collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: High Altitude Ballistics  (Read 4045 times)

Offline BC CHASER

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 1393
  • Location: Sh!thole WA state
  • Si vis pacem para bellum
High Altitude Ballistics
« on: July 06, 2008, 02:46:53 PM »
How many of you have had a change in the travel of your bullets from your sight in spot to the high country?  I sight in at about 300 ft. and will be hunting at 7-8000 this year I believe it will change but how much?
WA.MT.UT.AZ.KS.NM.CO.AK.NZ.
Lion Pride founding member

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6065
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2008, 03:50:54 PM »
It will change some but not enough to be concerned unless your shooting longer ranges.
 As an example my .300WM, shooting at 500 yds., has 40" of drop at sea level and 37" of drop at 8000ft. above sea level.

Offline BC CHASER

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 1393
  • Location: Sh!thole WA state
  • Si vis pacem para bellum
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2008, 05:05:25 PM »
Thanks
WA.MT.UT.AZ.KS.NM.CO.AK.NZ.
Lion Pride founding member

Offline JoshT

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 738
  • Location: Sweeping the leg!
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2008, 01:47:40 PM »
If you're using turrets a good rule of thumb is about - 1/4 MOA per 2500' in elevation gain...

Example: If my correction for a 600 yard shot is +10 MOA at sea-level... then the correction at 5000' (where  most of my shots on bears occur) is +9.5 MOA.

If you're using a ballistic type reticule... then you probably won't notice much of a difference out to about any sane range. The only way to know is to climb up there and shoot a few rocks... empherical evidence trumps theoretical ballistic gak... contrary to the popular internet belief.
Strike Hard...
Strike Fast...
No Mercy, SIR!

Offline Intruder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Spo-Vegas
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2008, 02:52:08 PM »
It will change some but not enough to be concerned unless your shooting longer ranges.

+1....
Kinda depends on your cal/load too.  But more than likely it isn't a major factor of concern.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Searing prime rib by Fastass350
[Today at 10:23:37 AM]


5 Golden Rings! by Dan-o
[Today at 10:11:22 AM]


Learning his ducks by greenhead_killer
[Today at 10:09:16 AM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by Machias
[Today at 09:56:35 AM]


Your Idea of the perfect bull elk by crabcreekhunter
[Today at 09:48:12 AM]


Cell Cams for Westside Elk by kodiak06
[Today at 06:01:59 AM]


Perfect 4 by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 10:19:32 PM]


Pack/ backpack to carry a folding long and edc etc.? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:58:37 PM]


How to get big game rules changed? by furbearer365
[Yesterday at 08:35:51 PM]


Darwood Outfitters by bobcat
[Yesterday at 07:25:18 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 02:52:12 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by Ricochet
[Yesterday at 02:48:52 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 12:23:43 PM]


In the background by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 11:59:27 AM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 11:42:03 AM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 10:39:25 AM]


TEN TIPS FOR GREAT FIELD PHOTOS - A strategy for taking quality success photos by KNOPHISH
[Yesterday at 09:00:54 AM]


Tease 'l' by Ricochet
[Yesterday at 08:14:25 AM]


35 whelen by tgray
[Yesterday at 08:13:08 AM]


“Recreational trappers”? by GWP
[Yesterday at 07:36:53 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal