collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee  (Read 1733 times)

Offline denali

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 2212
  • Location: Tri Cities
    • https://www.facebook.com/bret.greene
Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee
« on: July 16, 2014, 09:21:45 PM »
http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/wildlife_weekly/        June 30th   page 2    full text

Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee

 it is imperative that efforts to develop a grizzly bear EIS
and the implementation of any recovery actions not fail due to public concerns
over other large carnivore management in the state, nor that they negatively impact our wolf
recovery program
. In addition, WDFW’s ability to engage will require financial  assistance from NPS




so if I can sum this up, We LOVE wolves but they are a lot of trouble.  Grizzly bears will be even more work,,,,, send us money   :chuckle:
Honesty is the best policy,  but insanity is a better defense.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2014, 04:35:36 AM »
Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee Meeting: Division Manager Eric Gardner attended an
Interagency Grizzly Bear Meeting (IGBC) in the North Cascades. During the meeting, the
National Park Service (NPS) stated that they hope to be able to make a formal announcement
soon regarding potential plans to develop an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluating
recovery options for grizzly bears in the North Cascades
. WDFW expressed a desire to
participate in the process while at the same time communicated 3 specific challenges that will
need to be addressed. One of the issues has to do with a state statute that provides a legal
framework under which WDFW is obligated to work. RCW 77.12.035 Protection of grizzly
bears -- Limitation on transplantation or introduction -- Negotiations with federal and state
agencies (see below) sets some expectations for State involvement and also speaks to the need to
manage using only bears native to Washington. Secondly, it is imperative that efforts to develop
a grizzly bear EIS and the implementation of any recovery actions not fail due to public concerns
over other large carnivore management in the state, nor that they negatively impact our wolf
recovery program
. In addition, WDFW’s ability to engage will require financial assistance from
the NPS to allow for staff participation in the process, which is expected to take at least 3 years
to complete if initiated.

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4146
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2014, 10:40:40 AM »
If these fires don't get under some kind of control,  NO habitat left, NO need for no stinking Grizzly's! :twocents:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44754
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2014, 11:06:52 AM »
They're seriously worried the wolves will be negatively impacted by grizzlies? And, these people are managing our wildlife. God, they haven't a clue! :bash:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by lewy
[Today at 12:21:04 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 12:12:47 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by elkoholic1
[Today at 12:09:52 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Today at 11:27:32 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Ajmani84
[Today at 11:22:47 AM]


Athlon Rangecraft Chrono by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 11:09:00 AM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by BA Mongor
[Today at 11:07:13 AM]


June 26-27th WDFW Commission Meeting. Showing of sportsmen needed for Friday. by Docspud
[Today at 09:27:00 AM]


Tease 'l' by Ricochet
[Today at 08:40:05 AM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by mpeschon21
[Today at 08:38:04 AM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by salish
[Today at 08:23:32 AM]


Pocket Carry by Macs B
[Today at 07:39:26 AM]


38% increase in fishing and hunting licenses by mikey549
[Today at 06:07:39 AM]


E scouting for bears by bear
[Today at 05:55:13 AM]


Herring anyone? by CastleRocker
[Yesterday at 09:42:53 PM]


Leupold Display fade by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:17:29 PM]


Minimum post count needed to view classifieds by Hucci
[Yesterday at 06:43:35 PM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:12:07 PM]


Encouraging on e side by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:54:51 PM]


506 Willapa Hills Late Season Antlerless Tag by Fast Rider
[Yesterday at 12:48:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal