 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 08:50:46 PM]


Is FS70 open? by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 08:09:04 PM]


Muzzy Mission Quality!!! by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:49:11 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Smittyk44
[Yesterday at 04:23:53 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 04:11:52 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by BULLBLASTER
[Yesterday at 03:53:35 PM]


Mature bulls during late season? by Pete112288
[Yesterday at 03:51:08 PM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by Hi-Liter
[Yesterday at 03:23:47 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal