collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699  (Read 1284 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« on: August 07, 2014, 10:38:06 PM »
Earlier this year I posted how WDFW is proposing some type of hoof-rot related regulations for hunters. The regulation has been drafted and tomorrow the Fish and Wildlife Commission will vote on the regulation. The regulation states:

WAC 232-12-286 Reducing the spread of hoof disease—Unlawful transport of elk hooves.
(1) It is unlawful to transport the hooves of harvested elk beyond the site where the animal was killed in Game Man-agement Units 501 through 564, and 642 through 699.
(2) Violation of this section is an infraction under RCW 77.15.160, Infractions.

The WA Supreme Court decides what the actually monetary fine is. Under this WAC the offense would be charged under RCW 77.15.160(5)(b) which the Supreme Court said carries a $150 fine.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2014, 10:47:39 PM »
Seems like a good idea and definitely not a difficult rule for hunters to follow.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38814
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2014, 10:56:24 PM »
 :yeah:  agreed, might be a good idea to bury them also...
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Re: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2014, 11:18:31 PM »
Kind of interesting the wide span of units this covers. Basically all of Grays Harbor county, a portion of Mason, all of Pierce, and even a portion of King (the White River GMU), and of course everything in the SW with the exception of Southern Skamania County.

This land description may mean something in terms of where WDFW thinks hoof rot may end up  :dunno:

Offline gonehuntin68

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 906
  • Location: wetside
Re: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2014, 09:12:17 AM »
Good Idea.  :tup:

Offline Old Man Yager

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 2046
  • Location: Puyallup, WA. USA
  • Groups: NRA, PRHAA
Re: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2014, 09:19:04 AM »
Why pack them out anyway? just extra weight!
My Dad always said, " Get a bigger hammer "

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45221
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Proposed Hoof Rot Regulation GMUs 501-564 & 642-699
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2014, 07:20:13 AM »
This should give people a good idea of how widespread the problem is.  :bash:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Re gearing the hunting rig by colersu22
[Today at 04:43:26 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Berin Denson
[Today at 04:03:34 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Feathernfurr
[Today at 03:53:07 PM]


Dehydrating Chantrelles by MR5x5
[Today at 03:46:57 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by redi
[Today at 02:37:23 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by elkaholic123
[Today at 01:34:10 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by Shooter4
[Today at 01:23:15 PM]


Quality tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:02:57 PM]


2025 opener by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:57:00 AM]


Talking About Barely Legal by lewy
[Today at 10:00:55 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 09:06:30 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 07:42:22 PM]


Japanese Kei truck? by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 06:06:01 PM]


CCW/SA small Supreme Court win+breaking down the WWF "Not my WDFW" Campaign by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 05:42:36 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 05:30:31 PM]


Nile bull hunters by lee
[Yesterday at 04:31:32 PM]


Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:07:26 PM]


Bear Snare? by danderson
[Yesterday at 01:42:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal