collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Barnes LRX performance  (Read 45213 times)

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #60 on: December 30, 2014, 03:29:39 PM »
Good read Bob33. And considering American game is the same size as African game, other then shouldered farther back on some African game, will hold true here in the states..

However, what was your average shooting distance in Africa? 

Shortest was 150 on a Kudu, longest was 475 on a blue wildebeest. At 308 velocities, bullets performed flawlessly! Yes, other bullets would have done the same, but in my XCR, the Barnes was a quarter minute round  :) Yes, say" Barnes", and some bust a corpusle, and expound their vendetta for whatever reason,  but real world experience don't lie... :). To the OP, you can have every faith in your bullet, as long as it shoots accuratley in your gun! :tup:

Wow!  Never before heard of shooting those distances in Africa.  That is very interesting.  What outfit did you book with?

308 Norma, maybe :chuckle:
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #61 on: December 30, 2014, 04:28:07 PM »
Why is it that when a barnes fails to expand somehow its better than any other bullet that fails to expand? To me all my bullet needs to do is reach vital organs and then blow up like a grenade....i have no need to shoot a mule deer and kill the tree behind it too...i have always been confused why weight retention after entering the chest cavity is so important? Whats so wrong with penetration and massive seperation after its penetrated...unless i wanna shoot an animal in the shoulders and ruin all the meat i see no need for a solid copper bullet designed to penetrate that deep

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21794
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #62 on: December 30, 2014, 04:35:47 PM »
An exit hole creates another opportunity for a blood trail.  In open terrain that is meaningless but in brushy conditions it can aid in animal tracking.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #63 on: December 30, 2014, 05:00:46 PM »
Just like in archery...  Some pay little attention to terminal ballistics and rely on lots of penetration so they can have a better blood trail. While others prefer sharp heads and small vents so they can watch the animal go down.  Both seem to work.  But MY way is always better than yours! :chuckle: :chuckle:


I think that is why the Nosler Partition has remain so popular for so many years.  It may be a flying brick in comparison to long range bullets of today, but it has always been the bullet of maximum compromise to many.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2014, 07:02:36 PM by RadSav »
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #64 on: December 30, 2014, 05:40:15 PM »
Before everything went crazy BC and bonded core wise the Partition was the bullet all were judged by and the Speer Hotcore was a real "Sleeper". :tup:

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #65 on: December 30, 2014, 06:41:06 PM »
An exit hole creates another opportunity for a blood trail.  In open terrain that is meaningless but in brushy conditions it can aid in animal tracking.
hmmm....valid point...but a bullet that does massive internal damage in an animal will probly not need tracked...i guess we can agree to disagree on bullets...lol

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21794
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #66 on: December 30, 2014, 07:03:01 PM »
An exit hole creates another opportunity for a blood trail.  In open terrain that is meaningless but in brushy conditions it can aid in animal tracking.
hmmm....valid point...but a bullet that does massive internal damage in an animal will probly not need tracked...i guess we can agree to disagree on bullets...lol
Ive lost animals in Western Washington that went 20 yards (found the next day). BTW I have nothing against Accubonds and have used them with good success.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #67 on: December 30, 2014, 09:13:48 PM »
I have nothing against Barnes , other than some peoples reasoning for using them or their not understanding what velocities it takes to expand them. I will never use them, my idea of terminal performance and expirience with terminal performance. Isn't even on the same page as Barnes. Is Barnes the "End all" to all bullets? Many who shoot them claim they are, along with guys shooting them that have never even killed a big game animal. Is the Accubond the "End all" to all bullets?

Not for me , I like them but depending on what and where I hunt. I've been know to slum bullets effectivly that most Barnes shooters would turn their nose up to. I think the confusion comes when people try to chooose a bullet to do it all. That just isn't going to happen.

Accubonds do it all "Good" but aren't the "Best" at anything particular and that has worked for me. Besides I've been a die hard Nosler bullet guy forever and that's where my loyalties are. Just another great bullet from a great bullet maker. There was a long period of years there that no matter where I was, or what I was hunting. A Remington 700 BDL with a box mag full of 175gr Partitions covered it all. It was so much simpler then. I guess it's what we make it.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3498
  • Location: west coast
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #68 on: December 30, 2014, 09:23:25 PM »
It was so much simpler then. I guess it's what we make it.

 Agreed  :tup:

Offline 257 Wby Mag

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1975
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #69 on: December 31, 2014, 02:52:07 PM »
A guy would think some folks were huntin rhinos or somthing!!  I been fortunate enough to kill lotsa critters, even "tough" Africa game, a huge bull oryx that took a hornady interlock raked through his flank quartering away at 417 yards, one and done... Growing up hunting blacktails the ol man always taught us to shoulder shoot, which works well.. 55 grain bt's via 243 @ 4000 fps is pure magic on bucks, shoulder shots of course.. I think some folks would be better off hunting/killing critters than reading magazines and internet experts...
Tod Riechert fan club.

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6071
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #70 on: December 31, 2014, 05:53:46 PM »
^^^Agree^^^  :chuckle: :chuckle:
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline thinkingman

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #71 on: January 01, 2015, 10:57:46 AM »
375 Ultra Mag for deer?

Yeah, figured it was better suited to Mulies and gave me more range than the .450 Ultra Magnum. :o . For the ease of a factory chambering and a true flat shooting across the board power house, the  .338 Ultra mag is where it's at.



30mm depleted uranium on cous deer.
88mm on elk, for sure.
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6071
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #72 on: January 01, 2015, 01:02:11 PM »
No such thing as overkill I guess!
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #73 on: January 01, 2015, 01:09:11 PM »
375 Ultra Mag for deer?

Yeah, figured it was better suited to Mulies and gave me more range than the .450 Ultra Magnum. :o . For the ease of a factory chambering and a true flat shooting across the board power house, the  .338 Ultra mag is where it's at.



30mm depleted uranium on cous deer.
88mm on elk, for sure.

You wouldn't happen to have some depleted Uranium?  :o If so, how much can you fit in a flat rate USPS "Small" box? :tup:

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50552
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Barnes LRX performance
« Reply #74 on: January 01, 2015, 01:11:00 PM »

Do animals ever not drop in their tracks/footprints?


Only with crappy bullets fired from non-tackdrivers.
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Need a meat processor and taxidermist around gmu 113 by teanawayslayer
[Today at 02:03:19 PM]


WHAT DID YOUR TRUCK COST NEW? by Dan-o
[Today at 02:02:24 PM]


Saturday double on black bears by Dan-o
[Today at 02:01:14 PM]


Now Licensed in Idaho, Washington, and Oregon by pianoman9701
[Today at 01:37:15 PM]


CWD according to Uncle Ted by hughjorgan
[Today at 01:18:27 PM]


Pinks! by bigtex
[Today at 01:06:39 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Kdog
[Today at 01:06:05 PM]


One day and a wake-up by Bearhunter308
[Today at 12:14:42 PM]


Hawke creek in November? by syoungs
[Today at 12:11:21 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by TeacherMan
[Today at 11:22:52 AM]


CWD testing in ALL 100 series GMU's is now mandatory by Ridgeratt
[Today at 10:46:58 AM]


Idaho Elk and Deer Hunters by Machias
[Today at 09:28:30 AM]


Nooksack Muzzleloader Bull Tag by freezerfull
[Today at 09:25:37 AM]


Bear in 568 by cking96000
[Today at 08:13:09 AM]


GMU 1[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390][emoji[emoji2390]391]9[emoji2390]] closed for cougar by hunter100
[Today at 06:48:15 AM]


MA-10 Coho by BLH69
[Today at 05:15:33 AM]


Berry Report? by birdshooter1189
[Yesterday at 09:44:23 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 09:33:01 PM]


Help!! Blew out my boots. by Remnar
[Yesterday at 08:34:42 PM]


MOVED: Free Motorcyle trailer by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 05:56:03 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal