Free: Contests & Raffles.
Your not going to eliminate morons from bow hunting with a class. Look at all the morons that are modern hunting evry year. They all had to take hunt ed classes. I HATE the thought of another class, Reg, law, whatever!
I taught the bow hunter class. It was fun and the students (mostly new bow hunters) got a lot out of it. I would not want to see it go mandatory. It would ruin the class with a lot of people that did not want to be there. Keep it an option.
One thing that is sorely needed is someway to counter with reason and realism all the crap shown on hunting TV and in hunting videos. If inexperienced people take a class from experienced hunters there are tangibles that stand to be gained during the process.
I am both new to the forum and in fact to bowhunting, so take my ramblings with a grain of salt, but here it goes. I certainly understand the resistance by those who do not want to see more regulation, law, control, etc. I tend to view those as cost though with very worthwhile (in my estimation) benefits. The biggest of which is increasing the quality of the hunting experience for those of us that are serious about bowhunting. Making it more difficult to be allowed to bowhunt means less bow hunters, means less pressure, means better harvest. If bowhunting regs like a mandatory class means lower harvest numbers doesn't that also mean more favorable bowhunting season parameters in the long run? I would love to see fewer archery harvests result in say... any elk in GMU 335 for bowhunters.... maybe just dreaming, I know, but I can see a benefit in weeding out the "just because" group. Let those guys hunt with a rifle after we've had a go, right?
It might if the regulations were made and the seasons were set only according to harvest numbers and data, but they aren't. Many of the decisions of our DFW are arbitrary. Take for example the weapons restriction added to the cougar season during archery deer/elk or ML. It was changed because a few bowhunters complained about rifle shots during their archery season. The fact that the bear season/weapon restrictions weren't changed for the same reason relates to the fact that there are more bear hunters than cougar hunters and the resistance from bear hunters would've been too much.So where did you hear that the weapon restriction the WDFW came up with was because of bowhunters? I have talked straight to the WDFW wildlife managers in regards to this, and that was not why they said they did it... hmmmm think about it... in the woods with a gun during elk archery season....