collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal  (Read 16303 times)

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« on: February 12, 2016, 10:24:44 AM »
Just got the email to provide comments on the 2016-17 Hunting Regulation proposals. Looks like they are going after bait again for deer/elk hunting with a few different options.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/regulations/hunting_regulations/

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2016, 11:01:01 AM »
NEW SECTIONWAC 232-12-239 Baiting for the purposes of hunting deer or elk. (1) For the purposes of this section:(a) "Bait" is any salt, grain, fruit, hay or other food-based attractant that could serve as a lure or attraction for deer or elk.(b) Scent attractants and scent covers are not considered bait.(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is unlawful to hunt deer or elk using any type of bait placed, exposed, deposited, distributed, scattered, or otherwise used for the purpose of attracting deer or elk to an area where one or more persons intend to hunt them.(3) Exceptions: Hunting on or over the following is not considered an unlawful use of bait while hunting deer or elk:(a) Farms or ranches where active agricultural operations including salt or mineral distribution for livestock, crop fields, orchards, vineyards, hay fields, haystacks, or pastures exist;(b) Abandoned orchards or vineyards;(c) Naturally occurring mineral deposits; or(d) Food plots planted for wildlife and left undisturbed.(4) A violation of this section is punishable as an infraction under RCW 77.15.160 if no animal has been shot or killed and RCW 77.15.410 Unlawful hunting of big game—Penalty, if an animal has been shot or killed.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2016, 11:03:47 AM »
NEW SECTIONWAC 232-12-245 Baiting for the purposes of hunting deer or elk. (1) For the purposes of this section: "Bait" is any substance that could serve as a lure, food, or attraction for deer or elk.(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is unlawful to hunt for deer and elk using any type of bait placed, exposed, deposited, distributed, scattered, or otherwise used for the purpose of attracting deer or elk to an area where one or more persons intend to hunt them, if the volume of bait exceeds 10 gallons.(3) Bait sites cannot be placed within 200 yards from another bait site.(4) Exceptions: Hunting on or over the following is not considered an unlawful use of bait while hunting deer or elk:(a) Locally common agricultural and ranching practices including salt or mineral distribution, and feeding;(b) Food that is available from undisturbed wild, volunteer, or planted vegetation; including fruit trees, orchards, vineyards, and food plots;(c) Scents used for cover and attractant that are not consumed by animals;(d) Naturally occurring mineral deposits; or(e) Exceptions do not include accidental or intentional spills, dumping, or storage of agricultural produce, feed, or bait.(5) A violation of this section is punishable as an infraction under RCW 77.15.160 if no animal has been shot or killed and RCW 77.15.410 Unlawful hunting of big game—Penalty, if an animal has been shot or killed.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2016, 11:10:07 AM »
" if the volume of bait exceeds 10 gallons."

Wonder how that applies to a 30 gallon hanging automatic feeder.  Is it the amount on the ground, or in the feeder itself?  :dunno:
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2016, 11:15:10 AM »
I would think that it would mean the amount of bait that's actually on the ground.

Offline mp.hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 595
Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2016, 11:25:01 AM »
Looks like they got rid of all the late Teanaway elk bull tags, and reduced many others as well, I don't get it!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2016, 12:15:15 PM »
Look who came out of his Cave.. mp.hunter its almost spring :chuckle: :chuckle: Hello. any way to get back on track, I dont think i will ever get there thinking. LOTS a cow permits but NOT many Bull permits??

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39202
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2016, 12:50:55 PM »
I wonder how many bull elk are taken out of Teanaway by tribal members each year? Could that be why they are reducing the number of permits?

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5567
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2016, 12:54:02 PM »
Teanaway also has had wolves in there for a while.
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5880
  • Location: colville
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2016, 12:55:57 PM »
Got my hopes up when i saw proposed cougar changes.  Was expecting a doubled quota.  Nope.

Offline mp.hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 595
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2016, 12:56:25 PM »
There are plenty of bulls in there to at least give a few tags out, it will just ship all those bull guys over to other categories to make it that much harder to draw anything, and yes Jstone, hibernation is over, lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5880
  • Location: colville
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2016, 01:43:29 PM »
Im also pretty disappointed that theyre not proposing getting rid of all the excessive antlerless opportunity for whitetails.  Maybe even bring the 4pt apr back.  Wake up and smell the blue tongue.

Offline wheels

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 1458
  • Location: pacific washington
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2016, 02:05:57 PM »
changing restrictions on disabled bighorn tags immature ram 1/2 curl or less  no good

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5567
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2016, 02:31:48 PM »
Hopefully limiting baiting falls flat on its face.
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Comment on 2016-17 Hunting Reg Proposal
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2016, 03:10:24 PM »
I also told them to keep the four wheelers out of where they shouldnt be!!  8) 8)

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal