collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Antelope survey  (Read 3478 times)

Offline Brushcrawler

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2016
  • Posts: 515
  • Location: West side
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #15 on: January 01, 2025, 08:28:26 PM »
Thanks for the information and the work on this project. Maybe someday they will take hold to the point they can be a growing population.
There is not enough wilderness left in the world, or in the hearts of men.

Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1157
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2025, 10:39:36 AM »
The antelope were released twice on the Yakama reservation. The Colvilles had a separate release on their reservation.

https://conservationnw.org/our-work/wildlife/pronghorn-antelope/

I'm not sure why Con NW was mentioned since they didn't (and don't) have a frickin' thing to do with the reintroduction efforts.  For that matter, neither did WDFW!!!

Here's a video of what actually happened.  SCI, Nevada, and the Yakima tribe were the instrumental parties.

https://sci-washington.com/index.html
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline dwils233

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 558
  • Location: Spokane County
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2025, 10:59:16 AM »
The antelope were released twice on the Yakama reservation. The Colvilles had a separate release on their reservation.

https://conservationnw.org/our-work/wildlife/pronghorn-antelope/

I'm not sure why Con NW was mentioned since they didn't (and don't) have a frickin' thing to do with the reintroduction efforts.  For that matter, neither did WDFW!!!

Here's a video of what actually happened.  SCI, Nevada, and the Yakima tribe were the instrumental parties.

https://sci-washington.com/index.html

Well there seems to be two parallel reintroduction efforts- one by the Yakama Nation and the other by the CCT. Whereas the Yakama worked closely with SCI on reintroduction, it's not explicitly clear what the overlap/engagement of the CCT and Con NW is (or is not).

Might be worth asking the CCT?  might be quiet funding it, monitoring, working with the Tribal NR staff, etc.

At the end of the day, these are both TRIBAL releases because no one else (ie SCI or Con NW) can bring wildlife into the state for such an effort without a Tribe or the WDFW. Who supports them and how credit gets shared is their business really
A promise made is a debt unpaid, and the trail has its own stern code

Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1157
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2025, 11:20:56 AM »
The antelope were released twice on the Yakama reservation. The Colvilles had a separate release on their reservation.

https://conservationnw.org/our-work/wildlife/pronghorn-antelope/

I'm not sure why Con NW was mentioned since they didn't (and don't) have a frickin' thing to do with the reintroduction efforts.  For that matter, neither did WDFW!!!

Here's a video of what actually happened.  SCI, Nevada, and the Yakima tribe were the instrumental parties.

https://sci-washington.com/index.html

Well there seems to be two parallel reintroduction efforts- one by the Yakama Nation and the other by the CCT. Whereas the Yakama worked closely with SCI on reintroduction, it's not explicitly clear what the overlap/engagement of the CCT and Con NW is (or is not).

Might be worth asking the CCT?  might be quiet funding it, monitoring, working with the Tribal NR staff, etc.

At the end of the day, these are both TRIBAL releases because no one else (ie SCI or Con NW) can bring wildlife into the state for such an effort without a Tribe or the WDFW. Who supports them and how credit gets shared is their business really

Agreed.  The reintroduction had to be facilitated by the tribes since WDFW was originally adamantly against bringing pronghorn back to Washington.  CCT used some shared information from SCI and Nevada, but they did their reintroductions autonomously.

In my opinion they have some of the best wildlife biologists in the state. 
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline teal101

  • Team Kramer Farms
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 895
  • Location: Cashmere
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2025, 01:10:14 PM »
Saw a decent buck this last spring on the Colville Rez.  Cool to see them around.

Offline wa.hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 181
  • Location: snoqualmie
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2025, 09:17:12 PM »
Sure was hoping that there were some eyes in that area that had seen some antelope recently.  We are still doing he survey on the 18th and don’t want to miss any.  If you know of any recent sightings please let me know.. I will spend a couple days over there trying to find them in areas I am not familiar with them being in..

Offline TeacherMan

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4311
  • Location: North Idaho
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #21 on: January 13, 2025, 09:33:53 PM »
Any idea the total numbers in Washington?
If you shoot the first one you will never get that true trophy.

Offline Roslyn Rambler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2024
  • Posts: 46
  • Location: Central Wa
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2025, 09:12:14 AM »
The antelope you are seeing north of I -90 are a result of the Colville Nation transplant. Their release also was on tribal lands north of the Columbia River. However these animals seem to know where they came from and also headed back to Nevada and swam the Columbia where a few did not make it..there were at one time 6 over by Ritzville north of the hiway which reduced somehow to just 2 does and they have not been seen in the last 2 years .. there are still sufficient numbers in the Mansfield/ Waterville area.. we are not a part of that survey so not sure what is going on with WDFW on surveys there.. I do know that some of the cattle grazing allotments on DNR land have those individuals complains about loosing grazing allotments due to the antelope.

To clarify, headed back towards Nevada, or, were actually successful on that journey?

( Edit to add )

I've watched a few documentaries on Antelope migration. Lots of articles and studies. I'll add a quote... "the “Great Migration” route of the pronghorns, one of the greatest migrations in North America.  Each fall and spring, 300-400 pronghorns (down from 6,000)  migrate 150 miles from their summer birthing grounds in Grand Teton National Park to their winter grounds near Pinedale, Wyoming.  This great migration, named by biologists as the “Path of the Pronghorn” is remarkable and one of the last long-distance animal migrations in the world"

I drew a straight line from the Yakama Nation to the Oregon / Nevada border. Assuming they came from NW Nevada. 350 miles +-. That's double the distance, or more, of the Wyoming antelope journey. Pretty remarkable and worth it's own amazing story. Thanks for sharing all the information. Super cool!!!
« Last Edit: January 19, 2025, 09:32:50 AM by Roslyn Rambler »

Offline wa.hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 181
  • Location: snoqualmie
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #23 on: January 23, 2025, 08:58:16 AM »
For those interested the survey involved 7 groups of pairs. We covered from the Columbia River north to Yakama Nation property..from Richland to Goldendale. 3 of the 7 groups found antelope. Each group spent approximately 4 hours driving  their route and met in Bickelton. This survey was done primarily by 3 SCI chapters with the locations of antelope to be shared with WDFW whom I believe will do an airiel survey at some point.
Our groups found 183 antelope. With a high buck to doe/fawn ratio. A lot of areas were not covered do to access and time involved with the survey.

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 17608
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #24 on: January 23, 2025, 11:05:42 AM »
For those interested the survey involved 7 groups of pairs. We covered from the Columbia River north to Yakama Nation property..from Richland to Goldendale. 3 of the 7 groups found antelope. Each group spent approximately 4 hours driving  their route and met in Bickelton. This survey was done primarily by 3 SCI chapters with the locations of antelope to be shared with WDFW whom I believe will do an airiel survey at some point.
Our groups found 183 antelope. With a high buck to doe/fawn ratio. A lot of areas were not covered do to access and time involved with the survey.

Thanks so much for the follow up.

It sounds like they're doing pretty good. 
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline kselkhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1608
  • Location: United States
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #25 on: January 23, 2025, 11:08:09 AM »
Agreed, thanks for the follow up on how the survey went.  It's good to see the work being put in to track the antelope herds and monitor health and long term longevity. 

Offline lhrbull

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 355
  • Groups: wafsf mdf sci
Re: Antelope survey
« Reply #26 on: February 01, 2025, 09:49:21 AM »
Did anyone hear the results

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Canada mule deer outfitter recommendation by cwuhunter
[Today at 11:24:47 AM]


Score this 3 point by boneaddict
[Today at 10:45:42 AM]


Ice Fishing Anyone! by Southpole
[Today at 10:12:04 AM]


Kids first sheds by jrebel
[Today at 09:48:30 AM]


2024 wa quality tag filled by Onlybucks
[Today at 09:47:10 AM]


Low cost guns that just flat out shoot? by b23
[Today at 09:28:25 AM]


Guess the score of this typical by nwwanderer
[Today at 09:19:58 AM]


Would you check someone else’s trail cam? by big wood
[Today at 08:55:51 AM]


SENATE TO VOTE ON INSLEE'S COMMISIONERS - NEED ACTION NOW! by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 08:49:52 AM]


Measure this by Romulus
[Today at 08:30:16 AM]


Anti 2A Bills/ 2025 Legislation by CarbonHunter
[Today at 08:27:32 AM]


OBS Ford seat options by ChesapeakeMan
[Today at 06:41:45 AM]


HB 1775 Prohibiting the production of fur products by Humptulips
[Today at 12:26:36 AM]


Gun broker? by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 11:51:18 PM]


Non-residents in Idaho Shed Hunting by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 06:42:37 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal