collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 121,117 pressure  (Read 8300 times)

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9617
  • Location: Spokane
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2011, 07:50:06 PM »
I think it will even out overall..u will get alot of meat hunters who wont hunt..but trophy hunters may specifically target the units in the years to come

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2011, 07:17:47 AM »
I have talked with Dana Base the game biologist for 121. He is VERY much against the 4 point restriction. So is Jim Nelson the head of deer management in the Olympia office. There is NO scientific base for changing to a 4 point restriction. The biologists agree it will do nothing to improve the state of the deer herd in our area. Ask a farmer, if he wants to increase his herd he does not kill or sell his cows. Letting the bull grow older does nothing to increase his herd. It was a political decision by the commissioners to ignore the biologists. There is one particular commissioner that is a trophy hunter and has pushed for this for all his term. The only thing this has done is to restrict the hunting opportunities for youth, disabled, and senior hunters in these units. Hunting rights are for all hunters, not just trophy hunters. Trophy hunting  is a personal choice, NOT a management tool. If it really helped bring back the deer population, I would be all for it. It does not. I personally do not shoot small bucks but I do not try to force my ideals on everyone else. This used to be an area someone could bring their kids and have a fairly good chance of success. We need our youth to carry on our hunting tradition. I  think the hunter numbers will be down as well as the success. Remember we are ALL in this together. I live in the heart of 121 and know of the process that got this regulation in place. We will not be silent at any more commissioners meetings! :twocents:
:yeah:

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2011, 08:13:53 AM »
Some really good points being made and some things to dwell on.  I believe it works for muledeer(three point), always have been a proponent of it.  Not really seeing the need for it for whitetail.  I kinda think its dumb.  Certainly good to hear what others are thinking.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2011, 08:42:55 AM »
I have talked with Dana Base the game biologist for 121. He is VERY much against the 4 point restriction. So is Jim Nelson the head of deer management in the Olympia office. There is NO scientific base for changing to a 4 point restriction. The biologists agree it will do nothing to improve the state of the deer herd in our area. Ask a farmer, if he wants to increase his herd he does not kill or sell his cows. Letting the bull grow older does nothing to increase his herd. It was a political decision by the commissioners to ignore the biologists. There is one particular commissioner that is a trophy hunter and has pushed for this for all his term. The only thing this has done is to restrict the hunting opportunities for youth, disabled, and senior hunters in these units. Hunting rights are for all hunters, not just trophy hunters. Trophy hunting  is a personal choice, NOT a management tool. If it really helped bring back the deer population, I would be all for it. It does not. I personally do not shoot small bucks but I do not try to force my ideals on everyone else. This used to be an area someone could bring their kids and have a fairly good chance of success. We need our youth to carry on our hunting tradition. I  think the hunter numbers will be down as well as the success. Remember we are ALL in this together. I live in the heart of 121 and know of the process that got this regulation in place. We will not be silent at any more commissioners meetings! :twocents:
I can agree with you on not pushing our ideals on everyone else. But unlike our biologist who are not whitetail experts most whitetail specific biologist would disagree with them. Albeit a point restriction is not the best way to get there...it is better than nothing and probably the easiest thing to implement en masse.

You are making the common misconception that QDM is trophy management and that is not the case. The added benefit of QDM is often more trophies simply because most herds are out of whack when it comes to buck/doe ratios and age structure but that is not the specific purpose.

The restricted doe harvest will increase the population. The point restriction will help bring/keep the buck/doe ratio in balance.

Has Dana Base or Jim Nelson published any research on whitetail management? I checked a scholarly database and found nothing to note that they are whitetail management experts or that would show they have any foundation to say QDM (which is made up of some of the best minds in whitetail management) has no scientific basis.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2011, 08:48:46 AM by DBHAWTHORNE »
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline Jburke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1387
  • Location: Spokane
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2011, 10:31:02 AM »
the 4 pt rule is actually going to do just the opposite of creating a trophy area;  its going to be detrimental to the trophy quality of these units;  these units receive tremendous amounts of hunting pressure;  now that you cannot shoot anything less then 4 pts,  ALL of this hunting pressure is now going to be focused on the mature bucks; 

A two week rut hunt with all the hunters focused on 4 pt or better bucks????   hmmm..........anybody have a guess what age class of bucks is going to get hammered??????

we can all check back here in a year when the data comes out, but, my guess is that the harvest of 5 pt or better bucks out of these units at least DOUBLES this year;

the real problem will come in the 2013 hunting season when the full effect of two years of rut hunts with all the hunters focused on the older bucks. 

sure, overall deer harvest will be down tremendously, but, you are going to essentially wipe out the older bucks populations in the next two years; 

there won't be any more recruitment of bucks into the 4.5 yr old age class then there was before the 4 pt rule;  but, in the next two years there will be permanent damage down to the older age classes.

The average public got sold a bill of goods on this.......the population of older age class bucks on public ground will get hammered with the amount of hunting pressure this unit receives along with the two week rut hunt. 

The people that pushed this are private land owners and outfitters;  they will not see these devastating effects because the hunting pressure is highly regulated on these lands.

Not only will this rule not help the deer herds, it will hurt them because you are protecting the youngest age class instead of the older age classes;  over a few years the dominant age class will become 1.5 yr old bucks;  they will then do the majority of the breeding;  mother nature sets it up for older age class bucks to do the breeding for a reason......lots of data to show that does bred by older bucks have more fit fawns;  so, now we are going to have the equivalent of a bunch of 12 yr old boys doing the breeding.

The first casualty of the 4 pt rule will be the dramatic shortening or elimination of the two week rut hunt by 2013 as it becomes obvious the mature bucks are getting hammered.
While I'm not a fan of the 4 pt min, I disagree with your guess on the harvest of older bucks 100%.  I think you are dead wrong there.  It may go up a little but I don't think it will even come close to doubling.  I don't even think the average hunter even sees a 5 pt or better buck each year, let alone has any kind of shot opportunity.  Most hunter's don't go far from roads still, and I can count the number of 5 pt or better bucks on one hand that I've seen from a road.  It's not nearly as easy to find a 5 pt as it is to shoot a spike crossing the road in front of you.  Most people just simply don't put in enough effort to trophy hunt.   :twocents:

Offline cem3434

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+31)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 3182
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: NRA, MDF, RMEF, NWTF, PF, RGS, WSF, WSTA
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2011, 11:17:36 AM »
the 4 pt rule is actually going to do just the opposite of creating a trophy area;  its going to be detrimental to the trophy quality of these units;  these units receive tremendous amounts of hunting pressure;  now that you cannot shoot anything less then 4 pts,  ALL of this hunting pressure is now going to be focused on the mature bucks; 

A two week rut hunt with all the hunters focused on 4 pt or better bucks????   hmmm..........anybody have a guess what age class of bucks is going to get hammered??????

we can all check back here in a year when the data comes out, but, my guess is that the harvest of 5 pt or better bucks out of these units at least DOUBLES this year;

the real problem will come in the 2013 hunting season when the full effect of two years of rut hunts with all the hunters focused on the older bucks. 

sure, overall deer harvest will be down tremendously, but, you are going to essentially wipe out the older bucks populations in the next two years; 

there won't be any more recruitment of bucks into the 4.5 yr old age class then there was before the 4 pt rule;  but, in the next two years there will be permanent damage down to the older age classes.

The average public got sold a bill of goods on this.......the population of older age class bucks on public ground will get hammered with the amount of hunting pressure this unit receives along with the two week rut hunt. 

The people that pushed this are private land owners and outfitters;  they will not see these devastating effects because the hunting pressure is highly regulated on these lands.

Not only will this rule not help the deer herds, it will hurt them because you are protecting the youngest age class instead of the older age classes;  over a few years the dominant age class will become 1.5 yr old bucks;  they will then do the majority of the breeding;  mother nature sets it up for older age class bucks to do the breeding for a reason......lots of data to show that does bred by older bucks have more fit fawns;  so, now we are going to have the equivalent of a bunch of 12 yr old boys doing the breeding.

The first casualty of the 4 pt rule will be the dramatic shortening or elimination of the two week rut hunt by 2013 as it becomes obvious the mature bucks are getting hammered.
While I'm not a fan of the 4 pt min, I disagree with your guess on the harvest of older bucks 100%.  I think you are dead wrong there.  It may go up a little but I don't think it will even come close to doubling.  I don't even think the average hunter even sees a 5 pt or better buck each year, let alone has any kind of shot opportunity.  Most hunter's don't go far from roads still, and I can count the number of 5 pt or better bucks on one hand that I've seen from a road.  It's not nearly as easy to find a 5 pt as it is to shoot a spike crossing the road in front of you.  Most people just simply don't put in enough effort to trophy hunt.   :twocents:

 :yeah:
My guess is that initially it will go up slightly, but even out over the next couple of years.  Don't think all of the young bucks don't take note of the older bucks getting taken out.  Eventually, the young dumb bucks become the smart old bucks and learn to be nocturnal in order to survive.

I think this is a good move and will benefit the herd, not hinder it like some of you have suggested. 
The best friend a guy could have asked for. RIP chasing pheasants in heaven Denali girl.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #21 on: July 10, 2011, 11:49:45 AM »
Quote
Most people just simply don't put in enough effort to trophy hunt.

 :yeah:

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9617
  • Location: Spokane
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #22 on: July 10, 2011, 12:37:32 PM »
Couldn't agree more...Lazy ...the opposition is from people who shoot the first thing they see from the road

Offline colockumelk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4910
  • Location: Watertown, NY
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2011, 12:00:42 AM »
@Muleyguy  are your statements based on facts or studies?  Or are they just your opinion?  I  disagree with your statements.  I don't disagree because I pretend to be some sort of whitetail guru or expert.  In fact I'm the opposite of an expert.  But....  I currently live back east and I have been reading up on Whitetail QDM.  And back east these people take their Whitetail managment seriously.  Like Alabama vs Auburn seriously.  Unlike in WA where all the wildlife bios are paid by the state,  out East there are private groups who pay bios ALOT of money to figure out the best way to make a healthy deer herd.  And every single study that I have read, heard about or talked to the locals about says that the 4pt minimum will work.  Everything I've seen proves your statements wrong.  :twocents:

The only proof I can give is this.  About 5 years ago most of the state of Alabama went to a QDM type of season.  You are allowed to harvest 3 bucks.  2 of them must be 3pt min and 1 of them must be 4pt min.  From talking to the locals and the local game wardens the quality of hunting and number of bucks has skyrocketed. 

@buckcanyonlodge I agree with DBHAWTHORNE as well.  Most of the whitetail experts are from the mid-west and the south.  And they all disagree with the two people you listed.  I also looked and didn't see that they had done any studies on the matter.   :twocents:

Again I'm not an expert but I've read some stuff by experts and talked to experts that say QDM works.  I've also seen the effects of QDM.  If people don't like the change they can hunt somewhere else.  I don't like spike only for elk.  Which is why as soon as I draw a tag I'm gonna hunt elk on the west side.  I didn't like hunting with other people so now I hunt in the wilderness.  Moving to a new area is not a bigt deal.  The nice thing about WA is they have so many different types and places to hunt.  They almost have a type of hunting for everyone.  If you don't like how one place is because it doesn't fit yoru style of hunting.  Its simple go to a place that fits yourstyle.  Do you want trophy or any deer.  Do you want lots of roads or a wilderness area.  Sage brush or the jungle.  Bow, ML, Rifle, late or early season.  Roosevelt, Rocky Mountain, Blacktail, Muley, Whitetail etc.  So many different types of hunting.  I don't think making two GMU's a QDM unit is a big deal.   :twocents:
« Last Edit: July 11, 2011, 12:32:45 AM by colockumelk »
"We Sleep Safe In Our Beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those that would do us harm."
Author: George Orwell

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2011, 06:09:04 AM »
The pisser is this. The locals who live and have hunted there for generations now have to put up w/hunting 4 point. I know a lot of families who hunt for the meat, including myself when I live there with my 5 kids. O, I guess if they don't like it, they can spend lots on gas and not hunt there own land.

Offline cem3434

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+31)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 3182
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: NRA, MDF, RMEF, NWTF, PF, RGS, WSF, WSTA
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2011, 07:30:18 AM »
The pisser is this. The locals who live and have hunted there for generations now have to put up w/hunting 4 point. I know a lot of families who hunt for the meat, including myself when I live there with my 5 kids. O, I guess if they don't like it, they can spend lots on gas and not hunt there own land.

I have a couple of friends that live right in the middle of 117. They are excited at the potential of raising the quality deer over the next several years. They too depend on meat, but they have never had a problem shooting mature bucks.

If you are willing to hunt, filling the freezer shouldnt be a problem still.  There is no need for the locals to drive anywhere, rather I would suggest parking the truck and getting in the woods........cause thats where the mature deer are! :tup:
The best friend a guy could have asked for. RIP chasing pheasants in heaven Denali girl.

Offline baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2602
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2011, 07:39:32 AM »
Pa Ben-I think that big game hunting is slowly (not so slowly in some area) evolving into a sport where the monied  trophy hunters are calling the shots. "Quality" hunts in the western states are their answer to the leased/club hunting that is prevalant in the eastern and southern states.  We still have vast expanses of public land that they can't control any other way than to influence game managers to proclaim vast expanses as "quality" areas.  We are already seeing lottery hunts on many species where most of us simply can't afford to participate and it's astounding what some people are able to pay to win these lotteries ( I personally know a hunter who buys into several ram lotteries with 100-200 tickets at $20.00/ticket) Personally, I think qulaity hunts will eventually evolve into lottery type hunts.  there's just to much money to be made. (I know several people invovlved , as an example, with the hunter and guide involved in the "spidey bull" elk hunt in Utah and they estimate that hunt cost the hunter in excess of $500,00)  When you see quality elk hunts going for $25,000 and deer hunts for $10,000 or more, it's easy to understand why there are people who want more quality animals made available. Is it sound game management?-bioligists I know (mostly in Utah which is refining the art of "quality hunts)-seems to be split on their opinions, but all agree that bigger animals "sale" for a lot more. there are many hunters out there who really don't want more "meat" hunters out there, they could care less that hunting used to be one of the sports where the "common" guy could get out with his family and enjoy the outdoors and maybe put a steak or two in the freezer.  they want that big rack on the wall and talk about how many points it scored and could care less about how many lbs. it put in the freezer. Just my opinion, of course, but I'm not sure I like the direction I see big game hunting going.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #27 on: July 13, 2011, 06:09:50 AM »
One thing I see is a lot of kids will miss out on there first deer because of this law.

Offline doyourtime89

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 1215
  • Location: Federal way, Wa
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #28 on: July 13, 2011, 10:15:43 AM »
   That is kind of where I am at with this.  The kids...I have hunted and taken my fair share of animals.  But my son started hunting a few years ago, he had taken a couple deer.  We live on the west side and over the past couple years have been driving over putting in time and effort trying to get to know that area because we have been told a lot better chance over there and that is what I want for my son and now this year my wife will hunt for her first year.  But this new rule has me looking else where now.  I am not sure if its time to start all over or what.  I really do like that area, but I still haven't learned it enough to be really confident yet.  That does take a few years.

Offline Jburke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1387
  • Location: Spokane
Re: 121,117 pressure
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2011, 12:36:43 PM »
   That is kind of where I am at with this.  The kids...I have hunted and taken my fair share of animals.  But my son started hunting a few years ago, he had taken a couple deer.  We live on the west side and over the past couple years have been driving over putting in time and effort trying to get to know that area because we have been told a lot better chance over there and that is what I want for my son and now this year my wife will hunt for her first year.  But this new rule has me looking else where now.  I am not sure if its time to start all over or what.  I really do like that area, but I still haven't learned it enough to be really confident yet.  That does take a few years.
It really does take time.  Iv'e been hunting those areas for 6 years or so and am still not confident that I can go out and shoot mature deer consistently.  Sure I have found good areas and seen some nice deer.  But not with enough consistency to be confident yet.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 10:14:22 PM]


Wyoming Antelope Unit 80 by jamesfromseattle
[Today at 09:57:30 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 09:56:54 PM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by Falcon
[Today at 09:50:55 PM]


My Brothers First Blacktail by TitusFord
[Today at 09:08:28 PM]


Pack mules/llamas by Shooter4
[Today at 07:59:16 PM]


Kinda fun LH rimfire rifle project by JDHasty
[Today at 07:01:44 PM]


Non-Shoulder mount elk ideas by Pete112288
[Today at 06:45:10 PM]


SE raffle tags holder by redi
[Today at 06:09:09 PM]


Dang bears... by Lumpy Taters
[Today at 05:16:31 PM]


May/June Trail Cam: Roosevelt Bull Elk & Blacktail Bucks with Promising Growth by Lumpy Taters
[Today at 05:13:15 PM]


Little Natchez cow elk by royalbull
[Today at 03:39:11 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Today at 02:14:44 PM]


Mason County Youth Buck Nov 1-16 by ASHQUACK
[Today at 12:02:20 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by 92xj
[Today at 10:55:13 AM]


Turkey hunt with Hunting for vets. by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:43:15 AM]


gmu 636 elk hunt by eastfork
[Today at 09:38:34 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by Sunbkpk
[Today at 09:35:56 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by mboyle0828
[Today at 09:22:04 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal