collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: pixels?????  (Read 1679 times)

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
pixels?????
« on: March 08, 2012, 01:45:17 PM »
I'm looking at getting a Nikon D50 that is only 6.1 Megapixels. Is that good? I see cameras with 12 and even more.
I'm very nieve but what is the diff? Quality?
Don't go with the lower?
Thanks

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2012, 01:51:32 PM »
More pixels allow you to crop your images down and not lose as much quality. If you are looking at poster size images for your wall you are going to want a higher pixel count. If you never go bigger than 12x8 you will be fine with the 6.1.

That being said, there are loads of pre owned cameras out there for relatively little money, not sure why you would settle on a 6 mp camera when you can find 8mp cameras for $200
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2012, 01:54:24 PM »
Gramps is going to have a nice camera up for sale soon, maybe you should send him a PM ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2012, 01:56:00 PM »
Here is what I'm looking at getting for $300
Is it a good deal or wait?

Nikon D50 camera
Nikon 70-300
Nikon 18-55


description from amazon.com


6.1-megapixel sensor captures enough detail for photo-quality 14 x 19-inch prints
Compatible with AF and DX Nikkor lenses; kit includes 18-55mm f3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX Zoom Nikkor lens
Continuous shooting at 2.5 frames per second for bursts of up to 137 pictures
2.0-inch LCD display; 7 scene modes, including new Child mode
Stores images on SD cards; powered by Lithium-ion battery (battery and Quick Charger supplied)
Stores images on SD cards , powered by Lithium-ion battery (battery and Quick Charger supplied)
2.0-inch LCD display , 7 scene modes, including new Child mode
Compatible with AF and DX Nikkor lenses , kit includes 18-55mm f3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX Zoom Nikkor lens
Technical Details
Brand Name: Nikon
Model: 541535258
Optical Sensor Resolution: 6.1 MP
Optical Sensor Technology: CCD
Optical zoom: 3 x
Lens Type: zoom
Display Size: 2 inches
Image types: JPEG
Shooting Modes: Landscape, Portrait mode, Close-up, Night portrait, Children, Sports mode
Exposure Control Type: Landscape, Portrait mode, Close-up
Viewfinder Type: Optical

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32940
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2012, 02:03:50 PM »
It shoots 3008x2000 RAW so you will have some flexibility in post processing but it does not shoot RAW+JPG, better plan picking up a decent post processing software too. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2012, 04:38:11 PM »
It shoots 3008x2000 RAW so you will have some flexibility in post processing but it does not shoot RAW+JPG, better plan picking up a decent post processing software too. :twocents:

I really don't know what that means, explain? :dunno:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21842
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2012, 04:41:48 PM »
It shoots 3008x2000 RAW so you will have some flexibility in post processing but it does not shoot RAW+JPG, better plan picking up a decent post processing software too. :twocents:

I really don't know what that means, explain? :dunno:
http://www.all-things-photography.com/raw-or-jpeg.html
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2012, 04:45:07 PM »
Thanks :hello:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21842
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2012, 04:49:06 PM »
Six megapixels is on the low end by current standards, but it is not the only factor that determines picture quality.  A 6 MP Nikon DSLR will outshoot virtually every compact 10 to 14 MP camera because of the larger sensor size. Pixels sell, but sensor size is more important.  The nice thing about cameras with interchangeable lenses is that you can purchase a newer camera body at some point, and continue to use the lenses you have.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8880
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: pixels?????
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2012, 04:55:54 PM »
Six megapixels is on the low end by current standards, but it is not the only factor that determines picture quality.  A 6 MP Nikon DSLR will outshoot virtually every compact 10 to 14 MP camera because of the larger sensor size. Pixels sell, but sensor size is more important.

 :yeah:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

My Wenaha bull by highside74
[Today at 12:29:54 AM]


"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 11:00:32 PM]


New Hunter by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:53:51 PM]


Abandoned salmon nets on the Columbia River by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:51:08 PM]


How is late season whitetail hunting? Good, bad, decent? GMU 105/117? by BrockWeilep
[Yesterday at 09:43:45 PM]


Any word on closers in Hancock Timberland x inc. unit 121 by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:00:53 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by ganghis
[Yesterday at 08:56:04 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:17:09 PM]


Stevens double barrel 410 by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:39:01 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by blackdog
[Yesterday at 06:57:48 PM]


Durable scope advice by Ac04
[Yesterday at 06:55:22 PM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by blackpowderhunter
[Yesterday at 06:49:19 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 06:41:06 PM]


Taneum Elk Cow tag problem by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 06:37:41 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:19:46 PM]


Throwing a Hail Marry - Late Season Deer or Elk by Remnar
[Yesterday at 06:18:39 PM]


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:33:03 PM]


Upland bird carry options by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:23:10 PM]


Camping Spot by Cwyatt4826
[Yesterday at 05:06:18 PM]


Swakane Deer by String Bender
[Yesterday at 04:25:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal