Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
Advertisement
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal (Read 16419 times)
Antlershed
Trade Count:
(
+8
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4822
Location: Olympia, WA
Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
on:
February 12, 2016, 10:24:44 AM »
Just got the email to provide comments on the 2016-17 Hunting Regulation proposals. Looks like they are going after bait again for deer/elk hunting with a few different options.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/regulations/hunting_regulations/
Logged
Advertise Here
Wacenturion
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
-1
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6040
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #1 on:
February 12, 2016, 11:01:01 AM »
NEW SECTIONWAC 232-12-239 Baiting for the purposes of hunting deer or elk. (1) For the purposes of this section:(a) "Bait" is any salt, grain, fruit, hay or other food-based attractant that could serve as a lure or attraction for deer or elk.(b) Scent attractants and scent covers are not considered bait.(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is unlawful to hunt deer or elk using any type of bait placed, exposed, deposited, distributed, scattered, or otherwise used for the purpose of attracting deer or elk to an area where one or more persons intend to hunt them.(3) Exceptions: Hunting on or over the following is not considered an unlawful use of bait while hunting deer or elk:(a) Farms or ranches where active agricultural operations including salt or mineral distribution for livestock, crop fields, orchards, vineyards, hay fields, haystacks, or pastures exist;(b) Abandoned orchards or vineyards;(c) Naturally occurring mineral deposits; or(d) Food plots planted for wildlife and left undisturbed.(4) A violation of this section is punishable as an infraction under RCW 77.15.160 if no animal has been shot or killed and RCW 77.15.410 Unlawful hunting of big game—Penalty, if an animal has been shot or killed.
Logged
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."
Wacenturion
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
-1
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6040
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #2 on:
February 12, 2016, 11:03:47 AM »
NEW SECTIONWAC 232-12-245 Baiting for the purposes of hunting deer or elk. (1) For the purposes of this section: "Bait" is any substance that could serve as a lure, food, or attraction for deer or elk.(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is unlawful to hunt for deer and elk using any type of bait placed, exposed, deposited, distributed, scattered, or otherwise used for the purpose of attracting deer or elk to an area where one or more persons intend to hunt them, if the volume of bait exceeds 10 gallons.(3) Bait sites cannot be placed within 200 yards from another bait site.(4) Exceptions: Hunting on or over the following is not considered an unlawful use of bait while hunting deer or elk:(a) Locally common agricultural and ranching practices including salt or mineral distribution, and feeding;(b) Food that is available from undisturbed wild, volunteer, or planted vegetation; including fruit trees, orchards, vineyards, and food plots;(c) Scents used for cover and attractant that are not consumed by animals;(d) Naturally occurring mineral deposits; or(e) Exceptions do not include accidental or intentional spills, dumping, or storage of agricultural produce, feed, or bait.(5) A violation of this section is punishable as an infraction under RCW 77.15.160 if no animal has been shot or killed and RCW 77.15.410 Unlawful hunting of big game—Penalty, if an animal has been shot or killed.
Logged
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."
Wacenturion
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
-1
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6040
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #3 on:
February 12, 2016, 11:10:07 AM »
" if the volume of bait exceeds 10 gallons."
Wonder how that applies to a 30 gallon hanging automatic feeder. Is it the amount on the ground, or in the feeder itself?
Logged
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."
bobcat
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+14
)
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 39202
Location: Rochester
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #4 on:
February 12, 2016, 11:15:10 AM »
I would think that it would mean the amount of bait that's actually on the ground.
Logged
mp.hunter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 595
Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #5 on:
February 12, 2016, 11:25:01 AM »
Looks like they got rid of all the late Teanaway elk bull tags, and reduced many others as well, I don't get it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged
jstone
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6570
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #6 on:
February 12, 2016, 12:15:15 PM »
Look who came out of his Cave.. mp.hunter its almost spring
Hello. any way to get back on track, I dont think i will ever get there thinking. LOTS a cow permits but NOT many Bull permits??
Logged
bobcat
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+14
)
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 39202
Location: Rochester
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #7 on:
February 12, 2016, 12:50:55 PM »
I wonder how many bull elk are taken out of Teanaway by tribal members each year? Could that be why they are reducing the number of permits?
Logged
X-Force
Solo Hunter
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+8
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5572
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #8 on:
February 12, 2016, 12:54:02 PM »
Teanaway also has had wolves in there for a while.
Logged
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.
Bango skank
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+9
)
Old Salt
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5880
Location: colville
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #9 on:
February 12, 2016, 12:55:57 PM »
Got my hopes up when i saw proposed cougar changes. Was expecting a doubled quota. Nope.
Logged
mp.hunter
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 595
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #10 on:
February 12, 2016, 12:56:25 PM »
There are plenty of bulls in there to at least give a few tags out, it will just ship all those bull guys over to other categories to make it that much harder to draw anything, and yes Jstone, hibernation is over, lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged
Bango skank
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+9
)
Old Salt
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 5880
Location: colville
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #11 on:
February 12, 2016, 01:43:29 PM »
Im also pretty disappointed that theyre not proposing getting rid of all the excessive antlerless opportunity for whitetails. Maybe even bring the 4pt apr back. Wake up and smell the blue tongue.
Logged
wheels
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1458
Location: pacific washington
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #12 on:
February 12, 2016, 02:05:57 PM »
changing restrictions on disabled bighorn tags immature ram 1/2 curl or less no good
Logged
X-Force
Solo Hunter
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+8
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5572
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #13 on:
February 12, 2016, 02:31:48 PM »
Hopefully limiting baiting falls flat on its face.
Logged
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.
jstone
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6570
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
«
Reply #14 on:
February 12, 2016, 03:10:24 PM »
I also told them to keep the four wheelers out of where they shouldnt be!!
Logged
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
DR Clips and Braided Mainline
by
Happy Gilmore
[
Yesterday
at 11:58:04 PM]
Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System
by
dvolmer
[
Yesterday
at 10:11:48 PM]
Pork belly street tacos…..
by
high_hunter
[
Yesterday
at 09:32:33 PM]
One of the lucky ones- 108 Douglas Bull Moose
by
Bryantmaupin
[
Yesterday
at 09:22:23 PM]
North Idaho Houndsmen Association Field Trial
by
Machias
[
Yesterday
at 09:11:13 PM]
2024 deer just got home
by
greenhead_killer
[
Yesterday
at 08:54:49 PM]
Gots me a new/old rockchuck rifle coming
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Yesterday
at 07:31:59 PM]
Montana general deer
by
furbearer365
[
Yesterday
at 06:29:51 PM]
Big Thank You
by
str8meat
[
Yesterday
at 06:08:55 PM]
More Kings!
by
highside74
[
Yesterday
at 05:40:53 PM]
HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos
by
huntnnw
[
Yesterday
at 05:40:02 PM]
Pogue (233) Deer Tag
by
actionshooter
[
Yesterday
at 05:32:32 PM]
High buck hunt
by
builtfordtough
[
Yesterday
at 05:01:48 PM]
Pinks!
by
C-Money
[
Yesterday
at 02:56:56 PM]
Muzzleloader scope options
by
MADMAX
[
Yesterday
at 02:26:44 PM]
Hoof Rot
by
PsoasHunter
[
Yesterday
at 11:08:08 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal