collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Long Range Accubond Review  (Read 16937 times)

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #30 on: December 29, 2015, 01:44:59 PM »
Ok, that's what I was curious about is the velocity required for the LRAB. At what range does your load drop below 1300fps?
  I'm right at carps numbers.   I hit the 1300 mark right around 1150 yards @ my shooting spot here at home.  Change elevation and temp and that number also changes. 
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #31 on: December 29, 2015, 01:48:04 PM »
I shoot the 95gn VLD's out of my .243 and killed alot of coyotes at various ranges. My sisters and nephew have killed multiple deer with them as well. I can honestly say the VLD's do act funky at close range. I have shot coyotes at 150 yards or so with no exits but also had others at the same range with baseball sized exits. Deer wise my sister killed a buck at 520 yards (perfect heart shot) that the bullet had fragments that almost exited the offside shoulder. I killed my spring bear with the same load at just under 300 (if I remember right) and had an exit on the 1st shot and followed up on a quartered too shot that bang flopped it. (No exit)
All that being said, the consistency of the Bergers are 2nd to none. I just purchased a Sendero in 7mag and have 168gn VLD's on the way. This will be my bear gun ONLY so my plan is to load some Accubonds or Barnes to keep on hand for that one time the bear shows up under 200 or so.  Donno guess I will see.
I played with the 105gr in my .243 this fall and have been very pleased so far.  I actually got an exit on my montana buck which suprized me.  Internal damage was epic!  Those things dump everything they've got inside that body cavity.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Mxracer532

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 572
  • Location: Kennewick
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #32 on: December 29, 2015, 01:59:35 PM »
I shoot the 95gn VLD's out of my .243 and killed alot of coyotes at various ranges. My sisters and nephew have killed multiple deer with them as well. I can honestly say the VLD's do act funky at close range. I have shot coyotes at 150 yards or so with no exits but also had others at the same range with baseball sized exits. Deer wise my sister killed a buck at 520 yards (perfect heart shot) that the bullet had fragments that almost exited the offside shoulder. I killed my spring bear with the same load at just under 300 (if I remember right) and had an exit on the 1st shot and followed up on a quartered too shot that bang flopped it. (No exit)
All that being said, the consistency of the Bergers are 2nd to none. I just purchased a Sendero in 7mag and have 168gn VLD's on the way. This will be my bear gun ONLY so my plan is to load some Accubonds or Barnes to keep on hand for that one time the bear shows up under 200 or so.  Donno guess I will see.
I played with the 105gr in my .243 this fall and have been very pleased so far.  I actually got an exit on my montana buck which suprized me.  Internal damage was epic!  Those things dump everything they've got inside that body cavity.
What yardage was your buck? Twist rate of your rifle? My sisters deer last year she shot at 420 and it had an exit. They absolutely do serious internal damage.
Avid ARCHERY deer and elk hunter.
Coyote killer in the off season.
MX Racer simi retired to practice when I can.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #33 on: December 29, 2015, 02:07:51 PM »
500.  It's a 9 twist which is a bit slow for that big 105 Grainer so I had to push them pretty darn hard to get good stabilization but they shoot well.  I just needed them out of the land and stuffed to the gills with powder and it shot good. :chuckle:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline rtspring

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 5604
  • Location: Hermiston Oregon
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #34 on: December 29, 2015, 02:14:34 PM »
All this to kill a little ol deer!!!   I just road hunt :chuckle:

Very good info karl, interesting read
I kill elk and eat elk, when I'm not, I'm thinking about killing elk and eating elk.

It doesn't matter what you think...

The Whiners suck!!

Offline shootem

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 636
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #35 on: December 29, 2015, 02:19:53 PM »
Ok, that's what I was curious about is the velocity required for the LRAB. At what range does your load drop below 1300fps?
  I'm right at carps numbers.   I hit the 1300 mark right around 1150 yards @ my shooting spot here at home.  Change elevation and temp and that number also changes.

Based on these numbers I will see how they shoot in my gun. The LRABs sure look like they extend the killing range.

Offline Mxracer532

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 572
  • Location: Kennewick
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #36 on: December 29, 2015, 02:28:26 PM »
500.  It's a 9 twist which is a bit slow for that big 105 Grainer so I had to push them pretty darn hard to get good stabilization but they shoot well.  I just needed them out of the land and stuffed to the gills with powder and it shot good. :chuckle:
Mine is a factory heavy barrel Rem 1.9.25 but has a custom chamber job and it shoots the 95's extremely well. Never tried the 105's. The 95's are at 3136fps.
I'm assuming you mean you had to get them seated into the lands?
Avid ARCHERY deer and elk hunter.
Coyote killer in the off season.
MX Racer simi retired to practice when I can.

Offline 2labs

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 2299
  • Location: Graham
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #37 on: December 29, 2015, 02:32:44 PM »
Who's tried the new 6.5 142 gr..... Look kinda gooood?
Dino was robbed
Habitual Rock Poacher
Do these "attack" pants make my ass look big?

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3489
  • Location: west coast
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #38 on: December 29, 2015, 02:41:18 PM »
I think we're in the upper 20s in kills (mostly elk)with the vlds at all ranges and for the most part we've been happy but it's just that 1% chance of having nothing make it to the lungs that concerns me....

I think I'm going to the hornady and my brothers going with the accubond....hopefully we'l keep killing stuff and be able get a good opinion on which is better for us

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39189
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #39 on: December 29, 2015, 02:43:29 PM »
If your actual BCs are well below the advertised BCs, it could be that your twist is too slow. If the bullets are properly stabilized you should get the listed BCs or even slightly higher according to the research I did a couple years ago. I ended up going with the Bergers because of all the negative reviews I read of the LRAB's performance on closer shots.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #40 on: December 29, 2015, 02:50:45 PM »
B.C.'s are never static.  It's up to the shooter to figure out the correct numbers. 
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #41 on: December 29, 2015, 02:52:11 PM »
500.  It's a 9 twist which is a bit slow for that big 105 Grainer so I had to push them pretty darn hard to get good stabilization but they shoot well.  I just needed them out of the land and stuffed to the gills with powder and it shot good. :chuckle:
Mine is a factory heavy barrel Rem 1.9.25 but has a custom chamber job and it shoots the 95's extremely well. Never tried the 105's. The 95's are at 3136fps.
I'm assuming you mean you had to get them seated into the lands?
haha.  Ya talk to text doesn't always work like you'd like it. :chuckle:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #42 on: December 29, 2015, 02:54:56 PM »
Most reviews I read, guys were averaging about 10% lower BC than printed numbers.  Pretty standard for Nosler actually.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39189
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #43 on: December 29, 2015, 03:12:21 PM »
This is the info I was going by:

http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/f19/nosler-lr-accubonds-bc-testing-results-137554/

Quote
As you can see, the actual BC's can be quite close; within 1-8% of advertised if they're properly stabilized. If they're not properly stabilized (which you might not know according to groups), the BC can be 10-12% lower than advertised.

The LR AB's are well designed (low drag) bullets. One reality of long/low drag bullets is they typically require faster than conventional twist rates to stabilize. However Nosler doesn't provide recommended 'specialty' twist rates for these bullets (at least not that I could find) so users are left to assume that standard twist rates will work.



For example, the .270 caliber 150 grain LRAB fired from a 1:10" twist 270 Winchester only produced an SG (stability factor) of 1.19 under the conditions of the test. This low stability resulted in a G7 BC of 0.278, which is 12% below the advertised value of .317. Note that groups were good at this stability level. However, in order to achieve the highest BC, you need to generate a stability factor of at least 1.5*. Retesting the bullet in a 1:7" twist 270 Winchester produced an SG of 2.31, and a BC that's 4% higher (0.291).

It's the same story with the 7mm 168 grain. Fired from a 'standard' 1:9" twist 7mm Remington Magnum, the stability factor was 1.33, and the BC was 10% less than advertised. Same bullet fired from a 1:7" twist .284 Winchester produced an SG of 2.19, and a BC that's 4% higher, and within 6% of the advertised BC.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10642
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Long Range Accubond Review
« Reply #44 on: December 29, 2015, 03:17:04 PM »
Well mine are adequately stable but thanks for the link
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

49 degrees north late Moose tag by vandeman17
[Today at 09:05:21 AM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by jason stevens
[Today at 09:05:09 AM]


Bear behavior by dylan34_36
[Today at 08:51:28 AM]


Idaho Unit 31 Late Rifle! by Sliverslinger
[Today at 08:36:10 AM]


Getting back into dogs by brokentrail
[Today at 08:33:12 AM]


Bow mount trolling motors by GWP
[Today at 08:25:59 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by Machias
[Today at 08:12:17 AM]


Machias' 2025 Spring Bear/Northern Idaho by Machias
[Today at 07:52:44 AM]


Norway pass Elk by hunterednate
[Today at 07:44:13 AM]


Early controlled hunt rifle tag Lemhi Range by Shooter4
[Today at 07:29:56 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by Sneaky
[Today at 05:43:56 AM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by RB
[Today at 03:13:07 AM]


Boat registration by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:22:29 PM]


Norway Pass Archery Elk 2025 by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:14:45 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 09:05:06 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by dr.derek
[Yesterday at 08:29:53 PM]


Pearygin Quality by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:55:09 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Caveman123
[Yesterday at 07:43:44 PM]


Oregon results posted. by Caveman123
[Yesterday at 07:40:47 PM]


2025 Draw Results by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 07:27:32 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal