collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???  (Read 3870 times)

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Casino is open but not the woods  :bash:....not to mention the thousands of people walking around the fireworks stands the last 3 weeks....  good stuff.

And the cowards at Hancock STILL wont answer any questions/e-mails.

Offline Thehowler

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 957
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2020, 09:58:45 PM »
Hancock will give you your money back if you ask, according to a email they sent out the end of last week.
MAGA

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2020, 10:07:53 PM »
Hancock will give you your money back if you ask, according to a email they sent out the end of last week.


Thats their cop out.... so they dont have to answer any questions. I dont want my money back... just want what I paid for.  If there was even the smallest reason to shut the woods down I would understand but there isnt.... if the Mucks dont want people on their land then stop selling permits. Hiding behind a pandemic is pathetic.

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #18 on: July 08, 2020, 05:11:47 PM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.

Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...

Online bigtex

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 9471
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #19 on: July 08, 2020, 06:26:45 PM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.
Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...
When you pay an individual/corporation to access their land it's a trespass fee.

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #20 on: July 08, 2020, 08:11:24 PM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.
Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...
When you pay an individual/corporation to access their land it's a trespass fee.


Never heard that in my life... I'm not trespassing so  :dunno:

Edit:

I looked up the term and it is not a "trespass fee" .  Not that it matters what someone calls it I suppose.  The Hancock permit doesn't fall into the definition however.

Offline yorketransport

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3274
  • Location: Yelm
  • I'm sorry, it's my fault I'll try harder next time
    • https://www.facebook.com/scapegoatenterprises/
    • Scapegoat Enterprises
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #21 on: July 08, 2020, 09:21:15 PM »
Hancock will give you your money back if you ask, according to a email they sent out the end of last week.


Thats their cop out.... so they dont have to answer any questions. I dont want my money back... just want what I paid for.  If there was even the smallest reason to shut the woods down I would understand but there isnt.... if the Mucks dont want people on their land then stop selling permits. Hiding behind a pandemic is pathetic.

Just to clarify, you paid for a product/service and now you're not happy with that product/service. You've been given the option to have your money returned, but you don't want your money back. So now you want them to change the product/service that they're offering, in order to accommodate what YOU feel is right?
 
So what do you feel is the appropriate access for a private entity to allow you to have to their private property? Should they check with permit holders before they make business decisions about how to manage their own land?
Scapegoat Enterprises Custom Shirts and Decals

Online bigtex

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 9471
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2020, 09:44:51 PM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.
Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...
When you pay an individual/corporation to access their land it's a trespass fee.
Never heard that in my life... I'm not trespassing so  :dunno:

Edit:

I looked up the term and it is not a "trespass fee" .  Not that it matters what someone calls it I suppose.  The Hancock permit doesn't fall into the definition however.
Well there's no legal definition of it in WA, so not sure how you looked up the "term." When you pay someone to access their land that would otherwise be off limits to you it's a trespass fee, it's been mentioned in just about every hunting magazine out there.

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #23 on: July 09, 2020, 07:54:18 AM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.

Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...

You are obviously new to this.  What Bigtex says is absolutely correct.  A trespass fee is what you are paying when you purchase a recreational access pass.  With concerns to what effects the timber business, well it's pretty simple.  Anything the timber says effects it is what effects it.  You want to pick mushrooms?  That effects the timber business.  You want to hunt, same.  Want to walk or drive on the log roads that timber trucks drive on, same.  This is one of those things that people just don't seem to get.  It's not for the permit holder to decide what he does on timber land, even though he purchased a permit.  It is for the timber company to decide what they are willing to let you do on their land.  If you don't believe me then you have never been locked out of a permit area because of burn conditions.


Sigh.... Yeah... I am new to "this".  Only been buying a Hancock permit since the day they started selling them  :rolleyes:

Whats odd is that this is the first time they have ever shut the woods down other than for fire danger, which is an understandable decision.

Has nothing to do with the logging industry up there and thanks for letting me know its not up for the permit holder to decide.... totally didnt know that.

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #24 on: July 09, 2020, 07:56:43 AM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.
Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...
When you pay an individual/corporation to access their land it's a trespass fee.
Never heard that in my life... I'm not trespassing so  :dunno:

Edit:

I looked up the term and it is not a "trespass fee" .  Not that it matters what someone calls it I suppose.  The Hancock permit doesn't fall into the definition however.
Well there's no legal definition of it in WA, so not sure how you looked up the "term." When you pay someone to access their land that would otherwise be off limits to you it's a trespass fee, it's been mentioned in just about every hunting magazine out there.


GOOGLE the term for the definition.

Riddle me this Big Tex.... Why is the term "trespass fee" NEVER been mentioned on any piece of the documentation packet  Hancock provides when buying the permit??   

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #25 on: July 09, 2020, 07:59:19 AM »
Hancock will give you your money back if you ask, according to a email they sent out the end of last week.


Thats their cop out.... so they dont have to answer any questions. I dont want my money back... just want what I paid for.  If there was even the smallest reason to shut the woods down I would understand but there isnt.... if the Mucks dont want people on their land then stop selling permits. Hiding behind a pandemic is pathetic.

Just to clarify, you paid for a product/service and now you're not happy with that product/service. You've been given the option to have your money returned, but you don't want your money back. So now you want them to change the product/service that they're offering, in order to accommodate what YOU feel is right?
 
So what do you feel is the appropriate access for a private entity to allow you to have to their private property? Should they check with permit holders before they make business decisions about how to manage their own land?


Why, in your opinion, is WR the only area shut down??  Just curious as to your familiarity with the area/situation.

Online bigtex

  • Non-Hunting & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 9471
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #26 on: July 09, 2020, 08:38:54 AM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.
Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...
When you pay an individual/corporation to access their land it's a trespass fee.
Never heard that in my life... I'm not trespassing so  :dunno:

Edit:

I looked up the term and it is not a "trespass fee" .  Not that it matters what someone calls it I suppose.  The Hancock permit doesn't fall into the definition however.
Well there's no legal definition of it in WA, so not sure how you looked up the "term." When you pay someone to access their land that would otherwise be off limits to you it's a trespass fee, it's been mentioned in just about every hunting magazine out there.
GOOGLE the term for the definition.

Riddle me this Big Tex.... Why is the term "trespass fee" NEVER been mentioned on any piece of the documentation packet  Hancock provides when buying the permit??
I did GOOGLE it! The first thing that pops up is: "What is a trespass fee? At the simplest, a trespass fee is a charge to access property on which to hunt. It's usually a per day, per hunter (or gun) fee. Trespass fees are common in places like South Dakota where many hunters are there to freelance, or hunt on their own, without the assistance of an outfitter."

Just because YOU don't like the term, doesn't mean that's not what it is. The vast majority of people know when they are paying to access timberlands it's a trespass fee. Timber companies can call it whatever they want, but it's a trespass fee.

Offline highside74

  • Political Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1862
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #27 on: July 09, 2020, 08:54:35 AM »
Maybe just say...

Paying private non commercial property owner is "Trespass Fee"

Paying commercial for profit property owner is "Access Fee"

It's all semantics anyway

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #28 on: July 09, 2020, 09:12:37 AM »
Maybe just say...

Paying private non commercial property owner is "Trespass Fee"

Paying commercial for profit property owner is "Access Fee"

It's all semantics anyway

Yep

Offline Rookie24

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 44
  • Groups: fun
Re: Kapowsin and Eatinville open but NOT White River???
« Reply #29 on: July 09, 2020, 09:16:44 AM »
What exactly do you believe you paid for? 

I'm one hundred percent certain that your recreational access permit allows you to do certain specific recreational activities in exchange for a trespass fee.  What you payed for is limited/restricted access to someone else's land when it doesn't adversely effect the timber business that land was originally acquired for.
Trespass fee??  What the hell are you talking about??  How would it effect their timber industry??  Good lord man...
When you pay an individual/corporation to access their land it's a trespass fee.
Never heard that in my life... I'm not trespassing so  :dunno:

Edit:

I looked up the term and it is not a "trespass fee" .  Not that it matters what someone calls it I suppose.  The Hancock permit doesn't fall into the definition however.
Well there's no legal definition of it in WA, so not sure how you looked up the "term." When you pay someone to access their land that would otherwise be off limits to you it's a trespass fee, it's been mentioned in just about every hunting magazine out there.
GOOGLE the term for the definition.

Riddle me this Big Tex.... Why is the term "trespass fee" NEVER been mentioned on any piece of the documentation packet  Hancock provides when buying the permit??
I did GOOGLE it! The first thing that pops up is: "What is a trespass fee? At the simplest, a trespass fee is a charge to access property on which to hunt. It's usually a per day, per hunter (or gun) fee. Trespass fees are common in places like South Dakota where many hunters are there to freelance, or hunt on their own, without the assistance of an outfitter."

Just because YOU don't like the term, doesn't mean that's not what it is. The vast majority of people know when they are paying to access timberlands it's a trespass fee. Timber companies can call it whatever they want, but it's a trespass fee.

“Usually a per day...”

Case... closed. Thanks for making my point.

And.... MANY buy the permit and dont hunt so....  there is that too boyo.


What is also odd that NO ONE calls it that except for a couple cats on a forum that more than likely have never stepped foot on Hancock managed land.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

WTS Badlands clothing by kukusya
[Today at 09:12:59 AM]


FS-Browning Micro Midas 2 Youth Bow by wamuledeer
[Today at 09:09:33 AM]


Cowiche Bull by yotesnmore
[Today at 09:07:03 AM]


Coturnix quail? by jackelope
[Today at 09:06:50 AM]


Trail cam videos by jstone
[Today at 08:59:04 AM]


87+ Miles in by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 08:41:37 AM]


17 year wait {nooksack archery } by jk78
[Today at 08:35:27 AM]


1995 Smokercraft Ultima 175 by Goose Noose
[Today at 08:02:29 AM]


Kuiu attack 34 by AdamT253
[Today at 08:00:00 AM]


Little Pathfinder's first bear by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 07:53:42 AM]


Special picture and note for all you wolf lovers by jackelope
[Today at 07:30:37 AM]


Tikka T3 300 WM stainless with muzzle brake. by MHWASH
[Today at 07:30:24 AM]


Calling Bears ?? by jrebel
[Today at 07:28:23 AM]


Montana Surplus list by JakeLand
[Today at 06:27:08 AM]


Icicle outfitters by huntnfmly
[Today at 06:18:36 AM]


Lockdown comfort food (or any food!) by jennabug
[Today at 05:40:52 AM]


Need contact info for Bugs n Bones by bugs n bones
[Today at 05:20:41 AM]


2020 bears by Sutherland
[Today at 05:20:00 AM]


Box Canyon Dam or Boundary Dam by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 11:57:21 PM]


FS Herter’s Game Cart $45 NEW PRICE by BD1
[Yesterday at 11:30:14 PM]