Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: NWWABOWHNTR on April 18, 2012, 06:49:47 AMChase 1.... please re-read this in regards to the flawed survey.... hunters opinions? Over 1000 letters, emails against lighted nocks and electronics were submitted to the Commission in regards to this by bowhunters that felt strongly enough to do so. Were any of you that are upset at the Commission meeting in Moses Lake? I didn't see one person testify on Saturday "FOR" it...That was one of several ways to address the issue with the Commission, so that argument holds little water. The WDFW response to your comment was..."While the survey was not random, it is ourbelief that a significant majority of archerssupport illuminated nocks. Our belief is largelybased on our experience and the large numberof respondents (3000+)."So your saying that all the sportsman that couldn't take a day off work should not have a say on the matter? C' on Man.
Chase 1.... please re-read this in regards to the flawed survey.... hunters opinions? Over 1000 letters, emails against lighted nocks and electronics were submitted to the Commission in regards to this by bowhunters that felt strongly enough to do so. Were any of you that are upset at the Commission meeting in Moses Lake? I didn't see one person testify on Saturday "FOR" it...
Man, I don't know about this chemically lighted nock. That would open up Pandora's box! Pretty soon people will be using chemicals on the other end of their arrow so they can kill an animal just by grazing it. Imagine all the un-ethical hunting practices this will cause!!!!
Can someone explain to me what the big deal is anyway?......
It's a big deal because some people who wanted them didn't get their way. I spoke in favor of them and don't care. There are way bigger fish to fry and ones that we can all get together on, like more OTC tags and increased opportunities for everyone. Nocks? very minute in the larger picture.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on April 19, 2012, 10:57:39 AMIt's a big deal because some people who wanted them didn't get their way. I spoke in favor of them and don't care. There are way bigger fish to fry and ones that we can all get together on, like more OTC tags and increased opportunities for everyone. Nocks? very minute in the larger picture.In a nutshell, I agree. I have voiced support of this issue from the get go. What I haven't divulged is that I have never, nor do I plan to, use lite nocks when they are made legal. I have kept an open mind to the concerns of my fellow archers and have been willing to consider factors that I may not have considered. Unfortunately for the loud >15% minority, I am still part of the vast majority. The arguments in opposition have been flimsy at best. I respect the opinions of the few, but at the end of the day they are just that, an extreme minority opinion.As for it being a petty and distracting issue, it's absolutely true. I try to be as active on as many issues as I can find time for, this one just happen to be in our face this go round. I really wish that it had been passed this year so we could move on to the issues that really need attention.
how many times has a warden checked your nocks? people who wanna use them wilthe decision makes 0 sense and its right along the lines of not allowing inline muzzys if anything the inlines are far more advantagous then allowing a stupid lighted nock that does s&^%$ to aid in harvest..