Free: Contests & Raffles.
No argument that a 3” or a 2 ¾” or even a 2 ½” shell will kill a turkey. But if you want to squeeze the most effective pattern out of your gun your shell length should be the same as your chamber length. That’s why you won’t find any 3” or 3 ½” chambers on competitive trap or skeet guns. Do you need the most effective pattern to kill a turkey, no you don’t, but it doesn’t hurt either.
Quote from: CP on February 01, 2016, 02:54:38 PMNo argument that a 3” or a 2 ¾” or even a 2 ½” shell will kill a turkey. But if you want to squeeze the most effective pattern out of your gun your shell length should be the same as your chamber length. That’s why you won’t find any 3” or 3 ½” chambers on competitive trap or skeet guns. Do you need the most effective pattern to kill a turkey, no you don’t, but it doesn’t hurt either.Agreed. I should clarify my statement to include that the birds killed with 3 inch shells have been shot from a gun chambered for 3 inch, and the birds killed with 3 1/2 inch shells have been shot from a gun chambered for 3 1/2 inch.
3" or even 2 3/4", I see no reason to shoot the more expensive, higher recoiling rounds, but I'm not trying to take turkeys at 45+ yards either.
Trying to figure out what new gun to buy. One only shoots up to 3" shells and one will shoot up to 3 1/2" shells. So I can't check patterns yet. Most likely stick with 3" unless there is a huge difference in the 3 1/2 if I choose the Remington. Remington Versa max - up to 3 1/2"Benelli M2 field gun - up to 3"
What do you like for Turkey? 3" or 3 1/2". and why?
I don't turkey hunt but federal did a study of 3.5 and they basically have 50% more recoil with negligible ballistic benefits. Food for thought
3 1/2 because I can.