Free: Contests & Raffles.
I believe CBoom lost a bet with me and owes some money to the Youth Turkey hunt but wasn't he banned? Or am I thinking of someone else?
Good deal. He seemed like a man of his word.
Quote from: Pinetar on August 31, 2016, 08:29:48 PMGood deal. He seemed like a man of his word.Agreed
Good deal. He seemed like a man of his word. Hopefully he will come through and pay up. PM the man Jrebel
Quote from: huntnphool on August 31, 2016, 08:31:25 PMQuote from: Pinetar on August 31, 2016, 08:29:48 PMGood deal. He seemed like a man of his word.AgreedI must be missing it, but what bet did he lose?(I thought it was he'd pay if TR was found guilty of poaching)?
Quote from: Dan-o on August 31, 2016, 08:38:16 PMQuote from: huntnphool on August 31, 2016, 08:31:25 PMQuote from: Pinetar on August 31, 2016, 08:29:48 PMGood deal. He seemed like a man of his word. AgreedI must be missing it, but what bet did he lose?(I thought it was he'd pay if TR was found guilty of poaching)?That would have been the safer bet! I did say he wouldn't be charged. The $ will go for a good cause for kids. I'd make make a bet any day when the kids win either way. I don't gamble at casinos, once in awhile play a very small time game of poker with friends. Really only try to make bets when I feal like I don't lose either way no matter the outcome, unless it's a sure thing! When I made this bet I already decided I should be donating to a good thing like that. Might have done more if I won the bet!
Quote from: huntnphool on August 31, 2016, 08:31:25 PMQuote from: Pinetar on August 31, 2016, 08:29:48 PMGood deal. He seemed like a man of his word. AgreedI must be missing it, but what bet did he lose?(I thought it was he'd pay if TR was found guilty of poaching)?
Quote from: Pinetar on August 31, 2016, 08:29:48 PMGood deal. He seemed like a man of his word. Agreed
The prosecutor's choice to charge the other guy is A) justified as we know he is a liar--all calls to the game department are recorded and his wasn't i.e. it didn't happen and B) he can still testify in the defense of his friend but the questions asked of him need to be tailored as to not open the door on cross examination to questions that incriminate him. Practically speaking, the companion hunter's attorney is going to tell him not to testify at all. Either way that's probably a good thing because that fake story about the call to the game department is going to be impeached when a representative from the department testifies that the calls are recorded, and this conversation never took place. I do defense work and I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that the attorney is hoping that someone on the jury is sympathetic to this old fool, and will not vote guilty. It's not a bad idea. If I were advising this fellow, I'd tell him there is plenty of evidence of guilt and you will likely be convicted, but maybe we can get someone on the jury who will feel sympathetic to you. Regardless of what happens, the old fart is a SMEAR on the reputation of all sportsmen.
Quote from: Dan-o on August 31, 2016, 08:38:16 PMQuote from: huntnphool on August 31, 2016, 08:31:25 PMQuote from: Pinetar on August 31, 2016, 08:29:48 PMGood deal. He seemed like a man of his word.AgreedI must be missing it, but what bet did he lose?(I thought it was he'd pay if TR was found guilty of poaching)?That would have been the safer bet! I did say he wouldn't be charged. The $ will go for a good cause for kids. I'd make make a bet any day when the kids win either way. I don't gamble at casinos, once in awhile play a very small time game of poker with friends. Really only try to make bets when I feal like I don't lose either way no matter the outcome, unless it's a sure thing! When I made this bet I already decided I should be donating to a good thing like that. Might have done more if I won the bet!