Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: cougforester on September 20, 2020, 06:48:54 PMQuote from: Ridgeratt on September 20, 2020, 06:37:47 PMIf you research the trend reports from the wdfw back in the early 2000. Dana Base wrote that the position of the wdfw was to not encourage the expansion of the elk herd west of the Columbia River. Some place in all my files I have the report. But it still should be public information.The Selkirk Elk Plan that was written in 2014 clearly states that they have a desire to INCREASE the Selkirk herd by roughly 1,000 elk. EDIT: Did you mean east of the river?They were talking about units 101,105
Quote from: Ridgeratt on September 20, 2020, 06:37:47 PMIf you research the trend reports from the wdfw back in the early 2000. Dana Base wrote that the position of the wdfw was to not encourage the expansion of the elk herd west of the Columbia River. Some place in all my files I have the report. But it still should be public information.The Selkirk Elk Plan that was written in 2014 clearly states that they have a desire to INCREASE the Selkirk herd by roughly 1,000 elk. EDIT: Did you mean east of the river?
If you research the trend reports from the wdfw back in the early 2000. Dana Base wrote that the position of the wdfw was to not encourage the expansion of the elk herd west of the Columbia River. Some place in all my files I have the report. But it still should be public information.
Pre wolf introduction elk herd or 17K down to a bit over 2K now.
Quote from: Ridgeratt on September 20, 2020, 07:27:46 PMQuote from: cougforester on September 20, 2020, 06:48:54 PMQuote from: Ridgeratt on September 20, 2020, 06:37:47 PMIf you research the trend reports from the wdfw back in the early 2000. Dana Base wrote that the position of the wdfw was to not encourage the expansion of the elk herd west of the Columbia River. Some place in all my files I have the report. But it still should be public information.The Selkirk Elk Plan that was written in 2014 clearly states that they have a desire to INCREASE the Selkirk herd by roughly 1,000 elk. EDIT: Did you mean east of the river?They were talking about units 101,105Gotcha. Hm. I've not seen that but if it's out there, it's out there! Quote from: WapitiTalk1 on September 20, 2020, 07:23:37 PMPre wolf introduction elk herd or 17K down to a bit over 2K now. The herd used to be 17k?!?
Some HistoryWhen I was a kid there were almost no elk in NE WA, they were only found in a few small areas of the NE, mainly in GMU 113. For many years the WDFW's top priority was to maintain NE WA as primary whitetail habitat. The first unit that was managed for elk was GMU 113. There was open season on any elk you saw in other GMU's, anyone could shoot bulls, cows, or calves. Miraculously the elk ever so slowly increased, elk slowly moved in from Idaho and from B.C., most likely elk numbers increased only because of the heavy cover and many places to hide. Local hunters became more fond of elk hunting and put a lot of pressure on WDFW to stop the killing of cows and calves. After a good many years WDFW finally started managing more GMU's for elk and eventually eliminated the any elk season in other NE units. This took literally decades of complaining to get WDFW to finally allow the elk to increase!