collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 21464 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 546
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 9091
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3078
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9716
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Youth turkey season 2026 by buglebuster
[Today at 09:25:59 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Machias
[Today at 09:25:40 AM]


Now we wait(Montana) by vandeman17
[Today at 08:34:09 AM]


That first elk encounter… by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 08:32:47 AM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by 30.06
[Today at 08:22:28 AM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by Bullkllr
[Today at 08:05:54 AM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by Liroy
[Today at 03:58:58 AM]


September Mule Deer in the High Country by basedacid
[Yesterday at 09:35:22 PM]


Small plastic boats? by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 07:10:47 PM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by dreadi
[Yesterday at 06:54:20 PM]


Hoof rot by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:23:05 PM]


ITA Clean-Up Fur Sale by Trapper John
[Yesterday at 01:46:08 PM]


Spring bear 2026 by calahanhuntingco
[Yesterday at 12:57:38 PM]


Turkey Fan/beard Plaques by fire*guy
[Yesterday at 11:45:41 AM]


12th Annual - 2026 YOUTH TURKEY HUNT CONTEST (enter by Mar 15) by hunterednate
[Yesterday at 11:01:48 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by dreadi
[Yesterday at 09:40:13 AM]


Hunter saves deer's life -Cool vid by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 08:57:39 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal