collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Baiting Restrictions  (Read 36582 times)

Offline jhawk13

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2016
  • Posts: 164
  • Location: vancouver, wa
Baiting Restrictions
« on: April 11, 2016, 06:02:45 PM »
Anyone else see the restrictions they put on baiting this year? Only a matter of time till its banned all together.

I can kinda get the argument for the banning of it within 200 yards of each other, but at the same time you give an inch and then its all banned.

Offline jhawk13

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2016
  • Posts: 164
  • Location: vancouver, wa
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2016, 06:03:51 PM »

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10655
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2016, 06:04:21 PM »
There's about three different threads on this....

Offline jhawk13

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2016
  • Posts: 164
  • Location: vancouver, wa
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2016, 06:09:25 PM »
There's about three different threads on this....

I didn't see anything on the elk part of the forum, I apologize if it has been posted before!

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2016, 06:14:02 PM »
I wouldn't worry about it being banned altogether. This is something that had been studied for a full year before they came up with the proposals, and with an 8-1 vote, the Fish & Wildlife Commission adopted the proposal that will soon become law.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10655
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2016, 06:25:49 PM »
I wouldn't worry about it being banned altogether. This is something that had been studied for a full year before they came up with the proposals, and with an 8-1 vote, the Fish & Wildlife Commission adopted the proposal that will soon become law.
I don't see an outright ban coming from the Commission. However, I wouldn't be shocked if sometime down the line a voter initiative is passed, or maybe even the legislature outlaws it.

The Commission enacts regulations. Initiatives and the legislature enacts laws. Laws override regulations...

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2016, 09:51:25 PM »
Funny how the States many say they will spend their money in have already banned!  Food for thought.

Offline LeviD1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 458
  • Location: Spokane
  • Groups: Evergreen Archery, Spokane Rifle Club, RMEF
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2016, 10:12:34 PM »
Is alfalfa considered a grain? I don't consider it to be? Grain is oats corn and such. If all it says is apples, grains and mineral, theres plenty other things I will can think of. And are they talking about 10 gallon limit in a automated feeder? If someone shoots a deer eating their 800 lb bale of alfalfa out in their field is that considered baiting because its sitting out?.............. Is it all going to be up to an officer to determine everything..... What a joke.

Online Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9007
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2016, 10:31:20 PM »
Funny how the States many say they will spend their money in have already banned!  Food for thought.

Those states offer excellent draw odds and exponentially longer seasons. When a hunter can chase deer for three months in Idaho with a regular tag and the overall hunter success rate is 50% I guess baiting would make it too easy.. Food for thought  ;)
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2016, 10:36:38 PM »
LeviD1-

No, alfalfa is not grain, but it's bait if used to attract deer or elk for the purpose of hunting.

The 10 gallon limit applies to the amount that's actually on the ground.

And no, alfalfa in a field is not bait unless it was intentionally placed there to attract deer or elk.

I certainly wouldn't call it a joke. I'm glad they put these restrictions on baiting instead of banning it completely as the majority of the western states have done.

Offline Duffer

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 325
  • Location: Camano Island
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2016, 11:56:54 PM »
LeviD1-

No, alfalfa is not grain, but it's bait if used to attract deer or elk for the purpose of hunting.

The 10 gallon limit applies to the amount that's actually on the ground.

And no, alfalfa in a field is not bait unless it was intentionally placed there to attract deer or elk.

I certainly wouldn't call it a joke. I'm glad they put these restrictions on baiting instead of banning it completely as the majority of the western states have done.

Agreed. Personally, I just want to understand the new rules so I can comply. I'm good with the's new rules

For instance, one of my feeders is a 30 gallon barrel with a timer/dispenser which drops about one cup of alfalfa pellets twice a day. Does the 10 gals rule apply to the dispensed feed or the barrel volume?
-Duffer
Camano Island

Article-5 IS THE ONLY ANSWER

Offline huntingfool7

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1724
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
  • Groups: huntingfool7
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2016, 05:13:43 AM »
It's the volume on the ground.  You can have thirty gallons of bait in a feeder as long as there is less than ten on the ground.

Online Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 9007
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2016, 07:14:31 AM »
LeviD1-

No, alfalfa is not grain, but it's bait if used to attract deer or elk for the purpose of hunting.

The 10 gallon limit applies to the amount that's actually on the ground.

And no, alfalfa in a field is not bait unless it was intentionally placed there to attract deer or elk.

I certainly wouldn't call it a joke. I'm glad they put these restrictions on baiting instead of banning it completely as the majority of the western states have done.

 :yeah: plenty of Eastern states as well.  Oh and for anybody curious, alfalfa is a legume  :chuckle:
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline OutHouse

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 3324
  • Location: Cowiche WA
  • Department of Foliage, Lifetime Member
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2016, 04:27:47 PM »
I think you are right about that. When laws are being drawn back, that regression is usually a one way street. I see it all the time when the law changes and I have to re-advise clients. By they way, were you the guy on the cover of the game rules a few years ago? That buck and pic look mighty familiar.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21825
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Baiting Restrictions
« Reply #14 on: April 12, 2016, 04:34:54 PM »
I haven't seen the new RCW but I suspect the definition of bait will follow the definition used for bears.

d) As used in this subsection, "bait" means a substance placed, exposed, deposited, distributed, scattered, or otherwise used for the purpose of attracting black bears to an area where one or more persons hunt or intend to hunt them.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

.45 kentucky rifle and patched roundballs by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 05:10:57 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by storyteller
[Today at 04:57:26 PM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by leonpeon2
[Today at 03:52:24 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Today at 03:23:24 PM]


Nile bull hunters by Ridgerunner
[Today at 02:42:13 PM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by Wolfdog2314
[Today at 02:41:03 PM]


Smoked salmon by mikey549
[Today at 02:17:02 PM]


Unit 346 little naches by jrebel
[Today at 01:46:49 PM]


WHAT DID YOUR TRUCK COST NEW? by millerwheeler
[Today at 01:31:45 PM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:14:46 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by hunter399
[Today at 08:39:56 AM]


What happened to the Cowlitz by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:39:22 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by Wanttohuntmore
[Today at 06:53:00 AM]


Curious Kitty by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 06:02:49 AM]


Reproduction for a Euro Mount in Wa??? by blindluck
[Today at 04:13:44 AM]


Roadless Rule Public Comment by addicted1
[Yesterday at 09:22:08 PM]


Goose hunting in Spokane by Pomdale
[Yesterday at 08:34:54 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:58:25 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 06:48:19 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 05:55:51 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal