Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:35:41 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on January 15, 2013, 03:21:23 PMQuote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:17:57 PMQuote from: Bob33 on January 15, 2013, 03:08:42 PMI have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not.Previous to Summer 2012 unlawfully posting land to prevent hunting/fishing was a misdemeanor in WA. As a result of the change in fish and wildlife laws last year it was decriminalized and was made into a infraction. So it is now the same fine as barbed hooks, no hunter orange, etc.I think it should have stayed a misdemeanor, it's not like anybody doesn't know where their land ends.Unfortunately when the State Supreme Court decided all criminal matters must be brought before a judge it meant all WDFW criminal cases would have to go before a judge, whereas before most could be handled by simply paying a ticket. Unfortunately this meant courts would be even more backloggedIn WDFW's opinion it was best to decriminalize certain offenses so they would not flood the courts even more. WDFW made the decision to decriminalize offenses that didn't impact a resource. As a result this violation went from a misdemeanor to a infraction.I think in the next couple years you will continue to see agencies decriminalize certain offenses so they could realistically enforce them Why couldn't they be charged with "Harasses, intimidates, or interferes with an individual engaged in the lawful taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife" which is a misdemeanor? By posting their land and telling me I can't go on, they are interfering with me.http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=77.15.210(1) A person is guilty of obstructing the taking of fish[, shellfish,] or wildlife if the person: (a) Harasses, drives, or disturbs fish, shellfish, or wildlife with the intent of disrupting lawful pursuit or taking thereof; or (b) Harasses, intimidates, or interferes with an individual engaged in the lawful taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife or lawful predator control with the intent of disrupting lawful pursuit or taking thereof. (2) Obstructing the taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife is a gross misdemeanor.
Quote from: Jonathan_S on January 15, 2013, 03:21:23 PMQuote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:17:57 PMQuote from: Bob33 on January 15, 2013, 03:08:42 PMI have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not.Previous to Summer 2012 unlawfully posting land to prevent hunting/fishing was a misdemeanor in WA. As a result of the change in fish and wildlife laws last year it was decriminalized and was made into a infraction. So it is now the same fine as barbed hooks, no hunter orange, etc.I think it should have stayed a misdemeanor, it's not like anybody doesn't know where their land ends.Unfortunately when the State Supreme Court decided all criminal matters must be brought before a judge it meant all WDFW criminal cases would have to go before a judge, whereas before most could be handled by simply paying a ticket. Unfortunately this meant courts would be even more backloggedIn WDFW's opinion it was best to decriminalize certain offenses so they would not flood the courts even more. WDFW made the decision to decriminalize offenses that didn't impact a resource. As a result this violation went from a misdemeanor to a infraction.I think in the next couple years you will continue to see agencies decriminalize certain offenses so they could realistically enforce them
Quote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:17:57 PMQuote from: Bob33 on January 15, 2013, 03:08:42 PMI have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not.Previous to Summer 2012 unlawfully posting land to prevent hunting/fishing was a misdemeanor in WA. As a result of the change in fish and wildlife laws last year it was decriminalized and was made into a infraction. So it is now the same fine as barbed hooks, no hunter orange, etc.I think it should have stayed a misdemeanor, it's not like anybody doesn't know where their land ends.
Quote from: Bob33 on January 15, 2013, 03:08:42 PMI have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not.Previous to Summer 2012 unlawfully posting land to prevent hunting/fishing was a misdemeanor in WA. As a result of the change in fish and wildlife laws last year it was decriminalized and was made into a infraction. So it is now the same fine as barbed hooks, no hunter orange, etc.
I have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on January 15, 2013, 03:42:29 PMBigtex, there is a county road on Vulcan Mtn here in Ferry County, that has been posted by the WDFW, no motor vesicles beyond this sign. The county plows that road with my taxpayer money, so why would that be posted ? The road goes about 1 1/2 miles and ends into private land of which I have permission to access.Campmeat,Honestly can't say for sure. Usually those signs are meant to be placed in areas where people have illegally driven off the road and created their own road, or spur roads where people aren't suppose to go. Sorry can't be more help.
Bigtex, there is a county road on Vulcan Mtn here in Ferry County, that has been posted by the WDFW, no motor vesicles beyond this sign. The county plows that road with my taxpayer money, so why would that be posted ? The road goes about 1 1/2 miles and ends into private land of which I have permission to access.
Quote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:48:24 PMQuote from: CAMPMEAT on January 15, 2013, 03:42:29 PMBigtex, there is a county road on Vulcan Mtn here in Ferry County, that has been posted by the WDFW, no motor vesicles beyond this sign. The county plows that road with my taxpayer money, so why would that be posted ? The road goes about 1 1/2 miles and ends into private land of which I have permission to access.Campmeat,Honestly can't say for sure. Usually those signs are meant to be placed in areas where people have illegally driven off the road and created their own road, or spur roads where people aren't suppose to go. Sorry can't be more help.I thought it was unusual since I know all the landowners up there, all 2 of them..
Quote from: Bob33 on January 15, 2013, 03:46:02 PMQuote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:35:41 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on January 15, 2013, 03:21:23 PMQuote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:17:57 PMQuote from: Bob33 on January 15, 2013, 03:08:42 PMI have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not.Previous to Summer 2012 unlawfully posting land to prevent hunting/fishing was a misdemeanor in WA. As a result of the change in fish and wildlife laws last year it was decriminalized and was made into a infraction. So it is now the same fine as barbed hooks, no hunter orange, etc.I think it should have stayed a misdemeanor, it's not like anybody doesn't know where their land ends.Unfortunately when the State Supreme Court decided all criminal matters must be brought before a judge it meant all WDFW criminal cases would have to go before a judge, whereas before most could be handled by simply paying a ticket. Unfortunately this meant courts would be even more backloggedIn WDFW's opinion it was best to decriminalize certain offenses so they would not flood the courts even more. WDFW made the decision to decriminalize offenses that didn't impact a resource. As a result this violation went from a misdemeanor to a infraction.I think in the next couple years you will continue to see agencies decriminalize certain offenses so they could realistically enforce them Why couldn't they be charged with "Harasses, intimidates, or interferes with an individual engaged in the lawful taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife" which is a misdemeanor? By posting their land and telling me I can't go on, they are interfering with me.http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=77.15.210(1) A person is guilty of obstructing the taking of fish[, shellfish,] or wildlife if the person: (a) Harasses, drives, or disturbs fish, shellfish, or wildlife with the intent of disrupting lawful pursuit or taking thereof; or (b) Harasses, intimidates, or interferes with an individual engaged in the lawful taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife or lawful predator control with the intent of disrupting lawful pursuit or taking thereof. (2) Obstructing the taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife is a gross misdemeanor.Because the actual violation is RCW 77.15.160(4)(c):Posting signs: Posting signs preventing hunting or fishing on any land not owned or leased by the person doing the posting, or without the permission of the person who owns, leases, or controls the land posted.http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=77.15.160Which is an infraction.In the RCW Bob posted the term "interfer" typically is referred to when someone comes out and starts banging pots and pans when they see you sneaking up on a deer for example. In fact RCW 77.15.210 is rarely used because it can be hard to prove.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on January 15, 2013, 03:55:57 PMQuote from: bigtex on January 15, 2013, 03:48:24 PMQuote from: CAMPMEAT on January 15, 2013, 03:42:29 PMBigtex, there is a county road on Vulcan Mtn here in Ferry County, that has been posted by the WDFW, no motor vesicles beyond this sign. The county plows that road with my taxpayer money, so why would that be posted ? The road goes about 1 1/2 miles and ends into private land of which I have permission to access.Campmeat,Honestly can't say for sure. Usually those signs are meant to be placed in areas where people have illegally driven off the road and created their own road, or spur roads where people aren't suppose to go. Sorry can't be more help.I thought it was unusual since I know all the landowners up there, all 2 of them..And it may be someone stole a WDFW sign and posted it to keep someone away, thinking it looks more official. I have seen timber company no trespassing signs many miles away from any of their property.
Isn't it interesting that it says PRIVATE ROAD NO TRESPASSING in big bold letters and then "on deeded land" below it in smaller text.
Quote from: boneaddict on January 15, 2013, 03:49:04 PMQuote from: huntnphool on January 15, 2013, 03:41:01 PMThere is a large chunk of land in the Methow that used to be owned by old Doc. Prewett (sp) but was purchased by the state yet its still posted as private as well.Still bugs the hell out of me and I wish I could get to the bottom of it. His neighbor just did the same thing. Tack on another couple thousand acres. It would end up costing me some time in court but I seriously doubt they could convict me for hunting on that land since its been purchased by the state.
Quote from: huntnphool on January 15, 2013, 03:41:01 PMThere is a large chunk of land in the Methow that used to be owned by old Doc. Prewett (sp) but was purchased by the state yet its still posted as private as well.Still bugs the hell out of me and I wish I could get to the bottom of it. His neighbor just did the same thing. Tack on another couple thousand acres.
There is a large chunk of land in the Methow that used to be owned by old Doc. Prewett (sp) but was purchased by the state yet its still posted as private as well.
Quote from: huntnphool on January 15, 2013, 03:54:19 PMQuote from: boneaddict on January 15, 2013, 03:49:04 PMQuote from: huntnphool on January 15, 2013, 03:41:01 PMThere is a large chunk of land in the Methow that used to be owned by old Doc. Prewett (sp) but was purchased by the state yet its still posted as private as well.Still bugs the hell out of me and I wish I could get to the bottom of it. His neighbor just did the same thing. Tack on another couple thousand acres. It would end up costing me some time in court but I seriously doubt they could convict me for hunting on that land since its been purchased by the state.He still patrols it like its his own personal game farm too.
I have software on my GPS that shows property boundaries and ownership. I have encountered multiple situations in Washington and other states with public land posted as private. I believe it is intentionally done in the vast majority of instances. It is wrong, and should be illegal if it is not. I kind of enjoy finding these conditions, especially if the landowner visits. When told that harassing and interfering with a legal hunt is criminal, and that I'd be glad to call the sheriff and wait for him to come clear it up, the landowner usually leaves in a huff.Two years ago I had an outfitter in Wyoming tell me to get off the property I was on. I did the same thing: let's call the sheriff and wait for him to come clear it up. The outfitter immediately left.
I haven't read through all the posts but I think that if someone is posting public land as if it were private then they should do jail time. It should be a form of hunter harassment. Tough to prove, but if you catch 'em in the act.....
so that means its just an infraction if a hunter accidentally drifts onto private land from public while hunting ?
Quote from: Bean Counter on January 15, 2013, 05:44:18 PM so that means its just an infraction if a hunter accidentally drifts onto private land from public while hunting ?Never said that.It is an infraction if someone posts land that is not their land or they post the land without the permission of the landowner.