collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 16687 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8935
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3075
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9678
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 blacktail rut thread by Mulie87
[Today at 12:10:15 AM]


Surrounded by elk and this guy walks right up to me by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 10:49:09 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Chukarhead
[Yesterday at 10:34:20 PM]


Afraid of the Wasteways by McCRIZZLEY
[Yesterday at 09:44:21 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by Tball77
[Yesterday at 09:25:35 PM]


mushroom id on a hemlock by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 09:19:29 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 09:16:24 PM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by huntingfool7
[Yesterday at 08:57:47 PM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by 762Gunner
[Yesterday at 08:53:46 PM]


Snohomish River Hunting by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 08:35:20 PM]


Grizzly? by ctwiggs1
[Yesterday at 08:29:12 PM]


117 moose tag anyone? by sled
[Yesterday at 07:56:08 PM]


More special privileges by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 07:22:31 PM]


Spur of the moment hunt by full choke
[Yesterday at 06:24:23 PM]


Second Chance Bull by milldozer
[Yesterday at 05:35:06 PM]


Sure glad cougars are solitary animals. by dreadi
[Yesterday at 12:36:34 PM]


Newbie quail hunter by salish
[Yesterday at 11:51:11 AM]


Slide Ridge Quality tag holders by deadyote
[Yesterday at 11:50:08 AM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 11:37:10 AM]


As He Lay by redi
[Yesterday at 11:09:04 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal