Free: Contests & Raffles.
Just got mine today and voted no on 594 and yes on 591
I don't get it. 591 protects our rights.
"You voted no on 591? That didn't add any regulations, just prohibited future regulations"What I have read, what I have been emailed from others is that is sounds all well and good, BUT if the Feds decide to make more taxing laws, the STATE will have to ignore THEIR Constitution and ENFORCE the stricter laws.Have you been told otherwise??"unless a uniform national standard is required" I 591??? Pg 17 of the WA voter pamphlet.It "prohibits" NOTHING. We all know what a "standard" the left wants!!!
Quote from: pianoman9701 on October 22, 2014, 01:25:37 PMI don't get it. 591 protects our rights.He probably didn't read it
"You voted no on 591? That didn't add any regulations, just prohibited future regulations"What I have read, what I have been emailed from others is that is sounds all well and good, BUT if the Feds decide to make more taxing laws, the STATE will have to ignore THEIR Constitution and ENFORCE the stricter laws.Have you been told otherwise??"unless a uniform national standard is required" I 591??? Pg 17 of the WA voter pamphlet.It "prohibits" NOTHING. I too strugled with the language on unless theres a national standard. Which very much could mean that if a national standard is set that were all to undergo backgroundchecks even for private sales then ye were screwed. But I think it would have been far more prudent to have voted yes to 591. At least you got half of it right at least 594 will have an extra no vote!We all know what a "standard" the left wants!!! I haven't mailed my in yet, Convince me otherwise on 591
Quote from: Knocker of rocks on October 22, 2014, 01:30:06 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on October 22, 2014, 01:25:37 PMI don't get it. 591 protects our rights.He probably didn't read itSo you guys are ok if we have the morons in DC imposing universal background checks but aren't ok with it if the morons in Seattle impose it? 591 does nothing more than kicking the ball into the court of the U.S. Congress to impose the same thing later on.
I've seen the light!! Thanks All!! I've changed my vote to yes, better get a little while we can!!! The Democrats and RINO'S will keep the pressure on to become a Socialist nation until AMERICA wakes up I have my doughts since so many GUN owners cast votes for Democrats ARE you that ignorant??
Got the above, thats a no brainer, what about all the people, somewhere I seen a list of who was the best to vote for, for our interests.. anyone have that link?
Quote from: hughjorgan on October 22, 2014, 07:38:18 PMQuote from: Knocker of rocks on October 22, 2014, 01:30:06 PMQuote from: pianoman9701 on October 22, 2014, 01:25:37 PMI don't get it. 591 protects our rights.He probably didn't read itSo you guys are ok if we have the morons in DC imposing universal background checks but aren't ok with it if the morons in Seattle impose it? 591 does nothing more than kicking the ball into the court of the U.S. Congress to impose the same thing later on.Not sure where the confusion is on this. Don't over-analyze this issue.I-594 is ANTI-GUN to its core; we all know this. VOTE NO on I-594 (The ANTI-GUN Initiative)If I-594 passes and I-591 does not, we are screwed; we lose rights, freedoms, and liberties; law-abiding citizens can easily become felons due to I-594 (The ANTI-GUN Initiative). I-591 must pass in order to counter I-594 if I-594 passes; that is why I-591 is there.If I-594 fails and I-591 passes, there is no harm done, no loss of our rights, no loss of freedoms, and no loss of liberties.If anyone would like to add to this comment, feel free.