Free: Contests & Raffles.
Money hungry landowners ? Maybe they are landowners sustaining damages to their crops and finding a way to make up for financial loss. Not to mention the time taken out of their daily lives to answer phone call after phone call of people asking permission. I hear it gets overwhelming. Why do private land elk need to be managed to the point of trying to produce 350+ class Bulls. Seems wdfw and the big hunting clubs, timber companies only ones making a return. I would just as soon see all the elk stay on public land and keep it fair for everyone.
Quote from: TheHunt on October 08, 2015, 12:11:40 PMJust to muddy the waters...Hancock get something like 8 elk tags to hunt their property which the executives get. That is a general season 3 point or better unit. Why would they need a permit from the state?Sent from my E6782 using Tapatalk
Just to muddy the waters...Hancock get something like 8 elk tags to hunt their property which the executives get.
Quote from: grundy53 on October 08, 2015, 07:36:00 PMQuote from: TheHunt on October 08, 2015, 12:11:40 PMJust to muddy the waters...Hancock get something like 8 elk tags to hunt their property which the executives get. That is a general season 3 point or better unit. Why would they need a permit from the state?Sent from my E6782 using TapatalkHe is talking about the Kapowsin tree farm, and it has not been open to general elk for a very long time. Permit holders are put into a lotto, and a few are chosen every year to hunt elk in there.
You are correct Grundy.
I just saw a sign that's going to be posted in The Blues........
I don't fault the landowners at all for taking advantage of this opportunity and negotiating the best deal for themselves that they can. I do have a real problem with an already limited availability of permits for the average hunter. It literally took me 20 years to draw a muzzle-loader bull permit in the Blues, but if I'd had the money, I could have purchased "access" to one of the limited landowner permits available to the 4-0 Cattle Company or now Bennett Lumber. These are certainly NOT available to the average hunter.I also have a huge problem with the arbitrary way these LHP's are selected and administered. Other landowners in the same areas that have always been open to public access are given NO consideration by WDFW when allotting these programs. Their only thanks for being open to the general public is a sound slap in the face when they see their neighbors being handed these lucrative permits in order to open their own properties to limited access. If these programs are to exist, they need to be handled equitably to all and not just a few select individuals who make the most noise or happen to have a nice piece of ground that WDFW is interested in purchasing down the road. I would prefer instead that the whole program be scrapped with a return to the days of actually fostering good landowner relations without feeling the need to bribe them with quality permits for sale......oh excuse me, access to the land for sale. Just my 2 cents worth from a guy that knows a lot of the history of these programs. If I were an adjacent landowner in this area, my land would be locked up tight and posted to demonstrate the down-side to selling the State's resources to the highest bidder. Why would I keep my land open for free if I can get my own "piece of the pie" like the others.
Quote from: jimbow on October 08, 2015, 05:56:24 PMI don't fault the landowners at all for taking advantage of this opportunity and negotiating the best deal for themselves that they can. I do have a real problem with an already limited availability of permits for the average hunter. It literally took me 20 years to draw a muzzle-loader bull permit in the Blues, but if I'd had the money, I could have purchased "access" to one of the limited landowner permits available to the 4-0 Cattle Company or now Bennett Lumber. These are certainly NOT available to the average hunter.I also have a huge problem with the arbitrary way these LHP's are selected and administered. Other landowners in the same areas that have always been open to public access are given NO consideration by WDFW when allotting these programs. Their only thanks for being open to the general public is a sound slap in the face when they see their neighbors being handed these lucrative permits in order to open their own properties to limited access. If these programs are to exist, they need to be handled equitably to all and not just a few select individuals who make the most noise or happen to have a nice piece of ground that WDFW is interested in purchasing down the road. I would prefer instead that the whole program be scrapped with a return to the days of actually fostering good landowner relations without feeling the need to bribe them with quality permits for sale......oh excuse me, access to the land for sale. Just my 2 cents worth from a guy that knows a lot of the history of these programs. If I were an adjacent landowner in this area, my land would be locked up tight and posted to demonstrate the down-side to selling the State's resources to the highest bidder. Why would I keep my land open for free if I can get my own "piece of the pie" like the others.Some of the other landowners have responded. Looking pretty bleak down there. Pay to play is here to stay in WA.
Quote from: huntnphool on October 13, 2015, 07:47:37 AM I just saw a sign that's going to be posted in The Blues........ Care to share?