collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 15848 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 475
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8873
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3066
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9672
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Today at 07:57:50 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:51:40 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by MADMAX
[Today at 07:33:08 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Feathernfurr
[Today at 05:27:02 PM]


Re gearing the hunting rig by colersu22
[Today at 04:43:26 PM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by MR5x5
[Today at 03:46:57 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by elkaholic123
[Today at 01:34:10 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by Shooter4
[Today at 01:23:15 PM]


Quality tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:02:57 PM]


2025 opener by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:57:00 AM]


Talking About Barely Legal by lewy
[Today at 10:00:55 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 09:06:30 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 07:42:22 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal