collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 17110 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8988
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3079
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9693
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Found after 2 days, meat worth anything? by Doublelunger
[Today at 02:14:30 PM]


Trap Check Time by TeacherMan
[Today at 01:32:10 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Caseyd
[Today at 12:24:36 PM]


Late Achery Hunt 💥VIDEO💥 by oldschool
[Today at 11:43:19 AM]


The first Moose tags. by Pathfinder101
[Today at 10:56:48 AM]


Hunting Exotics in Texas by jstone
[Today at 10:53:06 AM]


New bow ideas by Dreaded Archer24
[Today at 09:56:06 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by luvmystang67
[Today at 09:48:24 AM]


Rut Buddies by ballpark
[Today at 09:44:24 AM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Today at 09:22:02 AM]


Cell Cams for Westside Elk by Dreaded Archer24
[Today at 09:20:01 AM]


Is it a conflict of interest by 10thmountainarcher
[Today at 08:26:22 AM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:22:40 AM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by BKMFR
[Today at 07:53:54 AM]


Aquapod/Sneak boat by bhammac
[Today at 07:47:45 AM]


Illinois, No Doubter by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:38:27 AM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by blackdog
[Today at 07:21:34 AM]


Where can one find hides from hunters? by MightyWhite
[Today at 04:57:11 AM]


Seekins PH3 by dreadi
[Yesterday at 11:42:42 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by Sitka_Blacktail
[Yesterday at 10:15:35 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal