collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Accurizing my weatherby  (Read 16766 times)

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4622
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #15 on: November 01, 2013, 12:24:38 PM »
Maybe a cheap alternative might be to try one of those Limbsaver doohickeys that go on the barrel.  I don't use one, but I seem to recall reading that they do indeed work. 

Also, using the powder charge that you arrived at for accuracy, take those loads and play with the seating depth and see if you can fine tune it a little more.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #16 on: November 01, 2013, 12:25:42 PM »
I have a dear friend who spends an inordinate amount of his free time handloading. If "x feet per second" is good, then "x + 10 feet per second" is even better. If a 1" group is good, then .9" is even better.

When fall rolls around, he's got a shelf full of great ammunition...and nothing to use it on. He spends no time scouting or researching new places to hunt. He spends no time meeting landowners, or building relationships with existing contacts.

He then bemoans how "fortunate" I am to have so many hunting opportunities, which probably exceed his by a factor of 10 to 1.

After a while I concluded that he must in some obscure manner enjoy this paradox. More power to him.

I'll take my 1.25" MOA guns and kill critters at any reasonable distance I care to shoot. If it's too far for that (which is somewhere north of 500 yards for deer or larger game), then I can get closer, or pass and keep hunting.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2013, 12:52:14 PM »
Maybe a cheap alternative might be to try one of those Limbsaver doohickeys that go on the barrel.  I don't use one, but I seem to recall reading that they do indeed work. 

Also, using the powder charge that you arrived at for accuracy, take those loads and play with the seating depth and see if you can fine tune it a little more.

We tried messing with seating depths, it really didn't make much of a difference as with weatherbys we can't even come close to touching the lands.

I've never had luck with the Limbsaver barrel deresonators, I did have one on this rifle when I first got it but never saw a difference even when I tried to "tune" it.

Bob, I am tagged out here in washington, have one hunt coming up in two weeks in Montana, then I will have all winter to tinker with things. If I could get a consistent 1.25 MOA out of this rifle I'd be happy, but I cannot. I don't plan on longrange hunting, but my style of hunting I do get shots at 300-400 yards on a regular basis. Getting this rifle as accurate as I can certainly can't hurt anything.

Offline threedwizard

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 175
  • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2013, 12:53:37 PM »
You've heard all great advice here. I agree with full float on the barrel, it really helped my .340 Weatherby. I shoot the Barnes TTSX and R21 and they are great. Shoots excellent groups and the bullet is a hammer. Here's my last sight in earlier this year at 200 yards. No complaints here, and my other Weatherby's all shoot this well. Stick with it, the 300 WBY is a great caliber.

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2013, 01:05:46 PM »
You've heard all great advice here. I agree with full float on the barrel, it really helped my .340 Weatherby. I shoot the Barnes TTSX and R21 and they are great. Shoots excellent groups and the bullet is a hammer. Here's my last sight in earlier this year at 200 yards. No complaints here, and my other Weatherby's all shoot this well. Stick with it, the 300 WBY is a great caliber.

You shoot that with the Ultra Light floated?  Or is it a heavier barrel floated?  If that's the Ultra Light floated that is mighty impressive!
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline jay.sharkbait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 6507
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2013, 01:06:24 PM »
You've heard all great advice here. I agree with full float on the barrel, it really helped my .340 Weatherby. I shoot the Barnes TTSX and R21 and they are great. Shoots excellent groups and the bullet is a hammer. Here's my last sight in earlier this year at 200 yards. No complaints here, and my other Weatherby's all shoot this well. Stick with it, the 300 WBY is a great caliber.

Wasn't R21 discontinued in the 70's?

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2013, 01:14:02 PM »
I floated my .270 ultra light and it shoots lights out

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2013, 01:18:44 PM »
how clean are your first two shots ? whetherby dosnt float the barrel on the lightweights ? I free'd mine up and the three and four shot groups improved  :tup:

I'm going to try this at the range tonight coach you may be onto something, my last 300 yard groups have been bugging me and I may have been looking past this

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #23 on: November 01, 2013, 01:26:27 PM »
I floated my .270 ultra light and it shoots lights out

24" Win or 26" Wby?
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #24 on: November 01, 2013, 01:32:22 PM »
FWIW: I have a Weatherby Ultra Light in 257 Wby. Out of the box I could not get it to shoot consistently well.

The bedding job was, politely speaking, horrible. I free floated it, and accuracy improved but not to a point where I was satisified.

I finally gave up and had it rebarreled with a Benchmark barrel. I'm very happy with it now.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline mrolen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 154
  • Location: the forever blue state
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2013, 01:34:17 PM »
sell it and start over if that is an option. there are better platforms to start from like remington or a tikka
believe the bullet!

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #26 on: November 01, 2013, 01:39:42 PM »
FWIW: I have a Weatherby Ultra Light in 257 Wby. Out of the box I could not get it to shoot consistently well.

The bedding job was, politely speaking, horrible. I free floated it, and accuracy improved but not to a point where I was satisified.

I finally gave up and had it rebarreled with a Benchmark barrel. I'm very happy with it now.

I have the same rifle as well, same thing I've never been impressed with the accuracy.

Do you have a picture of it? I sure like the ultra light weight barrel on these rifles, how heavy of a barrel did you go with? I'd even consider a 24" my 26 with a muzzle break (on the 300) sure gets in the way at times

Offline threedwizard

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 175
  • Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #27 on: November 01, 2013, 01:44:47 PM »
I have a 1 lb. of Reloader 21 here on my bench. Mark V stainless stardard barrel 24". Not an Ultra light, but shouldn't matter much. It took 8 different loads to find the sweet one, and I have the bullet just touch the lands. Builds a lot of pressure, but nothing dangerous. Have shoot over a hundred of these loads in the past decada.

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #28 on: November 01, 2013, 01:52:02 PM »
sell it and start over if that is an option. there are better platforms to start from like remington or a tikka
yu don't work on tikas just shoot them

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Accurizing my weatherby
« Reply #29 on: November 01, 2013, 01:54:53 PM »
I have a 1 lb. of Reloader 21 here on my bench. Mark V stainless stardard barrel 24". Not an Ultra light, but shouldn't matter much. It took 8 different loads to find the sweet one, and I have the bullet just touch the lands. Builds a lot of pressure, but nothing dangerous. Have shoot over a hundred of these loads in the past decada.

Cool!  I didn't know the 340 was offered in a 24" barrel. I also thought it was forbidden to load the TTSX closer than .050" off the lands :dunno:  Surprised you were able to reach the lands with the extended Weatherby free bore.  I was thinking of getting a 240 Wby for kicks but decided against it due to the free bore issues as I've never had much luck with loads that far off the lands.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2013, 02:07:33 PM by RadSav »
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Today at 09:22:42 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Today at 08:17:29 PM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by bigtex
[Today at 08:05:03 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Today at 07:52:24 PM]


E scouting for bears by Candcrods
[Today at 07:32:06 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 07:22:02 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Today at 06:43:35 PM]


Pocket Carry by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 05:11:59 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 03:12:07 PM]


Encouraging on e side by hdshot
[Today at 02:54:51 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Fast Rider
[Today at 12:48:55 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Today at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Today at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Today at 11:36:36 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 09:21:15 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Today at 07:42:37 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Today at 07:19:46 AM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 06:36:49 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Today at 05:36:10 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal