collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires  (Read 6655 times)

Offline MadHatter

  • Coyote Eradication Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 517
  • Location: Kitsap County
  • Gun Rights Examiner @ Examiner.com
  • Groups: NRA,WPHA,SAF,CCRKB
Re: Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2013, 05:31:47 PM »
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.

Climates do change... But as far as a political agenda, there is no such phenomenon... The earth will regulate and change its climate as it has done for eons, the fact that we are so pompous to think we are the ones solely causing it is nieve at best.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - I DARE YOU

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19406
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #16 on: April 21, 2013, 05:46:12 PM »
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.

JLS what proof/ data do you have?

Hopefully it's not all from AL GORES internets!  :yike:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2013, 06:29:47 PM »
I don't think there's any reason to doubt that the climate is changing. I'm not sure why people dispute it. The only debate is whether it's man caused or natural.

Offline Heredoggydoggy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5041
  • Location: Wenatchee
  • Team I'M TOO OLD FOR THIS $H!T !
Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2013, 06:48:35 PM »
The increase in the numbers of Bark Beetles is another benefit of the "Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires" BS.  Periodic Forest Fires kept the Beetles in check, burned along the ground, and promoted new healthy growth.  The Indians knew that a hundred years ago, but the white man, in his infinite wisdom, knew better.
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.

When Bernie Madoff did it, it's called a "Ponzi Scheme"
When Government does it, it's called "Social Security"

Offline MadHatter

  • Coyote Eradication Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 517
  • Location: Kitsap County
  • Gun Rights Examiner @ Examiner.com
  • Groups: NRA,WPHA,SAF,CCRKB
Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2013, 07:26:49 PM »
The increase in the numbers of Bark Beetles is another benefit of the "Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires" BS.  Periodic Forest Fires kept the Beetles in check, burned along the ground, and promoted new healthy growth.  The Indians knew that a hundred years ago, but the white man, in his infinite wisdom, knew better.

I think this is one of our biggest threats anymore... No longer do fires burn out the forest.  The forest ecosystem is evolved to rely on fire, and we just put them out now and don't let them clean out the forest.  Its frustrating to see 1000 acres in the middle of NOWHERE catch and watch the government spend millions to put it out... My grandfather used to talk of how open the woods used to be, and how you could see 100+ yards even amongst the trees... Now, without a machete you cannot get 10' in most forests because of the undergrowth.  As much as it causes me great pain to say it, CA is starting to get it right... They let more fires burn now, and are even telling people that live in high fire danger areas to make defensible space, its not CALFIRE's job to protect you home if you choose to live in the middle of nowhere.  I have personally seen defensible space work... Guy had about 50-100yds around his house cleared of debris and shrubs... His house survived a pretty bad fire.  You could literally see where the fire parted and went around his house, burning the available fuels. 
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - I DARE YOU

Offline Heredoggydoggy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5041
  • Location: Wenatchee
  • Team I'M TOO OLD FOR THIS $H!T !
Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #20 on: April 21, 2013, 07:34:00 PM »
Last year, just as the wildfires were getting started, my buddy and I were Grouse hunting along the Mission Ridge Trail, and I was astounded at all the dead fallen wood under the live trees.  I haven't been back up there since, but if the fires reached there, there's not a living thing left!
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.

When Bernie Madoff did it, it's called a "Ponzi Scheme"
When Government does it, it's called "Social Security"

Offline Northway

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 469
  • Location: Seattle
Re: Bark Beetle is not the reason for wildfires
« Reply #21 on: April 24, 2013, 05:50:40 PM »
The moral of the story in this article is to push the climate change agenda... Four times in the story mention it, as if pounding saying the same thing over and over makes it more true... :bash:

If you don't believe climate change is real you should.  One doesn't have to be an Al Gore groupie to see the effects of climate change in subalpine and montane environments across the Rocky Mountains and Pacific NW.

I do believe that "climate change" is real, but it seems like a pointless argument. In my opinion we are pot-committed and there's no going back. Without drastic technological advances, pollution will continue to increase globally regardless of what americans do locally to combat it. 
Which side are you on if neither will claim you?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2026 North Central WA Mule Deer Foundation Banquet is approaching! by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 10:20:00 PM]


Hornady SST sabots (250 grain copper) by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM]


Breaking news: Lorna Smith and WWF sue WDFW Director and Deputy Director by hunter100
[Yesterday at 08:37:09 PM]


WDFW proposing to Ban Baiting by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 08:36:24 PM]


Youth turkey season 2026 by Tree Killer
[Yesterday at 07:58:24 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by jstone
[Yesterday at 07:48:59 PM]


Small plastic boats? by DaNewb
[Yesterday at 07:14:28 PM]


Delay of commission investigation+Lorna Smith finally defending hunting??? by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:10:09 PM]


MA10 Blackmouth anyone? by throttlejocky20
[Yesterday at 02:35:47 PM]


suppressor for a 7mm-08 by JohnVH
[Yesterday at 10:16:47 AM]


25-06 factory loads by lhrbull
[Yesterday at 09:46:55 AM]


.45-70 Loads and Twist Rate by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 09:35:11 AM]


Cancellation Alaskan Bear Hunt by Machias
[Yesterday at 09:25:40 AM]


That first elk encounter… by Gonehuntin01
[Yesterday at 08:32:47 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal