collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Methow Wolves  (Read 7618 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Methow Wolves
« on: May 23, 2012, 03:43:34 PM »
To much is being made of this kind of thing, the state will simply write the guy a check so whats the big deal, everyone wins right?


Quote
WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

May 23, 2012
Contact: Steve Pozzanghera, (509) 892-7852

Wildlife managers treat dead calf
as 'probable' case of wolf predation

OLYMPIA - State and federal wildlife managers have determined that wolves likely caused injuries that resulted in the death of a calf on a Methow Valley ranch May 18 and that the landowner would qualify for compensation.

The landowner would be the first in the state to qualify for compensation under criteria established by the state's Wolf Conservation and Management Plan adopted late last year.

Steve Pozzanghera, a regional director for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, said it was not possible to say for certain that wolves caused the injuries that resulted in the death of the calf, although evidence at the scene supports that conclusion.

"The calf was mostly consumed by the time the department was called in," Pozzanghera said. "But photos of the carcass taken earlier by the rancher as well as tracks located in the area were definitely consistent with wolves."

Pozzanghera also noted that the 3,000-acre ranch near Carlton is in an area traditionally used by the Lookout wolf pack, and that remote, motion-triggered cameras had photographed two wolves on nearby National Forest land in recent weeks. 

The Lookout pack is one of five wolf packs confirmed by WDFW in the state.  The department is currently working to confirm other wolf packs.

Officials from WDFW met May 22 with those from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the USDA's Wildlife Services Program to examine the evidence and develop a response to the loss of the calf. All three agencies are involved, because wolves in the western two-thirds of the state are protected as an endangered species under both state and federal law.

The primary goal of the state's new wolf management plan is to protect gray wolves as they reestablish themselves in Washington, but it also includes provisions to compensate ranchers who lose livestock to wolf predation, Pozzanghera said.

Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres.

In all cases, Pozzanghera urges ranchers who believe they have lost livestock to predation to contact WDFW immediately at 1-877- 933-9847.

"The sooner we can investigate the situation, the better our chances are of determining whether the incident is a wolf kill and whether compensation is warranted," he said. "We also ask that landowners protect the site from disturbances and keep scavengers away by covering the carcass with a tarp."

WDFW currently has $80,000 available to help livestock operators prevent conflicts with wolves and compensate ranchers who lose livestock to predation by wolves. Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature, $15,000 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and $15,000 from the non-profit organization Defenders of Wildlife. 
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline loper

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 31
  • Location: Salem
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2012, 03:48:17 PM »
Thanks for posting that; I was about to do the same and then saw this thread.  :)

I didn't know that the Washington plan allowed for compensation payments for a "probable" depredation; that is actually a positive.

The first of many I'm sure.  :(

Offline Chase 1

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Snohomish County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2012, 04:15:38 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"? 

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2012, 04:23:50 PM »
Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?

I would imagine that that would be the case.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2012, 04:29:37 PM »
"Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature".................I wonder where the money comes from that the Legistature was so nice and provided to them?   :dunno:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2012, 04:32:02 PM »
"Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature".................I wonder where the money comes from that the Legistature was so nice and provided to them?   :dunno:

Wouldn't surprise me to find out it came from our fishing/hunting license fees.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2012, 04:33:25 PM »
That is what I'm afraid of.  :(
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25034
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2012, 05:23:51 PM »
This article points out some interesting things that most people gloss over.
Quote
WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

May 23, 2012
Contact: Steve Pozzanghera, (509) 892-7852

Wildlife managers treat dead calf
as 'probable' case of wolf predation

OLYMPIA - State and federal wildlife managers have determined that wolves likely caused injuries that resulted in the death of a calf on a Methow Valley ranch May 18 and that the landowner would qualify for compensation.

The landowner would be the first in the state to qualify for compensation under criteria established by the state's Wolf Conservation and Management Plan adopted late last year.

Steve Pozzanghera, a regional director for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, said it was not possible to say for certain that wolves caused the injuries that resulted in the death of the calf, although evidence at the scene supports that conclusion.

"The calf was mostly consumed by the time the department was called in," Pozzanghera said. "But photos of the carcass taken earlier by the rancher as well as tracks located in the area were definitely consistent with wolves."

Pozzanghera also noted that the 3,000-acre ranch near Carlton is in an area traditionally used by the Lookout wolf pack, and that remote, motion-triggered cameras had photographed two wolves on nearby National Forest land in recent weeks. 

The Lookout pack is one of five wolf packs confirmed by WDFW in the state.  The department is currently working to confirm other wolf packs.

Officials from WDFW met May 22 with those from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the USDA's Wildlife Services Program to examine the evidence and develop a response to the loss of the calf. All three agencies are involved, because wolves in the western two-thirds of the state are protected as an endangered species under both state and federal law.

This is interesting because in this article the WDFW recognises that they are NOT protected in the  eastern 1/3 of the state, yet the state protects them there anyway!   :bash:

The primary goal of the state's new wolf management plan is to protect gray wolves as they reestablish themselves in Washington, but it also includes provisions to compensate ranchers who lose livestock to wolf predation, Pozzanghera said.

Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres.

What does it take have "confermed" loss? what is the dividing line? I wish we could find some examples of the line drawn in the sand? if you cannot say with enough certanty that this was a wolf kill, I think you need to have your eyes and or logic examined

In all cases, Pozzanghera urges ranchers who believe they have lost livestock to predation to contact WDFW immediately at 1-877- 933-9847.

"The sooner we can investigate the situation, the better our chances are of determining whether the incident is a wolf kill and whether compensation is warranted," he said. "We also ask that landowners protect the site from disturbances and keep scavengers away by covering the carcass with a tarp."

WDFW currently has $80,000 available to help livestock operators prevent conflicts with wolves and compensate ranchers who lose livestock to predation by wolves. Of that funding, $50,000 was provided by the state Legislature, $15,000 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and $15,000 from the non-profit organization Defenders of Wildlife. 
[/quote]

I too wonder where that 50K comes from...
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9102
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2012, 09:12:51 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?

I served on the committee that the WDFW used to help write the current policy on payments for damages caused by wildlife. Wolves were not included in it but basically when the money runs out everyone that makes a claim after the moneys gone gets nothing. The next fiscal year it starts over.
I would imagine it would be the same with wolf predation of livestock. They would probably confirm a kill if it was wolf but what's the point if there's no money in the bank.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2012, 09:25:10 PM »
I served on the committee that the WDFW used to help write the current policy on payments for damages caused by wildlife. Wolves were not included in it but basically when the money runs out everyone that makes a claim after the moneys gone gets nothing. The next fiscal year it starts over.
I would imagine it would be the same with wolf predation of livestock. They would probably confirm a kill if it was wolf but what's the point if there's no money in the bank.

 :yike:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline sled

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3559
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2012, 09:32:45 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?
  yeah..  they will raise the license prices again

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2012, 09:37:30 PM »
Anyone know the contingency plan after 40ish, "confirmed" or "probable" wolf kills add up to 80k? Is that an annual allotted amount? How will this system deal with open range cattle kills, too old...too bad? Will they be written off as "can't confirm"?
  yeah..  they will raise the license prices again

LOL, sadly there is likely more truth to that than we think. :chuckle:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline villageidiot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 430
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2012, 09:46:30 PM »
The cattle rancher said, which was not in the news article that when he found the calf it was still alive and he had to shoot it.  It's peculiar that the article said it was mostly consumed so was hard to determine.  The rancher also said he saw two wolves, one big and one small and he shot at them and told WDFW he would shoot to kill if they returned.  He also said he found two other calves that he took back home and doctored that had been chewed on.  He returned them back to the pasture after doctoring.  This rancher is also a licensed veterinarian so should be perfectly qualified to identify a canine attack.   It's interesting how an article can "milk toast" a tragic event.

Offline canyelk48

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 612
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2012, 07:47:11 AM »
"Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres."

Who dreamed up this stupid "rule"?  So the smaller ranchers' livestock isn't considered as valuable as the ranchers who have large acreages? 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2012, 07:52:59 AM »
"Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres."

Who dreamed up this stupid "rule"?  So the smaller ranchers' livestock isn't considered as valuable as the ranchers who have large acreages?

Democrats ?
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2012, 08:00:51 AM »
Provided by the State Legislature my ass......it is taken from us.  Everyone who supported wolf recovery needs to be taxed to pay for the cost of having to deal with this animal......why in hell should we be forced to pay....this state is so assbackward crooked it makes me puke. :twocents:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2012, 09:21:46 AM »
Provided by the State Legislature my ass......it is taken from us.  Everyone who supported wolf recovery needs to be taxed to pay for the cost of having to deal with this animal......why in hell should we be forced to pay....this state is so assbackward crooked it makes me puke. :twocents:

Exactly!  I may not even buy a hunting license this year if I find out hunting license dollars are funding this b.s. wolf sh!t. :bash:  (I already didn't buy any special permit apps because WDFW has pissed me off so much).
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44707
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2012, 09:24:00 AM »
Thanks for posting that; I was about to do the same and then saw this thread.  :)

I didn't know that the Washington plan allowed for compensation payments for a "probable" depredation; that is actually a positive.

The first of many I'm sure.  :(

The problem is that there's not near enough in the budgeted funds to cover estimated depredation and control costs.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Killmore

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 754
  • Location: Ellensburg WA
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2012, 07:42:48 AM »
And the land owner says that the state has been trying to buy her property, what does the state want to do.have a game reserve for the wolves. Whats next,buy a herd of cattle to feed them ,all with OUR money!!

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9102
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2012, 11:50:40 AM »
"Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres."

Who dreamed up this stupid "rule"?  So the smaller ranchers' livestock isn't considered as valuable as the ranchers who have large acreages?

The reason for that is they are trying to stretch the dollars out in the compensation fund. The larger livestock interests were probably represented when they were making the rules and the squeeky wheel gets the grease.
When I was on the Wildlife Conflict Committee the rules agreed on for depredation by coyotes excluded claims for sheep killed by coyotes but cattle were included. Why? The Cattlemans Association showed up at the meetings the Sheep Growers did not.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38473
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2012, 11:56:58 AM »
"Under the new management plan, ranchers can be compensated up to $1,500 per cow for wolf predation classified as "probable." The plan also allows ranchers to be paid up to twice that amount for lost livestock that are "confirmed" to have been killed by wolves on ranches over 100 acres."

Who dreamed up this stupid "rule"?  So the smaller ranchers' livestock isn't considered as valuable as the ranchers who have large acreages?

The reason for that is they are trying to stretch the dollars out in the compensation fund. The larger livestock interests were probably represented when they were making the rules and the squeeky wheel gets the grease.
When I was on the Wildlife Conflict Committee the rules agreed on for depredation by coyotes excluded claims for sheep killed by coyotes but cattle were included. Why? The Cattlemans Association showed up at the meetings the Sheep Growers did not.

The thought that since I own less than 100 acres and if I had cattle killed they are worth less pisses me off too. But I think Humptuplips is probably right, the cattlemen have worked hard to get a compensation fund and the state was probably trying to stretch the budget so they made it more acceptable to the cattlemen just to throw them a bone.  :bash:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline turbo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 889
Re: Methow Wolves
« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2012, 11:10:02 AM »
So now we get to pay for a trapper - update - http://www.methowvalleynews.com/story.php?id=8015

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by trophyhunt
[Today at 08:04:15 AM]


Looking for English Pointer pup (Elhew and/or Guard Rail lines) by Tafinder
[Today at 07:22:10 AM]


Steel Targets??? by rem700300
[Today at 06:54:16 AM]


Buying pheasants for training by trapp01
[Yesterday at 08:44:40 PM]


Mt. Spokane North Moose by Farmer72
[Yesterday at 08:12:24 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by First timer
[Yesterday at 03:13:57 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:05:06 AM]


Oregon results posted. by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 08:51:12 AM]


best draw for moose unit wise by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:31:10 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by trophyelk6x6
[Yesterday at 08:24:13 AM]


2025 OILS! by Ridgerunner
[Yesterday at 07:40:49 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by lhrbull
[Yesterday at 06:59:24 AM]


Nooksack Archery Tag by LongBomb
[Yesterday at 06:29:37 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by Turner89
[June 13, 2025, 11:33:35 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[June 13, 2025, 09:54:06 PM]


Basin elk by hughjorgan
[June 13, 2025, 09:50:49 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal