collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Methow Wolves  (Read 7602 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Methow Wolves
« on: May 23, 2012, 03:43:34 PM »
To much is being made of this kind of thing, the state will simply write the guy a check so whats the big deal, everyone wins right?


Quote
WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

May 23, 2012
Contact: Steve Pozzanghera, (509) 892-7852

Wildlife managers treat dead calf
as 'probable' case of wolf predation

OLYMPIA - State and federal wildlife managers have determined that wolves likely caused injuries that resulted in the death of a calf on a Methow Valley ranch May 18 and that the landowner would qualify for compensation.

The landowner would be the first in the state to qualify for compensation under criteria established by the state's Wolf Conservation and Management Plan adopted late last year.

Steve Pozzanghera, a regional director for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, said it was not possible to say for certain that wolves caused the injuries that resulted in the death of the calf, although evidence at the scene supports that conclusion.

"The calf was mostly consumed by the time the department was called in," Pozzanghera said. "But photos of the carcass taken earlier by the rancher as well as tracks located in the area were definitely consistent with wolves."

Pozzanghera also noted that the 3,000-acre ranch near Carlton is in an area traditionally used by the Lookout wolf pack, and that remote, motion-triggered cameras had photographed two wolves on nearby National Forest land in recent weeks. 

The Lookout pack is one of five wolf packs confirmed by WDFW in the state.  The department is currently working to confirm other wolf packs.

Officials from WDFW met May 22 with those from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the USDA's Wildlife Services Program to examine the evidence and develop a response to the loss of the calf. All three agencies are involved, because wolves in the western two-thirds of the state are protected as an endangered species under both state and federal law.

The primary goal of the state's new wolf management plan is to protect gray wolves as they reestablish themselves in Washington, but it also includes provisions to compensate ranchers who lose livestock to wolf predation, Pozzanghera said.

Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres.

In all cases, Pozzanghera urges ranchers who believe they have lost livestock to predation to contact WDFW immediately at 1-877- 933-9847.

"The sooner we can investigate the situation, the better our chances are of determining whether the incident is a wolf kill and whether compensation is warranted," he said. "We also ask that landowners protect the site from disturbances and keep scavengers away by covering the carcass with a tarp."

WDFW currently has $80,000 available to help livestock operators prevent conflicts with wolves and compensate ranchers who lose livestock to predation by wolves. Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature, $15,000 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and $15,000 from the non-profit organization Defenders of Wildlife. 
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline loper

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 31
  • Location: Salem
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2012, 03:48:17 PM »
Thanks for posting that; I was about to do the same and then saw this thread.  :)

I didn't know that the Washington plan allowed for compensation payments for a "probable" depredation; that is actually a positive.

The first of many I'm sure.  :(

Offline Chase 1

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Snohomish County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2012, 04:15:38 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"? 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2012, 04:23:50 PM »
Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?

I would imagine that that would be the case.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2012, 04:29:37 PM »
"Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature".................I wonder where the money comes from that the Legistature was so nice and provided to them?   :dunno:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2012, 04:32:02 PM »
"Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature".................I wonder where the money comes from that the Legistature was so nice and provided to them?   :dunno:

Wouldn't surprise me to find out it came from our fishing/hunting license fees.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2012, 04:33:25 PM »
That is what I'm afraid of.  :(
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25034
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2012, 05:23:51 PM »
This article points out some interesting things that most people gloss over.
Quote
WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

May 23, 2012
Contact: Steve Pozzanghera, (509) 892-7852

Wildlife managers treat dead calf
as 'probable' case of wolf predation

OLYMPIA - State and federal wildlife managers have determined that wolves likely caused injuries that resulted in the death of a calf on a Methow Valley ranch May 18 and that the landowner would qualify for compensation.

The landowner would be the first in the state to qualify for compensation under criteria established by the state's Wolf Conservation and Management Plan adopted late last year.

Steve Pozzanghera, a regional director for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, said it was not possible to say for certain that wolves caused the injuries that resulted in the death of the calf, although evidence at the scene supports that conclusion.

"The calf was mostly consumed by the time the department was called in," Pozzanghera said. "But photos of the carcass taken earlier by the rancher as well as tracks located in the area were definitely consistent with wolves."

Pozzanghera also noted that the 3,000-acre ranch near Carlton is in an area traditionally used by the Lookout wolf pack, and that remote, motion-triggered cameras had photographed two wolves on nearby National Forest land in recent weeks. 

The Lookout pack is one of five wolf packs confirmed by WDFW in the state.  The department is currently working to confirm other wolf packs.

Officials from WDFW met May 22 with those from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the USDA's Wildlife Services Program to examine the evidence and develop a response to the loss of the calf. All three agencies are involved, because wolves in the western two-thirds of the state are protected as an endangered species under both state and federal law.

This is interesting because in this article the WDFW recognises that they are NOT protected in the  eastern 1/3 of the state, yet the state protects them there anyway!   :bash:

The primary goal of the state's new wolf management plan is to protect gray wolves as they reestablish themselves in Washington, but it also includes provisions to compensate ranchers who lose livestock to wolf predation, Pozzanghera said.

Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres.

What does it take have "confermed" loss? what is the dividing line? I wish we could find some examples of the line drawn in the sand? if you cannot say with enough certanty that this was a wolf kill, I think you need to have your eyes and or logic examined

In all cases, Pozzanghera urges ranchers who believe they have lost livestock to predation to contact WDFW immediately at 1-877- 933-9847.

"The sooner we can investigate the situation, the better our chances are of determining whether the incident is a wolf kill and whether compensation is warranted," he said. "We also ask that landowners protect the site from disturbances and keep scavengers away by covering the carcass with a tarp."

WDFW currently has $80,000 available to help livestock operators prevent conflicts with wolves and compensate ranchers who lose livestock to predation by wolves. Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature, $15,000 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and $15,000 from the non-profit organization Defenders of Wildlife. 
[/quote]

I too wonder where that 50K comes from...
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Online Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9100
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2012, 09:12:51 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?

I served on the committee that the WDFW used to help write the current policy on payments for damages caused by wildlife. Wolves were not included in it but basically when the money runs out everyone that makes a claim after the moneys gone gets nothing. The next fiscal year it starts over.
I would imagine it would be the same with wolf predation of livestock. They would probably confirm a kill if it was wolf but what's the point if there's no money in the bank.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2012, 09:25:10 PM »
I served on the committee that the WDFW used to help write the current policy on payments for damages caused by wildlife. Wolves were not included in it but basically when the money runs out everyone that makes a claim after the moneys gone gets nothing. The next fiscal year it starts over.
I would imagine it would be the same with wolf predation of livestock. They would probably confirm a kill if it was wolf but what's the point if there's no money in the bank.

 :yike:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline sled

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3559
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2012, 09:32:45 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?
  yeah..  they will raise the license prices again

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2012, 09:37:30 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?
  yeah..  they will raise the license prices again

LOL, sadly there is likely more truth to that than we think. :chuckle:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline villageidiot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 430
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2012, 09:46:30 PM »
The cattle rancher said, which was not in the news article that when he found the calf it was still alive and he had to shoot it.  It's peculiar that the article said it was mostly consumed so was hard to determine.  The rancher also said he saw two wolves, one big and one small and he shot at them and told WDFW he would shoot to kill if they returned.  He also said he found two other calves that he took back home and doctored that had been chewed on.  He returned them back to the pasture after doctoring.  This rancher is also a licensed veterinarian so should be perfectly qualified to identify a canine attack.   It's interesting how an article can "milk toast" a tragic event.

Offline canyelk48

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 612
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2012, 07:47:11 AM »
"Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres."

Who dreamed up this stupid "rule"?  So the smaller ranchers' livestock isn't considered as valuable as the ranchers who have large acreages? 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2012, 07:52:59 AM »
"Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres."

Who dreamed up this stupid "rule"?  So the smaller ranchers' livestock isn't considered as valuable as the ranchers who have large acreages?

Democrats ?
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by JDHasty
[Today at 10:47:34 PM]


Boat registration by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:22:29 PM]


Bear behavior by jamesjett
[Today at 09:44:15 PM]


Norway Pass Archery Elk 2025 by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:14:45 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 09:05:06 PM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by JDArms1240
[Today at 09:03:40 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by dr.derek
[Today at 08:29:53 PM]


Pearygin Quality by MADMAX
[Today at 07:55:09 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Caveman123
[Today at 07:43:44 PM]


Oregon results posted. by Caveman123
[Today at 07:40:47 PM]


2025 Draw Results by Yeti419
[Today at 07:27:32 PM]


Mudflow Archery by Yeti419
[Today at 07:26:25 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by dilleytech
[Today at 07:14:35 PM]


Rehome for GWP by Feathernfurr
[Today at 06:43:07 PM]


Vashon Island deer tag by bowhunter_1
[Today at 04:32:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal